Impact of billing reforms on academic hospitalist physician and advanced practice provider collaboration: A qualitative study

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of hospital medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1002/jhm.13356
Sara Westergaard MD, MPH, Kasey Bowden MSN, FNP, AG-ACNP, Gopi J. Astik MD, MS, Greg Bowling MD, Angela Keniston PhD, MSPH, Anne Linker MD, Matthew Sakumoto MD, Natalie Schwatka PhD, Andrew Auerbach MD, Marisha Burden MD, MBA
{"title":"Impact of billing reforms on academic hospitalist physician and advanced practice provider collaboration: A qualitative study","authors":"Sara Westergaard MD, MPH,&nbsp;Kasey Bowden MSN, FNP, AG-ACNP,&nbsp;Gopi J. Astik MD, MS,&nbsp;Greg Bowling MD,&nbsp;Angela Keniston PhD, MSPH,&nbsp;Anne Linker MD,&nbsp;Matthew Sakumoto MD,&nbsp;Natalie Schwatka PhD,&nbsp;Andrew Auerbach MD,&nbsp;Marisha Burden MD, MBA","doi":"10.1002/jhm.13356","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Medicare previously announced plans for new billing reforms for inpatient visits that are shared by physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) whereby the clinician spending the most time on the patient visit would bill for the visit.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>To understand how inpatient hospital medicine teams utilize APPs in patient care and how the proposed billing policies might impact future APP utilization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Design, Setting and Participants</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted focus groups with hospitalist physicians, APPs, and other leaders from 21 academic hospitals across the United States. Utilizing rapid qualitative methods, focus groups were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive method at the semantic level with templated summaries and matrix analysis. Thirty-three individuals (physicians [<i>n</i> = 21], APPs [<i>n</i> = 10], practice manager [<i>n</i> = 1], and patient representative [<i>n</i> = 1]) participated in six focus groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Four themes emerged from the analysis of the focus groups, including: (1) staffing models with APPs are rapidly evolving, (2) these changes were felt to be driven by staffing shortages, financial models, and governance with minimal consideration to teamwork and relationships, (3) time-based billing was perceived to value tasks over cognitive workload, and (4) that the proposed billing changes may create unintended consequences impacting collaboration and professional satisfaction.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Physician and APP collaborative care models are increasingly evolving to independent visits often driven by workloads, financial drivers, and local regulations such as medical staff rules and hospital bylaws. Understanding which staffing models produce optimal patient, clinician, and organizational outcomes should inform billing policies rather than the reverse.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":15883,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hospital medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jhm.13356","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hospital medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jhm.13356","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Medicare previously announced plans for new billing reforms for inpatient visits that are shared by physicians and advanced practice providers (APPs) whereby the clinician spending the most time on the patient visit would bill for the visit.

Objective

To understand how inpatient hospital medicine teams utilize APPs in patient care and how the proposed billing policies might impact future APP utilization.

Design, Setting and Participants

We conducted focus groups with hospitalist physicians, APPs, and other leaders from 21 academic hospitals across the United States. Utilizing rapid qualitative methods, focus groups were analyzed using a mixed inductive and deductive method at the semantic level with templated summaries and matrix analysis. Thirty-three individuals (physicians [n = 21], APPs [n = 10], practice manager [n = 1], and patient representative [n = 1]) participated in six focus groups.

Results

Four themes emerged from the analysis of the focus groups, including: (1) staffing models with APPs are rapidly evolving, (2) these changes were felt to be driven by staffing shortages, financial models, and governance with minimal consideration to teamwork and relationships, (3) time-based billing was perceived to value tasks over cognitive workload, and (4) that the proposed billing changes may create unintended consequences impacting collaboration and professional satisfaction.

Conclusions

Physician and APP collaborative care models are increasingly evolving to independent visits often driven by workloads, financial drivers, and local regulations such as medical staff rules and hospital bylaws. Understanding which staffing models produce optimal patient, clinician, and organizational outcomes should inform billing policies rather than the reverse.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
计费改革对学术医院医生和高级医疗服务提供者合作的影响:定性研究
此前,医疗保险计划对由医生和高级医疗服务提供者(APP)共同承担的住院病人就诊费用进行新的计费改革,即由在病人就诊过程中花费时间最长的临床医生支付就诊费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hospital medicine
Journal of hospital medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
11.50%
发文量
233
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JHM is a peer-reviewed publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine and is published 12 times per year. JHM publishes manuscripts that address the care of hospitalized adults or children. Broad areas of interest include (1) Treatments for common inpatient conditions; (2) Approaches to improving perioperative care; (3) Improving care for hospitalized patients with geriatric or pediatric vulnerabilities (such as mobility problems, or those with complex longitudinal care); (4) Evaluation of innovative healthcare delivery or educational models; (5) Approaches to improving the quality, safety, and value of healthcare across the acute- and postacute-continuum of care; and (6) Evaluation of policy and payment changes that affect hospital and postacute care.
期刊最新文献
Career development committees: A guide for early- and mid-career faculty. Lessons from patient safety to accelerate healthcare decarbonization Issue Information Issue Information Your service, our gratitude: A thank you to our peer reviewers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1