Novel gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection training model enhances the endoscopic submucosal dissection skills of trainees: a multicenter comparative study

Tomohiro Mitsui, Hironori Sunakawa, Yusuke Yoda, Masafumi Nishio, Shinpei Kondo, Jun Hamanaka, Chikako Tokoro, Keiichiro Nakajo, Shin Maeda, Tomonori Yano, Kingo Hirasawa
{"title":"Novel gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection training model enhances the endoscopic submucosal dissection skills of trainees: a multicenter comparative study","authors":"Tomohiro Mitsui, Hironori Sunakawa, Yusuke Yoda, Masafumi Nishio, Shinpei Kondo, Jun Hamanaka, Chikako Tokoro, Keiichiro Nakajo, Shin Maeda, Tomonori Yano, Kingo Hirasawa","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10838-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) requires high endoscopic technical skills, and trainees should develop effective training methods. In collaboration with KOTOBUKI Medical, we developed the G-Master, which is a non-animal training model that can simulate various parts of gastric ESD. We aimed to clarify the usefulness of the G-Master for inexperienced ESD trainees.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We collected data from the first 5 gastric ESD cases conducted by 15 inexperienced ESD trainees at 5 participating centers between 2018 and 2022. The participants were divided into two groups: the G-Master training and non-G-Master training groups. Outcome measurements, such as procedural speed, perforation rate, self-completion rate, and en bloc resection rate, were compared between the two groups retrospectively.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>A total of 75 gastric ESD cases were included in this study. The G-Master training group included 25 cases performed by 5 trainees, whereas the non-G-Master training group included 50 cases performed by 10 trainees. The median procedural speed for all cases was significantly faster in the G-Master training group than in the non-G-Master training group. Moreover, the procedural speed was linearly improved from the initial to the last cases in the lower location in the G-Master training group compared with the non-G-Master training group. In addition, although there was no significant difference, the G-Master training group showed lower rates of perforation and a lesser need to transition to expert operators than the non-G-Master training group.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>The G-Master could improve the ESD skills of inexperienced ESD trainees.</p>","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"92 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10838-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) requires high endoscopic technical skills, and trainees should develop effective training methods. In collaboration with KOTOBUKI Medical, we developed the G-Master, which is a non-animal training model that can simulate various parts of gastric ESD. We aimed to clarify the usefulness of the G-Master for inexperienced ESD trainees.

Methods

We collected data from the first 5 gastric ESD cases conducted by 15 inexperienced ESD trainees at 5 participating centers between 2018 and 2022. The participants were divided into two groups: the G-Master training and non-G-Master training groups. Outcome measurements, such as procedural speed, perforation rate, self-completion rate, and en bloc resection rate, were compared between the two groups retrospectively.

Results

A total of 75 gastric ESD cases were included in this study. The G-Master training group included 25 cases performed by 5 trainees, whereas the non-G-Master training group included 50 cases performed by 10 trainees. The median procedural speed for all cases was significantly faster in the G-Master training group than in the non-G-Master training group. Moreover, the procedural speed was linearly improved from the initial to the last cases in the lower location in the G-Master training group compared with the non-G-Master training group. In addition, although there was no significant difference, the G-Master training group showed lower rates of perforation and a lesser need to transition to expert operators than the non-G-Master training group.

Conclusion

The G-Master could improve the ESD skills of inexperienced ESD trainees.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新型胃内镜黏膜下剥离术培训模型可提高受训者的内镜黏膜下剥离术技能:一项多中心比较研究
背景内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)对内镜技术的要求很高,学员应制定有效的培训方法。我们与 KOTOBUKI Medical 合作开发了 G-Master,它是一种非动物训练模型,可以模拟胃部 ESD 的各个部分。我们旨在明确 G-Master 对缺乏经验的 ESD 学员的实用性。方法我们收集了 2018 年至 2022 年期间 5 个参与中心的 15 名缺乏经验的 ESD 学员进行的前 5 个胃 ESD 病例的数据。参与者分为两组:G-Master 培训组和非 G-Master 培训组。对两组的手术速度、穿孔率、自我完成率和全切率等结果进行回顾性比较。结果本研究共纳入 75 例胃ESD病例。G-Master培训组包括5名学员完成的25个病例,而非G-Master培训组包括10名学员完成的50个病例。G-Master 培训组所有病例的中位手术速度明显快于非 G-Master 培训组。此外,与非 G-Master培训组相比,G-Master培训组的手术速度从最初的病例到最后的病例都呈线性增长,位置更低。结论 G-Master 可以提高缺乏经验的 ESD 学员的 ESD 技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-term gut microbiota’s shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial Classifying frailty in the ventral hernia population Retrospective study on endoscopic treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1