Investigation of Unsteady Combustion Regimes in a Kerosene-Fueled Scramjet with Air Throttling

IF 1.7 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Journal of Propulsion and Power Pub Date : 2024-04-11 DOI:10.2514/1.b39424
Ye Tian, Guangming Du, Yanguang Yang, Jialing Le, Hong Liu
{"title":"Investigation of Unsteady Combustion Regimes in a Kerosene-Fueled Scramjet with Air Throttling","authors":"Ye Tian, Guangming Du, Yanguang Yang, Jialing Le, Hong Liu","doi":"10.2514/1.b39424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper describes an experimental study investigating unsteady combustion regimes in a kerosene-fueled scramjet. The results are obtained under inflow conditions of a 2.9 MPa stagnation pressure, 1900 K stagnation temperature, and a Mach number of 3.0. The air throttling position is 240 mm downstream of the combustor entrance, with an air throttling flow rate (ratio of air throttling mass flux to inflow mass flux) of 38% and a fuel equivalence ratio of 0.37. Combustion is relatively stable when air throttling is applied and is dominated by auto-ignition. When air throttling is turned off, the combustion becomes more unsteady and is dominated by flame propagation. At the same time, the combustion mode changes, and the frequency of the combustion mode transition is 286 Hz. Schlieren images and one-dimension analysis show that the effect of air throttling is the coupling of cold throat (aerodynamic throat) and hot throat (thermal throat). The proper orthogonal decomposition and dynamic mode decomposition analysis present that when air throttling is applied or removed, the frequencies of injector–flame feedback are almost the same, while the frequencies of shock–flame feedback exhibit considerable variation, which is caused by the location of the precombustion shock affected by air throttling.</p>","PeriodicalId":16903,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Propulsion and Power","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Propulsion and Power","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2514/1.b39424","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper describes an experimental study investigating unsteady combustion regimes in a kerosene-fueled scramjet. The results are obtained under inflow conditions of a 2.9 MPa stagnation pressure, 1900 K stagnation temperature, and a Mach number of 3.0. The air throttling position is 240 mm downstream of the combustor entrance, with an air throttling flow rate (ratio of air throttling mass flux to inflow mass flux) of 38% and a fuel equivalence ratio of 0.37. Combustion is relatively stable when air throttling is applied and is dominated by auto-ignition. When air throttling is turned off, the combustion becomes more unsteady and is dominated by flame propagation. At the same time, the combustion mode changes, and the frequency of the combustion mode transition is 286 Hz. Schlieren images and one-dimension analysis show that the effect of air throttling is the coupling of cold throat (aerodynamic throat) and hot throat (thermal throat). The proper orthogonal decomposition and dynamic mode decomposition analysis present that when air throttling is applied or removed, the frequencies of injector–flame feedback are almost the same, while the frequencies of shock–flame feedback exhibit considerable variation, which is caused by the location of the precombustion shock affected by air throttling.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
煤油燃料喷气式喷气发动机非稳态燃烧规律研究
本文介绍了一项研究煤油燃料喷气式飞机非稳定燃烧机制的实验研究。实验结果是在停滞压力为 2.9 兆帕、停滞温度为 1900 开氏度、马赫数为 3.0 的流入条件下获得的。空气节流位置在燃烧器入口下游 240 毫米处,空气节流率(空气节流质量通量与流入质量通量之比)为 38%,燃料当量比为 0.37。采用空气节流时,燃烧相对稳定,以自燃为主。当关闭空气节流时,燃烧变得更加不稳定,以火焰传播为主。同时,燃烧模式发生变化,燃烧模式转换频率为 286 赫兹。Schlieren 图像和一维分析表明,空气节流的影响是冷喉管(空气动力学喉管)和热喉管(热喉管)的耦合。适当的正交分解和动模分解分析表明,在实施或取消空气节流时,喷射器-火焰反馈的频率基本相同,而冲击-火焰反馈的频率则表现出相当大的差异,这是受空气节流影响的燃烧前冲击位置造成的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Propulsion and Power
Journal of Propulsion and Power 工程技术-工程:宇航
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
21.10%
发文量
97
审稿时长
6.5 months
期刊介绍: This Journal is devoted to the advancement of the science and technology of aerospace propulsion and power through the dissemination of original archival papers contributing to advancements in airbreathing, electric, and advanced propulsion; solid and liquid rockets; fuels and propellants; power generation and conversion for aerospace vehicles; and the application of aerospace science and technology to terrestrial energy devices and systems. It is intended to provide readers of the Journal, with primary interests in propulsion and power, access to papers spanning the range from research through development to applications. Papers in these disciplines and the sciences of combustion, fluid mechanics, and solid mechanics as directly related to propulsion and power are solicited.
期刊最新文献
Impact of Future Low-Emissions Combustor Technology on Acoustic Scaling Laws Experimental Investigation on Atomization of JP-10 Slurry Jets Containing Boron Nanoparticles Fuel Temperature Effects on Combustion Stability of a High-Pressure Liquid-Fueled Swirl Flame Optimization of Thrust of a Generic X-51 Hypersonic Vehicle Application of Boundary Layer Combustion in High-Mach-Number Scramjets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1