Designing an observation protocol for professional development providers and mentors working with scientific inquiry‐supported classroom settings

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH School Science and Mathematics Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1111/ssm.12657
Ayse Oguz Unver, Hasan Zuhtu Okulu, Onur Bektas, Yasemin Ozdem Yilmaz, Nilay Muslu, Burcu Senler, Sertac Arabacioglu
{"title":"Designing an observation protocol for professional development providers and mentors working with scientific inquiry‐supported classroom settings","authors":"Ayse Oguz Unver, Hasan Zuhtu Okulu, Onur Bektas, Yasemin Ozdem Yilmaz, Nilay Muslu, Burcu Senler, Sertac Arabacioglu","doi":"10.1111/ssm.12657","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Several observation protocols in different theoretical frameworks and components have been designed and validated by teacher trainers and professional development providers to capture and categorize observational data on the characteristics and level of inquiry in science practices. However, certain constraints limit their wide use, such as the neglect of certain indicators of scientific inquiry, the scoring of just summative goals, or the necessity for extensive observer training. The present study, therefore, aims to propose a tool that assists professional development providers and mentors in diagnosing the closeness of practices to scientific inquiry in the context of various settings, from traditional didactic lectures to scientific inquiry, making it easily operational for self and peer evaluations as well as 360‐degree video feedback. The method concentrated on multiple observations provides supportive evidence about the tool's internal consistency coefficient, the relationship between its components, and the inter‐rater reliability coefficient between multiple scorers. The results highlight that the tool, which includes the components of course structure, course overview, and teacher–student communication, has the potential to contribute to the growing library of observation protocols.","PeriodicalId":47540,"journal":{"name":"School Science and Mathematics","volume":"31 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"School Science and Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12657","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Several observation protocols in different theoretical frameworks and components have been designed and validated by teacher trainers and professional development providers to capture and categorize observational data on the characteristics and level of inquiry in science practices. However, certain constraints limit their wide use, such as the neglect of certain indicators of scientific inquiry, the scoring of just summative goals, or the necessity for extensive observer training. The present study, therefore, aims to propose a tool that assists professional development providers and mentors in diagnosing the closeness of practices to scientific inquiry in the context of various settings, from traditional didactic lectures to scientific inquiry, making it easily operational for self and peer evaluations as well as 360‐degree video feedback. The method concentrated on multiple observations provides supportive evidence about the tool's internal consistency coefficient, the relationship between its components, and the inter‐rater reliability coefficient between multiple scorers. The results highlight that the tool, which includes the components of course structure, course overview, and teacher–student communication, has the potential to contribute to the growing library of observation protocols.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为在科学探究支持的课堂环境中工作的专业发展提供者和指导者设计观察规程
教师培训者和专业发展提供者设计并验证了不同理论框架和组成部分的几种观察规程,以获取有关科学实践中探究的特点和水平的观察数据并进行分类。然而,某些制约因素限制了它们的广泛应用,如忽视了科学探究的某些指标、只对终结性目标进行评分,或必须对观察者进行广泛的培训。因此,本研究旨在提出一种工具,帮助专业发展提供者和指导者诊断从传统说教到科学探究等各种环境下的实践与科学探究的密切程度,使其易于自我和同行评价以及 360 度视频反馈操作。集中于多重观察的方法为工具的内部一致性系数、各组成部分之间的关系以及多个评分者之间的评分可靠性系数提供了支持性证据。研究结果表明,该工具包括课程结构、课程概述和师生交流等组成部分,有望为不断扩大的观察协议库做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
School Science and Mathematics
School Science and Mathematics EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Impacting elementary STEM teacher leadership identities Fostering students' inquiry aptitudes and collaborative reasoning in higher education science courses with social annotation tools and collaborative platforms Re‐imagining professional learning communities in education: Placing teacher leadership in STEM context Support for collective argumentation in integrated STEM: A study of elementary teachers' practice What does a scientist look like? Children's perceptions of scientist gender and skin tone
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1