Understanding emotional and health indicators underlying the burnout risk of healthcare workers

Elçin Güveyi, Garry Elvin, Angela Kennedy, Zeyneb Kurt, Petia Sice, Paras Patel, Antoinette Dubruel, Drummond Heckels
{"title":"Understanding emotional and health indicators underlying the burnout risk of healthcare workers","authors":"Elçin Güveyi, Garry Elvin, Angela Kennedy, Zeyneb Kurt, Petia Sice, Paras Patel, Antoinette Dubruel, Drummond Heckels","doi":"10.1101/2024.04.11.24305661","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Burnout of healthcare workers is of increasing concern as workload pressures mount. Burnout is usually conceptualised as resulting from external pressures rather than internal resilience and although is not a diagnosable condition, it is related to help seeking for its psychological sequelae.\nObjective: To understand how staff support services can intervene with staff heading for burnout, it is important to understand what other intrapsychic factors that are related to it.\nMethods: A diary tool was used by staff in a region of England to self monitor their wellbeing over time. The tool explores many areas of mental health and wellbeing and enabled regression analysis to predict which of the various factors predicted scores on the burnout item.\nFindings: Burnout can be best explained with independent variables including depression, receptiveness, mental wellbeing, and connectedness (p<0.05) using a multiple linear regression model. It was also shown that 71% of the variance present in the response variable, i.e. burnout, explained by independent variables. There is no evidence found for multicollinearity in our regression models confirmed by both the Spearman Rank Correlation and the Variance Inflation Factor methods.\nConclusion: We showed how burnout can be explained using a handful number of factors including emotional and mental health indicators.\nClinical implications: The findings suggest a simple set of items can predict burnout and could be used for screening. The data suggests attention to four factors around social safeness, grounding and care in the self, hope and meaning and having sufficient energy could form the basis of attention in weelbeing programs.","PeriodicalId":501555,"journal":{"name":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"medRxiv - Occupational and Environmental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.04.11.24305661","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout of healthcare workers is of increasing concern as workload pressures mount. Burnout is usually conceptualised as resulting from external pressures rather than internal resilience and although is not a diagnosable condition, it is related to help seeking for its psychological sequelae. Objective: To understand how staff support services can intervene with staff heading for burnout, it is important to understand what other intrapsychic factors that are related to it. Methods: A diary tool was used by staff in a region of England to self monitor their wellbeing over time. The tool explores many areas of mental health and wellbeing and enabled regression analysis to predict which of the various factors predicted scores on the burnout item. Findings: Burnout can be best explained with independent variables including depression, receptiveness, mental wellbeing, and connectedness (p<0.05) using a multiple linear regression model. It was also shown that 71% of the variance present in the response variable, i.e. burnout, explained by independent variables. There is no evidence found for multicollinearity in our regression models confirmed by both the Spearman Rank Correlation and the Variance Inflation Factor methods. Conclusion: We showed how burnout can be explained using a handful number of factors including emotional and mental health indicators. Clinical implications: The findings suggest a simple set of items can predict burnout and could be used for screening. The data suggests attention to four factors around social safeness, grounding and care in the self, hope and meaning and having sufficient energy could form the basis of attention in weelbeing programs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解医护人员职业倦怠风险背后的情绪和健康指标
背景:随着工作量压力的增加,医护人员的职业倦怠问题日益受到关注。职业倦怠通常被认为是由外部压力而非内部恢复力造成的,虽然它不是一种可诊断的病症,但却与寻求心理后遗症方面的帮助有关:要想了解员工支持服务机构如何对面临职业倦怠的员工进行干预,就必须了解与职业倦怠有关的其他心理因素:方法:英格兰某地区的员工使用了一种日记工具来自我监测一段时间内的健康状况。该工具探讨了心理健康和幸福感的多个方面,并通过回归分析预测了各种因素中哪些因素可以预测职业倦怠项目的得分:使用多元线性回归模型,包括抑郁、接受能力、心理健康和连通性在内的自变量(p<0.05)最能解释职业倦怠。研究还表明,71%的反应变量(即职业倦怠)方差是由自变量解释的。斯皮尔曼等级相关法和方差膨胀因子法均证实,在我们的回归模型中没有发现多重共线性的证据:我们展示了如何利用包括情绪和心理健康指标在内的少量因素来解释职业倦怠:研究结果表明,一组简单的项目就可以预测职业倦怠,并可用于筛查。这些数据表明,关注围绕社会安全感、对自我的立足和关怀、希望和意义以及拥有充足的精力这四个因素,可以成为关注健康计划的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
In-utero exposure to PM2.5 and adverse birth outcomes in India: Geostatistical modelling using remote sensing and demographic health survey data 2019-21 Protocol for the Work And Vocational advicE (WAVE) randomised controlled trial testing the addition of vocational advice to usual primary care (Clinical Trials: NCT04543097) Harnessing non-standard nucleic acids for highly sensitive icosaplex (20-plex) detection of microbial threats Association of occupational exposure to chemical substances with bladder cancer in Ethiopia: A multi-center matched case-control Study The association between nurse staffing configurations and sickness absence: longitudinal study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1