When perceived similarity overrides demographic similarity: examining influences on STEM students’ developmental mentor networks

IF 5.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Stem Education Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1186/s40594-024-00480-9
Rachelle Pedersen, Anna Woodcock, P. Wesley Schultz, Paul R. Hernandez
{"title":"When perceived similarity overrides demographic similarity: examining influences on STEM students’ developmental mentor networks","authors":"Rachelle Pedersen, Anna Woodcock, P. Wesley Schultz, Paul R. Hernandez","doi":"10.1186/s40594-024-00480-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While dyadic faculty–mentored relationship research currently saturates the mentoring literature, recent developments suggest the need for a broader consideration of a student's mentor network. Research taking a network approach may provide deeper insights into the formation and benefits of mentorship for undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Utilizing Developmental Mentor Network Theory and ego-centric social network analysis, this pre-registered study evaluates how the characteristics of mentees and mentors relate to both the content of support and structure of mentor networks in a large sample of White and Hispanic/Latino(a) STEM undergraduates across 12 universities. Results were nuanced but showed that perceived psychological similarity with their mentor(s) predicted both dyadic and network average levels of mentor support (i.e., psychosocial, career, role modeling) and relational satisfaction. Furthermore, results point to homophily and engagement in undergraduate research effects on mentor network structures. These findings highlight the importance of using a network approach to deepen our understanding of the factors (e.g., psychological similarity) that may influence the formation and maintenance of robust and diverse supportive mentoring networks.","PeriodicalId":48581,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Stem Education","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Stem Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-024-00480-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While dyadic faculty–mentored relationship research currently saturates the mentoring literature, recent developments suggest the need for a broader consideration of a student's mentor network. Research taking a network approach may provide deeper insights into the formation and benefits of mentorship for undergraduate students in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) disciplines. Utilizing Developmental Mentor Network Theory and ego-centric social network analysis, this pre-registered study evaluates how the characteristics of mentees and mentors relate to both the content of support and structure of mentor networks in a large sample of White and Hispanic/Latino(a) STEM undergraduates across 12 universities. Results were nuanced but showed that perceived psychological similarity with their mentor(s) predicted both dyadic and network average levels of mentor support (i.e., psychosocial, career, role modeling) and relational satisfaction. Furthermore, results point to homophily and engagement in undergraduate research effects on mentor network structures. These findings highlight the importance of using a network approach to deepen our understanding of the factors (e.g., psychological similarity) that may influence the formation and maintenance of robust and diverse supportive mentoring networks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
当感知到的相似性超越了人口统计学上的相似性时:研究对 STEM 学生发展导师网络的影响
虽然教师与被指导者之间的关系研究目前已在指导文献中达到饱和,但最近的发展表明,有必要对学生的指导者网络进行更广泛的考虑。采用网络方法进行研究,可以更深入地了解科学、技术、工程和数学(STEM)学科本科生导师关系的形成和益处。利用发展导师网络理论和以自我为中心的社会网络分析,这项预先登记的研究评估了被指导者和指导者的特征与导师网络的支持内容和结构之间的关系,研究对象是 12 所大学的白人和西班牙裔/拉丁裔(a)STEM 本科生。研究结果有细微差别,但表明,被试与导师的心理相似性预示着导师支持(即社会心理、职业、榜样作用)和关系满意度的双向和网络平均水平。此外,研究结果还显示了同质性和参与本科生研究对导师网络结构的影响。这些发现凸显了使用网络方法来加深我们对可能影响强大而多样化的支持性指导网络的形成和维护的因素(如心理相似性)的理解的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Stem Education
International Journal of Stem Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
12.40
自引率
11.90%
发文量
68
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of STEM Education is a multidisciplinary journal in subject-content education that focuses on the study of teaching and learning in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM). It is being established as a brand new, forward looking journal in the field of education. As a peer-reviewed journal, it is positioned to promote research and educational development in the rapidly evolving field of STEM education around the world.
期刊最新文献
The S in STEM: gender differences in science anxiety and its relations with science test performance-related variables The transfer effect of computational thinking (CT)-STEM: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis Exploring instructional design in K-12 STEM education: a systematic literature review Academic social comparison: a promising new target to reduce fear of negative evaluation in large-enrollment college science courses One size doesn’t fit all: how different types of learning motivations influence engineering undergraduate students’ success outcomes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1