“Wrong” skewness and endogenous regressors in stochastic frontier models: an instrument-free copula approach with an application to estimate firm efficiency in Vietnam

IF 2.3 4区 经济学 Q3 BUSINESS Journal of Productivity Analysis Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1007/s11123-024-00722-6
Rouven E. Haschka
{"title":"“Wrong” skewness and endogenous regressors in stochastic frontier models: an instrument-free copula approach with an application to estimate firm efficiency in Vietnam","authors":"Rouven E. Haschka","doi":"10.1007/s11123-024-00722-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Stochastic frontier models commonly assume positively skewed inefficiency. However, if the data speak against this assumption, sample-failure problems are often cited, but less attention is paid to economic reasons. We consider this phenomenon as a signal of distinctive population characteristics stemming from the inefficiency component, emphasizing its potential impact on evaluating market conditions. Specifically, we argue more generally that “wrong” skewness could indicate a lack of competition in the market. Moreover, endogeneity of model regressors presents another challenge, hindering the identification of causal relationships. To tackle these issues, this paper proposes an instrument-free estimation method based on Gaussian copulas to model the dependence between endogenous regressors and composite errors, while accommodating positively or negatively skewed inefficiency through simultaneous identification. Monte Carlo simulation experiments demonstrate the suitability of our estimator, comparing it with alternative methods. The contributions of this study are twofold. On the one hand, we contribute to the literature on stochastic frontier models by providing a comprehensive method for dealing with “wrong” skewness and endogenous regressors simultaneously. On the other hand, our contribution to an economic understanding of “wrong” skewness expands the comprehension of market behaviors and competition levels. Empirical findings on Vietnamese firm efficiency indicate that endogeneity hinders the detection of “wrong” skewness and suggests a lack of competitive market conditions. The latter underscores the importance of policy interventions to incentivize firms in non-competitive markets.</p>","PeriodicalId":16870,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Productivity Analysis","volume":"207 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Productivity Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11123-024-00722-6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Stochastic frontier models commonly assume positively skewed inefficiency. However, if the data speak against this assumption, sample-failure problems are often cited, but less attention is paid to economic reasons. We consider this phenomenon as a signal of distinctive population characteristics stemming from the inefficiency component, emphasizing its potential impact on evaluating market conditions. Specifically, we argue more generally that “wrong” skewness could indicate a lack of competition in the market. Moreover, endogeneity of model regressors presents another challenge, hindering the identification of causal relationships. To tackle these issues, this paper proposes an instrument-free estimation method based on Gaussian copulas to model the dependence between endogenous regressors and composite errors, while accommodating positively or negatively skewed inefficiency through simultaneous identification. Monte Carlo simulation experiments demonstrate the suitability of our estimator, comparing it with alternative methods. The contributions of this study are twofold. On the one hand, we contribute to the literature on stochastic frontier models by providing a comprehensive method for dealing with “wrong” skewness and endogenous regressors simultaneously. On the other hand, our contribution to an economic understanding of “wrong” skewness expands the comprehension of market behaviors and competition levels. Empirical findings on Vietnamese firm efficiency indicate that endogeneity hinders the detection of “wrong” skewness and suggests a lack of competitive market conditions. The latter underscores the importance of policy interventions to incentivize firms in non-competitive markets.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
随机前沿模型中的 "错误 "偏度和内生回归因子:一种无工具共轭方法在越南企业效率估算中的应用
随机前沿模型通常假设无效率为正偏斜。然而,如果数据与这一假设相悖,人们往往会提到样本失效问题,但较少关注经济原因。我们认为这一现象是源于无效率成分的独特人口特征的信号,强调其对评估市场条件的潜在影响。具体而言,我们更普遍地认为,"错误的 "偏度可能表明市场缺乏竞争。此外,模型回归因子的内生性也是另一个挑战,阻碍了因果关系的识别。为解决这些问题,本文提出了一种基于高斯协方差的无工具估计方法,以模拟内生回归因子与复合误差之间的依赖关系,同时通过同步识别来适应正或负偏斜的无效率。蒙特卡罗模拟实验证明了我们的估计方法的适用性,并将其与其他方法进行了比较。本研究有两方面的贡献。一方面,我们提供了一种同时处理 "错误 "偏度和内生回归因子的综合方法,为随机前沿模型的文献做出了贡献。另一方面,我们对 "错误 "偏度的经济学理解的贡献拓展了对市场行为和竞争水平的理解。对越南企业效率的实证研究结果表明,内生性阻碍了对 "错误 "偏度的检测,并表明缺乏竞争性市场条件。后者强调了政策干预对激励非竞争性市场中企业的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The Journal of Productivity Analysis publishes theoretical and applied research that addresses issues involving the measurement, explanation, and improvement of productivity. The broad scope of the journal encompasses productivity-related developments spanning the disciplines of economics, the management sciences, operations research, and business and public administration. Topics covered in the journal include, but are not limited to, productivity theory, organizational design, index number theory, and related foundations of productivity analysis. The journal also publishes research on computational methods that are employed in productivity analysis, including econometric and mathematical programming techniques, and empirical research based on data at all levels of aggregation, ranging from aggregate macroeconomic data to disaggregate microeconomic data. The empirical research illustrates the application of theory and techniques to the measurement of productivity, and develops implications for the design of managerial strategies and public policy to enhance productivity. Officially cited as: J Prod Anal
期刊最新文献
Constant returns-to-scale production technologies with fixed ratio inputs and outputs Productivity, investment slowdown, and misallocation: evidence from Indian manufacturing To chain or not to chain? measuring real GDP in the US and the choice of index number The inefficiency of courts of justice: industry structure, capacity and misallocation Approximations and inference for envelopment estimators of production frontiers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1