The Difficult Cholecystectomy: What You Need to Know.

Anupamaa Seshadri, Andrew B Peitzman
{"title":"The Difficult Cholecystectomy: What You Need to Know.","authors":"Anupamaa Seshadri, Andrew B Peitzman","doi":"10.1097/ta.0000000000004337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This review discusses the grading of cholecystitis, the optimal timing of cholecystectomy, adopting a culture of safe cholecystectomy, understanding the common error traps that can lead to intraoperative complications and how to avoid them. The Tokyo Guidelines, AAST, Nassar and Parkland scoring systems are discussed. The patient factors, physiologic status and operative findings that predict a difficult cholecystectomy or conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy are reviewed. With laparoscopic expertise and patient conditions that are not prohibitive, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recommended. This is ideally within 72 hours of admission but supported up to the seventh hospital day. The majority of bile duct injuries (BDI) are due to misidentification of normal anatomy. Strasberg's four error traps and the zones of danger to avoid during a cholecystectomy are described. The review emphasizes the importance of a true critical view of safety (CVS) for identification of the anatomy. In up to 15% of operations for acute cholecystitis, a CVS cannot be achieved safely. Recognizing these conditions and changing your operative strategy are mandatory to avoid harm. The principles to follow for a safe cholecystectomy are discussed in detail. The cardinal message of this review is \"under challenging conditions, BDI can be minimized via either a subtotal cholecystectomy or top-down cholecystectomy if dissection in the hepatocystic triangle is avoided.\" (28) The most severe biliary/vascular injuries usually occur after conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indications and techniques for bailout procedures including the fenestrating and reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy are presented. Seven to ten percent of cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis currently result in subtotal cholecystectomy.","PeriodicalId":501845,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ta.0000000000004337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This review discusses the grading of cholecystitis, the optimal timing of cholecystectomy, adopting a culture of safe cholecystectomy, understanding the common error traps that can lead to intraoperative complications and how to avoid them. The Tokyo Guidelines, AAST, Nassar and Parkland scoring systems are discussed. The patient factors, physiologic status and operative findings that predict a difficult cholecystectomy or conversion from laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy are reviewed. With laparoscopic expertise and patient conditions that are not prohibitive, early laparoscopic cholecystectomy is recommended. This is ideally within 72 hours of admission but supported up to the seventh hospital day. The majority of bile duct injuries (BDI) are due to misidentification of normal anatomy. Strasberg's four error traps and the zones of danger to avoid during a cholecystectomy are described. The review emphasizes the importance of a true critical view of safety (CVS) for identification of the anatomy. In up to 15% of operations for acute cholecystitis, a CVS cannot be achieved safely. Recognizing these conditions and changing your operative strategy are mandatory to avoid harm. The principles to follow for a safe cholecystectomy are discussed in detail. The cardinal message of this review is "under challenging conditions, BDI can be minimized via either a subtotal cholecystectomy or top-down cholecystectomy if dissection in the hepatocystic triangle is avoided." (28) The most severe biliary/vascular injuries usually occur after conversion from laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Indications and techniques for bailout procedures including the fenestrating and reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy are presented. Seven to ten percent of cholecystectomies for acute cholecystitis currently result in subtotal cholecystectomy.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
疑难胆囊切除术:您需要了解的知识。
本综述讨论了胆囊炎的分级、胆囊切除术的最佳时机、采用安全胆囊切除术的文化、了解可导致术中并发症的常见错误陷阱以及如何避免这些错误。讨论了东京指南、AAST、Nassar 和 Parkland 评分系统。回顾了预测胆囊切除术困难或从腹腔镜胆囊切除术转为开腹胆囊切除术的患者因素、生理状态和手术结果。在腹腔镜专业技术和患者条件允许的情况下,建议尽早进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。腹腔镜胆囊切除术最好在患者入院后 72 小时内进行,但也支持在住院第七天内进行。大多数胆管损伤 (BDI) 都是由于对正常解剖结构的错误识别造成的。文中介绍了 Strasberg 的四个错误陷阱和胆囊切除术中应避免的危险区域。评论强调了真正的安全关键视图(CVS)对于识别解剖结构的重要性。在多达 15% 的急性胆囊炎手术中,无法安全地进行 CVS。认识到这些情况并改变手术策略是避免伤害的必要条件。本文详细讨论了安全胆囊切除术应遵循的原则。本综述的主要信息是 "在具有挑战性的条件下,如果避免在肝囊肿三角区进行解剖,可以通过胆囊次全切除术或自上而下胆囊切除术将 BDI 降到最低"。(28)最严重的胆道/血管损伤通常发生在腹腔镜胆囊切除术后。本文介绍了保胆手术的适应症和技术,包括胆囊切除术和重组胆囊次全切除术。目前,在急性胆囊炎的胆囊切除术中,有 7% 到 10% 的胆囊切除术是次全胆囊切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Comparison of thoracic epidural catheter and continuous peripheral infusion for management of traumatic rib fracture pain. Bleeding control methods for kids: A pediatric approach to the national education campaign-a pilot program. Real-time attending trauma surgeon assessment of direct-to-operating room trauma resuscitations: Results from a prospective observational study. Whole blood to total transfusion volume ratio in injured children: A national database analysis. Contemporary Diagnosis and Management of Mild TBI (Concussions): What You Need to Know.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1