Machine Learning Model Based on the Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio Predicts the Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgery

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.2147/jhc.s455612
Guanming Shao, Yonghui Ma, Chao Qu, Ruiqian Gao, Chengzhan Zhu, Linlin Qu, Kui Liu, Na Li, Peng Sun, Jingyu Cao
{"title":"Machine Learning Model Based on the Neutrophil-to-Eosinophil Ratio Predicts the Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma After Surgery","authors":"Guanming Shao, Yonghui Ma, Chao Qu, Ruiqian Gao, Chengzhan Zhu, Linlin Qu, Kui Liu, Na Li, Peng Sun, Jingyu Cao","doi":"10.2147/jhc.s455612","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<strong>Background:</strong> Circulating eosinophils are associated with tumor development. An eosinophil-related index, the neutrophil to eosinophil ratio (NER), can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with tumors. However, there is still a lack of efficient prognostic biomarkers for HCC. In this study, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of the NER and develop an optimal machine learning model for the recurrence of HCC patients. Patients and methods: A retrospective collection of 562 patients who underwent hepatectomy with a pathologic diagnosis of HCC was performed. The relationship between NER and progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated. We developed a new machine learning framework with 10 machine learning algorithms and their 101 combinations to select the best model for predicting recurrence after hepatectomy. The performance of the model was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of characteristics and calibration curves, and clinical utility was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA).<br/><strong>Results:</strong> Kaplan‒Meier curves showed that the PFS in the low NER group was significantly better than that in the high NER group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that NER was an independent risk factor for recurrence after surgery. The random survival forests (RSF) model was selected as the best model that had good predictive efficacy and outperformed the TNM, BCLC, and CNLC staging systems.<br/><strong>Conclusion:</strong> The NER has good predictive value for postoperative recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Machine learning model based on NER can be used for accurate predictions.<br/><br/>","PeriodicalId":15906,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","volume":"150 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hepatocellular Carcinoma","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/jhc.s455612","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Circulating eosinophils are associated with tumor development. An eosinophil-related index, the neutrophil to eosinophil ratio (NER), can be used to predict the prognosis of patients with tumors. However, there is still a lack of efficient prognostic biomarkers for HCC. In this study, we aimed to investigate the predictive value of the NER and develop an optimal machine learning model for the recurrence of HCC patients. Patients and methods: A retrospective collection of 562 patients who underwent hepatectomy with a pathologic diagnosis of HCC was performed. The relationship between NER and progression-free survival (PFS) was investigated. We developed a new machine learning framework with 10 machine learning algorithms and their 101 combinations to select the best model for predicting recurrence after hepatectomy. The performance of the model was assessed by the area under the curve (AUC) of characteristics and calibration curves, and clinical utility was evaluated by decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results: Kaplan‒Meier curves showed that the PFS in the low NER group was significantly better than that in the high NER group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that NER was an independent risk factor for recurrence after surgery. The random survival forests (RSF) model was selected as the best model that had good predictive efficacy and outperformed the TNM, BCLC, and CNLC staging systems.
Conclusion: The NER has good predictive value for postoperative recurrence in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Machine learning model based on NER can be used for accurate predictions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于中性粒细胞与嗜酸性粒细胞比率的机器学习模型可预测肝细胞癌术后复发
背景:循环中的嗜酸性粒细胞与肿瘤的发展有关。嗜酸性粒细胞相关指数--中性粒细胞与嗜酸性粒细胞比值(NER)可用于预测肿瘤患者的预后。然而,目前仍缺乏有效的 HCC 预后生物标志物。在这项研究中,我们旨在调查嗜酸性粒细胞比值的预测价值,并为 HCC 患者的复发建立一个最佳的机器学习模型。患者和方法:我们回顾性地收集了562名接受肝切除术并经病理诊断为HCC的患者。我们研究了NER与无进展生存期(PFS)之间的关系。我们开发了一个新的机器学习框架,其中包含 10 种机器学习算法及其 101 种组合,以选择预测肝切除术后复发的最佳模型。通过特征曲线和校准曲线的曲线下面积(AUC)评估了模型的性能,并通过决策曲线分析(DCA)评估了临床实用性:Kaplan-Meier曲线显示,低NER组的PFS明显优于高NER组。多变量考克斯回归分析显示,NER是术后复发的独立风险因素。随机生存森林(RSF)模型被选为最佳模型,具有良好的预测效果,优于TNM、BCLC和CNLC分期系统:结论:NER 对肝细胞癌患者术后复发具有良好的预测价值。基于 NER 的机器学习模型可用于准确预测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
108
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Yiqi Liangxue Jiedu Prescription Inhibited the Canonical Wnt Pathway to Prevent Hepatocellular Precancerous Lesions. Sintilimab Plus Lenvatinib with or Without Radiotherapy for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Pulmonary Metastasis. Diabetes Mellitus Negatively Impacts Outcomes of HBV-Related Hepatocellular Carcinoma Following Thermal Ablation. scRNA-Seq Analysis Revealed CAFs Regulating HCC Cells via PTN Signaling. Construction of a 2.5D Deep Learning Model for Predicting Early Postoperative Recurrence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using Multi-View and Multi-Phase CT Images.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1