Repeat Catheter Ablation after Very Late Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Isolation

Niklas Stauffer, Sven Knecht, Patrick Badertscher, Philipp Krisai, Elisa Hennings, Teodor Serban, Gian Voellmin, Stefan Osswald, Christian Sticherling, Michael Kühne
{"title":"Repeat Catheter Ablation after Very Late Recurrence of Atrial Fibrillation after Pulmonary Vein Isolation","authors":"Niklas Stauffer, Sven Knecht, Patrick Badertscher, Philipp Krisai, Elisa Hennings, Teodor Serban, Gian Voellmin, Stefan Osswald, Christian Sticherling, Michael Kühne","doi":"10.1093/europace/euae096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Structured Abstract Background and Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurs in about one third of patients after catheter ablation (CA), mostly in the first year. Little is known about the electrophysiological findings and the effect of re-ablation in very late AF recurrences after more than one year. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and outcomes of the first repeat CA after very late recurrence of AF after index CA. Methods We analysed patients from a prospective Swiss registry that underwent a first repeat ablation procedure. Patients were stratified depending on the time to recurrence after index procedure: early recurrence (ER) for recurrences within the first year and late recurrence (LR) if the recurrence was later. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF in the first year after repeat ablation. Results Out of 1864 patients included in the registry, 426 patients undergoing a repeat ablation were included in the analysis (28% female, age 63 ± 9.8 years, 46% persistent AF). 291 patients (68%) were stratified in the ER group and 135 patients (32%) in the LR group. Pulmonary vein reconnections were a common finding in both groups, with 93% in the ER group compared to 86% in the LR group (p = 0.052). In the LR group, 40 of 135 patients (30%) had a recurrence of AF compared to 90 of 291 patients (31%) in the ER group (log rank p = 0.72). Conclusion There was no association between the time to recurrence of AF after initial catheter ablation and the characteristics and outcomes of the repeat procedure.","PeriodicalId":11720,"journal":{"name":"EP Europace","volume":"53 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EP Europace","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/europace/euae096","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Structured Abstract Background and Aims Atrial fibrillation (AF) recurs in about one third of patients after catheter ablation (CA), mostly in the first year. Little is known about the electrophysiological findings and the effect of re-ablation in very late AF recurrences after more than one year. The aim of this study was to determine the characteristics and outcomes of the first repeat CA after very late recurrence of AF after index CA. Methods We analysed patients from a prospective Swiss registry that underwent a first repeat ablation procedure. Patients were stratified depending on the time to recurrence after index procedure: early recurrence (ER) for recurrences within the first year and late recurrence (LR) if the recurrence was later. The primary endpoint was freedom from AF in the first year after repeat ablation. Results Out of 1864 patients included in the registry, 426 patients undergoing a repeat ablation were included in the analysis (28% female, age 63 ± 9.8 years, 46% persistent AF). 291 patients (68%) were stratified in the ER group and 135 patients (32%) in the LR group. Pulmonary vein reconnections were a common finding in both groups, with 93% in the ER group compared to 86% in the LR group (p = 0.052). In the LR group, 40 of 135 patients (30%) had a recurrence of AF compared to 90 of 291 patients (31%) in the ER group (log rank p = 0.72). Conclusion There was no association between the time to recurrence of AF after initial catheter ablation and the characteristics and outcomes of the repeat procedure.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺静脉隔离术后心房颤动极晚期复发,再次导管消融术
结构化摘要 背景和目的 约有三分之一的患者在接受导管消融术(CA)后会复发心房颤动(AF),多数是在第一年内复发。对于超过一年的极晚期房颤复发患者的电生理检查结果和再次消融的效果,人们知之甚少。本研究的目的是确定指数 CA 后房颤极晚复发后首次重复 CA 的特征和效果。方法 我们分析了来自瑞士前瞻性登记处的接受首次重复消融术的患者。根据指数手术后的复发时间对患者进行分层:第一年内复发的为早期复发(ER),一年后复发的为晚期复发(LR)。主要终点是重复消融术后第一年内不再发生房颤。结果 在登记的 1864 名患者中,有 426 名接受了重复消融术的患者纳入了分析(28% 为女性,年龄为 63 ± 9.8 岁,46% 为持续性房颤)。291名患者(68%)被分为 ER 组,135 名患者(32%)被分为 LR 组。肺静脉再连接在两组中都很常见,ER 组为 93%,而 LR 组为 86%(P = 0.052)。在 LR 组中,135 名患者中有 40 人(30%)再次出现房颤,而在 ER 组中,291 名患者中有 90 人(31%)再次出现房颤(对数秩 p = 0.72)。结论 首次导管消融术后房颤复发的时间与重复手术的特征和结果之间没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
High lead-related complication rate with MicroPort Vega active fixation pacing leads. Dual chamber versus single chamber pacemaker in patients in sinus rhythm with an atrioventricular block: a nationwide cohort study Ventricular Arrhythmias in Acute Heart Failure. A Clinical Consensus Statement of the Association for Acute CardioVascular Care Association (ACVC), the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) and the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC Enhancing Origin Prediction: Deep Learning Model for Diagnosing Premature Ventricular Contractions with Dual-Rhythm Analysis Focused on Cardiac Rotation A computational study on the influence of antegrade accessory pathway location on the 12-lead electrocardiogram in Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1