{"title":"Raz on responsibility: comments on Mayr","authors":"Sergio Tenenbaum","doi":"10.1080/20403313.2023.2297585","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, I present a qualified defence of Raz's account of responsibility in response to Erasmus Mayr's important criticisms in this contribution to this issue.","PeriodicalId":501391,"journal":{"name":"Jurisprudence","volume":"70 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurisprudence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/20403313.2023.2297585","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In this paper, I present a qualified defence of Raz's account of responsibility in response to Erasmus Mayr's important criticisms in this contribution to this issue.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
