A framework for understanding the contributions of local residents to protected area law enforcement

IF 2.2 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q2 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Oryx Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1017/s0030605323001758
William Sharkey, E.J. Milner-Gulland, Pablo Sinovas, Aidan Keane
{"title":"A framework for understanding the contributions of local residents to protected area law enforcement","authors":"William Sharkey, E.J. Milner-Gulland, Pablo Sinovas, Aidan Keane","doi":"10.1017/s0030605323001758","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Terrestrial and marine protected areas have long been championed as an approach to biodiversity conservation. For protected areas to be effective, equitable and inclusive, the involvement of local residents in their management and governance is considered important. Globally, there are many approaches to involving local residents in protected area law enforcement. However, opportunities for comparing different approaches have been limited by the lack of a clear common framework for analysis. To support a more holistic understanding, we present a framework for analysing the contributions of local residents to protected area law enforcement. Informed by a review of the literature and discussions with conservation practitioners, the framework comprises five key dimensions: (1) the different points in the enforcement system at which local residents are involved, (2) the nature of local participation in decision-making, (3) the type of external support provided to local residents, (4) the different motivating forces for participation, and (5) the extent to which local participation is formalized. We apply the framework to three real-world case studies to demonstrate its use in analysing and comparing the characteristics of different approaches. We suggest this framework could be used to examine variation in local participation within the enforcement system, inform evaluation and frame constructive discussions between relevant stakeholders. With the global coverage of protected areas likely to increase, the framework provides a foundation for better understanding the contributions of local residents to protected area law enforcement.</p>","PeriodicalId":19694,"journal":{"name":"Oryx","volume":"2 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oryx","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605323001758","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Terrestrial and marine protected areas have long been championed as an approach to biodiversity conservation. For protected areas to be effective, equitable and inclusive, the involvement of local residents in their management and governance is considered important. Globally, there are many approaches to involving local residents in protected area law enforcement. However, opportunities for comparing different approaches have been limited by the lack of a clear common framework for analysis. To support a more holistic understanding, we present a framework for analysing the contributions of local residents to protected area law enforcement. Informed by a review of the literature and discussions with conservation practitioners, the framework comprises five key dimensions: (1) the different points in the enforcement system at which local residents are involved, (2) the nature of local participation in decision-making, (3) the type of external support provided to local residents, (4) the different motivating forces for participation, and (5) the extent to which local participation is formalized. We apply the framework to three real-world case studies to demonstrate its use in analysing and comparing the characteristics of different approaches. We suggest this framework could be used to examine variation in local participation within the enforcement system, inform evaluation and frame constructive discussions between relevant stakeholders. With the global coverage of protected areas likely to increase, the framework provides a foundation for better understanding the contributions of local residents to protected area law enforcement.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解当地居民对保护区执法贡献的框架
长期以来,陆地和海洋保护区一直被视为保护生物多样性的一种方法。为了使保护区有效、公平和具有包容性,当地居民参与保护区的管理和治理被认为是非常重要的。全球有许多让当地居民参与保护区执法的方法。但是,由于缺乏明确的共同分析框架,比较不同方法的机会受到了限制。为了支持更全面的理解,我们提出了一个分析当地居民对保护区执法贡献的框架。根据文献综述和与保护工作者的讨论,该框架包括五个关键方面:(1) 当地居民参与执法系统的不同点,(2) 当地参与决策的性质,(3) 为当地居民提供的外部支持类型,(4) 参与的不同动力,以及 (5) 当地参与的正规化程度。我们将该框架应用于三个实际案例研究,以展示其在分析和比较不同方法的特点方面的用途。我们建议使用该框架来检查执法系统中地方参与的差异,为评估提供信息,并为相关利益方之间的建设性讨论提供框架。随着保护区的全球覆盖率可能会增加,该框架为更好地理解当地居民对保护区执法的贡献奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oryx
Oryx 环境科学-生态学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
7.40%
发文量
150
审稿时长
18-36 weeks
期刊介绍: ORYX—THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONSERVATION, a quarterly journal from Fauna & Flora International, publishes research on biodiversity conservation, conservation policy and sustainable use, and the interactions of these matters with social, economic and political issues. The journal has a particular interest in material with the potential to improve conservation management and practice. Explore the map for details of published articles.
期刊最新文献
Georeferencing Sunda pangolin Manis javanica records in Singapore The Pangolin Universal Notching System: a scale-marking methodology for pangolins The lion's share: implications of carnivore diet for threatened herbivores in Tsavo, Kenya Exploring links between socio-ecological systems and psychological distress: a case study in rural Uganda First Red List of Ecosystems assessment of a tropical glacier ecosystem to diagnose the pathways towards imminent collapse
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1