Nutritional status of people who inject drugs in Coastal Kenya: a cross-sectional study

IF 1.9 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS BMC Nutrition Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1186/s40795-024-00851-z
Valentine Budambula, Moses Ngari, Nancy L.M. Budambula, Aabid A. Ahmed, Tom Were
{"title":"Nutritional status of people who inject drugs in Coastal Kenya: a cross-sectional study","authors":"Valentine Budambula, Moses Ngari, Nancy L.M. Budambula, Aabid A. Ahmed, Tom Were","doi":"10.1186/s40795-024-00851-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite documentation on injection drug use (IDU) in Kenya, the nutritional status of people who inject drugs (PWIDs) is under-explored. Elsewhere studies report under-nutrition among PWIDs which is attributed to food insecurity; competing priorities between drugs and food supply; chaotic lifestyle; reduced food intake; substance use induced malnutrition due to inflammation and comorbidities. This was a cross-sectional study that sought to assess the nutritional status of PWIDs in Coastal Kenya. We recruited 752 participants of whom 371(49%) were on IDUs and 75 non-IDUs and 306 non-drug users using respondent driven sampling, traditional snowball, makeshift outreach and purposive sampling methods. More than one half of the participants (56%) had BMI classified as normal while 35% had BMI < 18.5. The proportion with BMI < 18.5 was higher among IDUs (46%) compared to the non-IDUs (33%) and non-drug users (23%) at P < 0.001. Using the mid upper arm circumference (MUAC), 17% were classified as underweight and the proportion was lowest (11%) among non- drugs users compared to 22% among IDUs (P < 0.001). However, the IDUs had lower proportion of overweight (8.1%) compared to 55% among the non- drug users. The proportion with low waist-for-hip ratio was highest among the IDUs (74%) while high waist-for-hip ratio was lowest in the same group of IDUs (11%) at P < 0.001. One half (50%), of the participants had no signs of anaemia, (47%) had mild/moderate anaemia while 21 (2.8%) had severe anaemia. However, IDUs were more likely to be overweight based on waist circumference as a parameter. The IDUs had the highest proportion (54%) of mild to moderate anaemia compared to non-IDUs (37%) and 40% non- drug users (P < 0.001). In the multivariable models, IDUs (aRRR 2.83 (95%CI 1.84‒4.35)) and non-IDUs (aRRR 1.42 (95%CI 1.07‒1.88)) compared to non- drug users were positively associated with BMI < 18.5. Being an IDU was positively associated with mild or moderate anaemia (aRRR 1.65 (95%CI 1.13‒2.41)) while non-IDUs were positively associated with severe anaemia (aRRR 1.69 (95%CI 1.16‒2.48)). A significant proportion of the participants were under-nourished with those injecting drugs bearing the heaviest brunt. Being an IDU was positively associated with the low BMI, MUAC, waist for hip ratio and mild or moderate anaemia but high waist circumference. People who inject drugs have high risk for under-nutrition and should be targeted with appropriate interventions.","PeriodicalId":36422,"journal":{"name":"BMC Nutrition","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40795-024-00851-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite documentation on injection drug use (IDU) in Kenya, the nutritional status of people who inject drugs (PWIDs) is under-explored. Elsewhere studies report under-nutrition among PWIDs which is attributed to food insecurity; competing priorities between drugs and food supply; chaotic lifestyle; reduced food intake; substance use induced malnutrition due to inflammation and comorbidities. This was a cross-sectional study that sought to assess the nutritional status of PWIDs in Coastal Kenya. We recruited 752 participants of whom 371(49%) were on IDUs and 75 non-IDUs and 306 non-drug users using respondent driven sampling, traditional snowball, makeshift outreach and purposive sampling methods. More than one half of the participants (56%) had BMI classified as normal while 35% had BMI < 18.5. The proportion with BMI < 18.5 was higher among IDUs (46%) compared to the non-IDUs (33%) and non-drug users (23%) at P < 0.001. Using the mid upper arm circumference (MUAC), 17% were classified as underweight and the proportion was lowest (11%) among non- drugs users compared to 22% among IDUs (P < 0.001). However, the IDUs had lower proportion of overweight (8.1%) compared to 55% among the non- drug users. The proportion with low waist-for-hip ratio was highest among the IDUs (74%) while high waist-for-hip ratio was lowest in the same group of IDUs (11%) at P < 0.001. One half (50%), of the participants had no signs of anaemia, (47%) had mild/moderate anaemia while 21 (2.8%) had severe anaemia. However, IDUs were more likely to be overweight based on waist circumference as a parameter. The IDUs had the highest proportion (54%) of mild to moderate anaemia compared to non-IDUs (37%) and 40% non- drug users (P < 0.001). In the multivariable models, IDUs (aRRR 2.83 (95%CI 1.84‒4.35)) and non-IDUs (aRRR 1.42 (95%CI 1.07‒1.88)) compared to non- drug users were positively associated with BMI < 18.5. Being an IDU was positively associated with mild or moderate anaemia (aRRR 1.65 (95%CI 1.13‒2.41)) while non-IDUs were positively associated with severe anaemia (aRRR 1.69 (95%CI 1.16‒2.48)). A significant proportion of the participants were under-nourished with those injecting drugs bearing the heaviest brunt. Being an IDU was positively associated with the low BMI, MUAC, waist for hip ratio and mild or moderate anaemia but high waist circumference. People who inject drugs have high risk for under-nutrition and should be targeted with appropriate interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚沿海地区注射吸毒者的营养状况:横断面研究
尽管肯尼亚有关于注射吸毒(IDU)的文献记载,但对注射吸毒者(PWIDs)的营养状况却缺乏深入研究。其他研究报告称,注射吸毒者营养不良的原因包括:食品不安全;毒品和食品供应之间的优先级竞争;混乱的生活方式;食物摄入量减少;炎症和合并症导致的药物使用引起的营养不良。这是一项横断面研究,旨在评估肯尼亚沿海地区吸毒者的营养状况。我们采用受访者驱动抽样、传统滚雪球抽样、临时外展抽样和目的性抽样等方法招募了 752 名参与者,其中 371 人(49%)为注射吸毒者,75 人为非注射吸毒者,306 人为非吸毒者。超过一半的参与者(56%)的体重指数被归类为正常,35%的参与者的体重指数小于 18.5。与非注射吸毒者(33%)和非吸毒者(23%)相比,注射吸毒者(46%)的体重指数小于 18.5 的比例更高(P < 0.001)。根据中上臂周长(MUAC),17%的人被归类为体重不足,非吸毒者中这一比例最低(11%),而注射毒品者中这一比例为22%(P < 0.001)。不过,与非吸毒者的 55% 相比,注射吸毒者的超重比例较低(8.1%)。腰臀比低的比例在注射吸毒者中最高(74%),而腰臀比高的比例在同组注射吸毒者中最低(11%),P < 0.001。一半(50%)的参与者没有贫血症状,(47%)有轻度/中度贫血,21 人(2.8%)有重度贫血。然而,根据腰围这一参数,注射吸毒者更有可能超重。与非注射吸毒者(37%)和非吸毒者(40%)相比,注射吸毒者轻度至中度贫血的比例最高(54%)(P < 0.001)。在多变量模型中,与非吸毒者相比,注射吸毒者(aRRR 2.83 (95%CI 1.84-4.35))和非注射吸毒者(aRRR 1.42 (95%CI 1.07-1.88))与体重指数小于 18.5 呈正相关。吸毒者与轻度或中度贫血呈正相关(aRRR 1.65 (95%CI 1.13-2.41)),而非吸毒者与重度贫血呈正相关(aRRR 1.69 (95%CI 1.16-2.48))。相当一部分参与者营养不良,其中注射吸毒者首当其冲。注射吸毒者与低体重指数(BMI)、中位数(MUAC)、腰臀比、轻度或中度贫血以及高腰围呈正相关。注射吸毒者营养不良的风险很高,应针对他们采取适当的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Nutrition
BMC Nutrition Medicine-Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
131
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association between maternal dietary diversity during pregnancy and birth outcomes: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis. Improving dietary diversity and food security among low-income families during financial crisis using cash transfers and mHealth: experience from two selected districts in Sri Lanka. Impact of baseline dietary quality on the efficacy of a dietitian-guided weight reduction program. Association between dietary intake of iron and heart failure among American adults: data from NHANES 2009-2018. Health outcomes reported by healthcare providers and clients of a community-based medically tailored meal program.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1