Paradox of navigating uncertainty: ancient ‘soft stuff’ makes us tough

IF 1.7 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES BMJ Leader Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1136/leader-2023-000932
James K Stoller, Alan Kolp, Andy Walshe, Peter Rea
{"title":"Paradox of navigating uncertainty: ancient ‘soft stuff’ makes us tough","authors":"James K Stoller, Alan Kolp, Andy Walshe, Peter Rea","doi":"10.1136/leader-2023-000932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"All leaders are impacted by uncertainty and the accompanying stress. What is often missing is a framework for leaders to cope with and ideally thrive in circumstances beyond our control. Without a framework, uncertainty can cause us to become fearful, disoriented and uprooted. We cling to a life that may no longer be available, and consequently, we may struggle to adapt. The central thesis of this perspective, which is supported by time-honoured concepts from great thinkers and current empiric evidence,1 is that humans’ ability to navigate uncertainty and stress and leaders’ ability to lead through tough challenges is enhanced when their character—their identity—is anchored by what is often considered ‘soft stuff’—the seven classic virtues of trust, compassion, courage, justice, wisdom, temperance and hope. As evidence of the robustness of this thesis, these virtues have been espoused as the way to live by great thinkers over millenia—Aristotle, Plutarch, Heraclitus, Confucius, Lao Tse.1 Extending the concept that a virtue-based character is key to navigating uncertainty, we propose that our identity informs other important assets that build resilience—our purpose and our relationships. Taken together, these three elements—identity, relationships and purpose—have been espoused as tools to navigate transitions2 and help leaders lead through the inevitable uncertainty that defines the human journey. We begin by framing the current state of stress in the world—dubbed the ‘polycrisis’3—and then develop the thesis. On the one hand, it is curious to think that we need research to prove that a person, team or organisation governed by trust, compassion, courage, justice, wisdom, temperance and hope would have higher levels of engagement despite uncertainty than a dysfunctional person, team or organisation defined by distrust, callousness, cowardice and despair. On the other hand, there is ample evidence that makes the case for virtue as a resilience …","PeriodicalId":36677,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Leader","volume":"103 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Leader","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/leader-2023-000932","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

All leaders are impacted by uncertainty and the accompanying stress. What is often missing is a framework for leaders to cope with and ideally thrive in circumstances beyond our control. Without a framework, uncertainty can cause us to become fearful, disoriented and uprooted. We cling to a life that may no longer be available, and consequently, we may struggle to adapt. The central thesis of this perspective, which is supported by time-honoured concepts from great thinkers and current empiric evidence,1 is that humans’ ability to navigate uncertainty and stress and leaders’ ability to lead through tough challenges is enhanced when their character—their identity—is anchored by what is often considered ‘soft stuff’—the seven classic virtues of trust, compassion, courage, justice, wisdom, temperance and hope. As evidence of the robustness of this thesis, these virtues have been espoused as the way to live by great thinkers over millenia—Aristotle, Plutarch, Heraclitus, Confucius, Lao Tse.1 Extending the concept that a virtue-based character is key to navigating uncertainty, we propose that our identity informs other important assets that build resilience—our purpose and our relationships. Taken together, these three elements—identity, relationships and purpose—have been espoused as tools to navigate transitions2 and help leaders lead through the inevitable uncertainty that defines the human journey. We begin by framing the current state of stress in the world—dubbed the ‘polycrisis’3—and then develop the thesis. On the one hand, it is curious to think that we need research to prove that a person, team or organisation governed by trust, compassion, courage, justice, wisdom, temperance and hope would have higher levels of engagement despite uncertainty than a dysfunctional person, team or organisation defined by distrust, callousness, cowardice and despair. On the other hand, there is ample evidence that makes the case for virtue as a resilience …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
驾驭不确定性的悖论:古老的 "软性物质 "让我们坚韧不拔
所有领导者都会受到不确定性和随之而来的压力的影响。领导者往往缺少一个框架来应对我们无法控制的环境,并在理想的情况下茁壮成长。如果没有一个框架,不确定性会让我们变得恐惧、迷失方向和背井离乡。我们紧紧抓住一种可能不再存在的生活,因此,我们可能难以适应。这一观点的核心论点得到了伟大思想家的悠久理念和当前经验证据1 的支持,即当人类的性格--他们的身份--以通常被认为是 "软性的东西"--即信任、同情、勇气、正义、智慧、节制和希望这七种经典美德为基础时,人类驾驭不确定性和压力的能力以及领导者应对严峻挑战的能力就会得到增强。千百年来,这些美德一直被伟大的思想家--如亚里士多德、普鲁塔克、赫拉克利特、孔子和老子--奉为处世之道,这也证明了这一论点的正确性1。这三个要素--身份、关系和目标--合在一起,被认为是驾驭过渡的工具2 ,可以帮助领导者克服人类旅程中不可避免的不确定性。我们首先介绍了当前世界的压力状况--被称为 "多重危机 "3 ,然后展开论述。一方面,我们需要研究来证明,一个受信任、同情、勇气、正义、智慧、节制和希望支配的个人、团队或组织,尽管存在不确定性,但其参与度要高于一个受不信任、冷酷、懦弱和绝望支配的功能失调的个人、团队或组织,这种想法很奇怪。另一方面,有大量证据表明,美德是一种复原力......
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Leader
BMJ Leader Nursing-Leadership and Management
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
7.40%
发文量
57
期刊最新文献
Religious identity-based discrimination in the physician workforce: findings from a survey of Muslim physicians in the UK. Ten years on: The Snowy White Peaks of the NHS. Gender disparity in Canadian Institutes of Health Research funding within neurology. Impact of department chair gender on paid parental leave across American anaesthesiology residencies. 'Can you have it all?' Exploring perceived gender roles in leadership through the lens of the Chief Pharmaceutical Officer's clinical fellows 2023/24.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1