Management of groin hernia repair in Sweden: A register-based comparative analysis of public and private healthcare providers

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 SURGERY Scandinavian Journal of Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1177/14574969241242312
Anders Hemberg, Jakob Landén, Agneta Montgomery, Henrik Holmberg, Pär Nordin
{"title":"Management of groin hernia repair in Sweden: A register-based comparative analysis of public and private healthcare providers","authors":"Anders Hemberg, Jakob Landén, Agneta Montgomery, Henrik Holmberg, Pär Nordin","doi":"10.1177/14574969241242312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Swedish healthcare is in a period of transition with an expanding private sector. This study compares quality of outcome after groin hernia repair performed in a public or private healthcare setting.Methods:A cohort study based on data from the Swedish National Hernia Register combined with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) 1 year after groin hernia repair. Between September 2012 and December 2018, a questionnaire was sent to all patients registered in the hernia register 1 year after surgery. Endpoints were reoperation for recurrence, chronic pain, and patient satisfaction.Results:From a total of 87,650 patients with unilateral groin hernia repair, 61,337 PROM answers (70%) were received from 71 public and 28 private healthcare providers. More females, acute and recurrent cases, and patients with high American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores were operated under the national healthcare system. The private sector had more experience surgeons with higher annual volume per surgeon, shorter time on waiting lists, and shorter operation times. No difference was seen in patient satisfaction. Groin hernia repair performed in a private clinic was associated with less postoperative chronic pain (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.8–0.91) but a higher recurrence rate (HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.26–1.59) in a multivariable logistic regression analysis.Conclusion:Despite private clinics having a higher proportion of experienced surgeons and fewer complex cases, the recurrence rate was higher, whereas the risk for chronic postoperative pain was higher among patients treated in the public sector.","PeriodicalId":49566,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","volume":"62 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/14574969241242312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Swedish healthcare is in a period of transition with an expanding private sector. This study compares quality of outcome after groin hernia repair performed in a public or private healthcare setting.Methods:A cohort study based on data from the Swedish National Hernia Register combined with Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) 1 year after groin hernia repair. Between September 2012 and December 2018, a questionnaire was sent to all patients registered in the hernia register 1 year after surgery. Endpoints were reoperation for recurrence, chronic pain, and patient satisfaction.Results:From a total of 87,650 patients with unilateral groin hernia repair, 61,337 PROM answers (70%) were received from 71 public and 28 private healthcare providers. More females, acute and recurrent cases, and patients with high American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) scores were operated under the national healthcare system. The private sector had more experience surgeons with higher annual volume per surgeon, shorter time on waiting lists, and shorter operation times. No difference was seen in patient satisfaction. Groin hernia repair performed in a private clinic was associated with less postoperative chronic pain (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.8–0.91) but a higher recurrence rate (HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.26–1.59) in a multivariable logistic regression analysis.Conclusion:Despite private clinics having a higher proportion of experienced surgeons and fewer complex cases, the recurrence rate was higher, whereas the risk for chronic postoperative pain was higher among patients treated in the public sector.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
瑞典腹股沟疝修补术的管理:对公立和私立医疗机构的登记比较分析
背景:随着私营医疗机构的不断扩大,瑞典的医疗服务正处于转型期。本研究比较了在公立或私立医疗机构进行腹股沟疝修补术后的疗效质量。方法:根据瑞典国家疝气登记处的数据,结合腹股沟疝修补术后 1 年的患者报告结果指标(PROMs),进行一项队列研究。2012年9月至2018年12月期间,向所有在疝气登记处登记的术后1年患者发放了调查问卷。结果:在87650名单侧腹股沟疝修补术患者中,共收到来自71家公立医疗机构和28家私立医疗机构的61337份PROM答卷(占70%)。在公立医疗机构接受手术的女性、急性和复发性病例以及美国麻醉学会(ASA)评分较高的患者较多。私立医疗机构的外科医生经验更丰富,人均年手术量更高、候诊时间更短、手术时间更短。在患者满意度方面没有差异。在多变量逻辑回归分析中,在私立诊所进行腹股沟疝修补术的患者术后慢性疼痛较少(OR 0.85,95% CI 0.8-0.91),但复发率较高(HR 1.41;95% CI 1.26-1.59)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.20%
发文量
37
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Surgery (SJS) is the official peer reviewed journal of the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society. It publishes original and review articles from all surgical fields and specialties to reflect the interests of our diverse and international readership that consists of surgeons from all specialties and continents.
期刊最新文献
A randomized double-blind noninferiority clinical multicenter trial on oral moxifloxacin versus placebo in the outpatient treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: APPAC IV study protocol. Modern surgical treatments for lymphedema. Impact of oral administration of calcitriol to prevent symptomatic hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. 16-year outcomes of blunt thoracic aortic injury treated with thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A single-institution experience. Reducing the risk of cancer with bariatric surgery: The need for evidence to guide practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1