Current trends for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis for hip arthroscopy: a modified Delphi and nominal group technique consensus study

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1093/jhps/hnae014
Ali Parsa, Asheesh Bedi, Benjamin G Domb
{"title":"Current trends for venous thromboembolic prophylaxis for hip arthroscopy: a modified Delphi and nominal group technique consensus study","authors":"Ali Parsa, Asheesh Bedi, Benjamin G Domb","doi":"10.1093/jhps/hnae014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The overall risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hip arthroscopy (HA) is reported to range from 0.2% to 9.5%, but a clear set of recommendations for VTE prophylaxis in HA patients remains scarce. The aim is to survey high-volume hip arthroscopists about their current trends regarding VTE prophylaxis use. A combination of two consensus group methods was used in this study: nominal group technique (NGT) and modified Delphi. A preliminary questionnaire was prepared, and rounds of discussion were completed between NGT members. The final version of the survey was administered to 35 high-volume hip surgeons. Delegates’ mean volume of annual hip arthroscopic surgery was 109. Approximately 22% of their patients are revision HA procedures. A total of 91.4% of delegates use chemoprophylaxis, 28.6% use sequential compression devices and 91.4% believed that chemoprophylaxis is necessary for more prolonged and complex procedures (strong consensus). Aspirin was the choice for all participants, and the duration was 2–3 weeks (31.4%), 1 month (65.7%) and 2–3 months (2.9%). History of VTE, hypercoagulable status, and malignancy were considered risk factors. No consensus was achieved for the discontinuation of oral contraceptive and smoking preoperatively. However, the optimal length of VTE prophylaxis is unclear. A total of 97.1% of the experts responded that they administer aspirin between 2 and 4 weeks. High-volume arthroscopic surgeons do consider VTE prophylaxis to be important and warranted in the postoperative setting. Aspirin is the mainstay of chemoprophylaxis, although the appropriate duration is unknown.","PeriodicalId":48583,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hip Preservation Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jhps/hnae014","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The overall risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) after hip arthroscopy (HA) is reported to range from 0.2% to 9.5%, but a clear set of recommendations for VTE prophylaxis in HA patients remains scarce. The aim is to survey high-volume hip arthroscopists about their current trends regarding VTE prophylaxis use. A combination of two consensus group methods was used in this study: nominal group technique (NGT) and modified Delphi. A preliminary questionnaire was prepared, and rounds of discussion were completed between NGT members. The final version of the survey was administered to 35 high-volume hip surgeons. Delegates’ mean volume of annual hip arthroscopic surgery was 109. Approximately 22% of their patients are revision HA procedures. A total of 91.4% of delegates use chemoprophylaxis, 28.6% use sequential compression devices and 91.4% believed that chemoprophylaxis is necessary for more prolonged and complex procedures (strong consensus). Aspirin was the choice for all participants, and the duration was 2–3 weeks (31.4%), 1 month (65.7%) and 2–3 months (2.9%). History of VTE, hypercoagulable status, and malignancy were considered risk factors. No consensus was achieved for the discontinuation of oral contraceptive and smoking preoperatively. However, the optimal length of VTE prophylaxis is unclear. A total of 97.1% of the experts responded that they administer aspirin between 2 and 4 weeks. High-volume arthroscopic surgeons do consider VTE prophylaxis to be important and warranted in the postoperative setting. Aspirin is the mainstay of chemoprophylaxis, although the appropriate duration is unknown.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
髋关节镜手术静脉血栓栓塞预防的当前趋势:改良德尔菲和名义小组技术共识研究
据报道,髋关节镜(HA)术后发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的总体风险在 0.2% 到 9.5% 之间,但关于 HA 患者 VTE 预防的一系列明确建议仍然很少。我们的目的是调查工作量大的髋关节镜医生目前使用 VTE 预防措施的趋势。本研究结合使用了两种共识小组方法:名义小组技术(NGT)和改良德尔菲法。我们准备了一份初步调查问卷,并在 NGT 成员之间进行了多轮讨论。最终版本的调查问卷由 35 名工作量大的髋关节外科医生填写。代表们每年髋关节镜手术的平均数量为 109 例。他们的患者中约有 22% 接受过髋关节镜翻修手术。91.4%的代表使用化学预防,28.6%的代表使用连续加压装置,91.4%的代表认为化学预防对于更长时间和更复杂的手术是必要的(强烈共识)。阿司匹林是所有与会者的选择,持续时间分别为 2-3 周(31.4%)、1 个月(65.7%)和 2-3 个月(2.9%)。有 VTE 病史、高凝状态和恶性肿瘤被认为是风险因素。关于术前停用口服避孕药和禁烟,尚未达成共识。然而,预防 VTE 的最佳时间尚不明确。97.1%的专家回答说他们会在 2 到 4 周内服用阿司匹林。工作量大的关节镜外科医生确实认为 VTE 预防很重要,而且在术后环境中也有必要。阿司匹林是化学预防的主要药物,但适当的用药时间尚不清楚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
20.00%
发文量
45
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Is core decompression and bone marrow concentrate with demineralized bone matrix and platelet-rich fibrin suitable for treating femoral head osteonecrosis? Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment questionnaire specifically tailored for greater trochanteric pain syndrome for the Dutch population Self-reported preoperative anxiety and depression associated with worse patient-reported outcomes for periacetabular osteotomy and hip arthroscopy surgery Comparing outcomes of hip arthroscopy and periacetabular osteotomy for the treatment of borderline hip dysplasia: a systematic review Hip dysplasia-the Bernese contribution continues.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1