A novel approach to reducing hepatotoxicity related to fungal prophylaxis in pediatric lung transplant recipients

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 PEDIATRICS Pediatric Transplantation Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1111/petr.14740
Caroline Patz‐Sobczak, Jennifer Young, Dawn Bunton, Cadence Kuklinski, Michele Estabrook
{"title":"A novel approach to reducing hepatotoxicity related to fungal prophylaxis in pediatric lung transplant recipients","authors":"Caroline Patz‐Sobczak, Jennifer Young, Dawn Bunton, Cadence Kuklinski, Michele Estabrook","doi":"10.1111/petr.14740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundPediatric lung transplant patients are at risk for developing invasive fungal infections post‐transplant. No consensus exists on optimal antifungal regimens and voriconazole, a common first‐line agent, has been shown to cause hepatotoxicity. We describe a single‐center experience utilizing a novel antifungal regimen of intravenous micafungin and nebulized amphotericin B immediately post‐transplant with conversion to an azole at the time of hospital discharge and compare it to a historical cohort of patients who received voriconazole monotherapy throughout their immediate post‐operative course.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of patients in the age 0–18 who received a lung transplant from June 2016–May 2021. Data points collected included: demographic data, transplant date and discharge date, <jats:italic>Aspergillus</jats:italic> colonization, type of lung transplant, hospitalization and level of care information, induction and antifungal medication regimen; AST, ALT, GGT, bilirubin, and direct bilirubin at various timepoints; and respiratory and blood culture results. The two patient groups were compared by assessment of changes in LFTs and culture results.ResultsForty‐two patients were included in the analysis, with 24 patients receiving micafungin and nebulized amphotericin and 18 patients receiving voriconazole. All patients in both groups experienced a post‐operative elevation in at least one transaminase or bilirubin. More patients in the micafungin/amphotericin group had resolution of all abnormal LFTs by 1 month post‐transplant (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .036). Additionally, patients in the micafungin/amphotericin group experienced faster normalization of their LFTs compared with the voriconazole group (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> &lt; .001). Ten patients in the micafungin/amphotericin group and five patients in the voriconazole group were found to have fungal growth on culture post‐transplant, but this difference was not found to be statistically significant (<jats:italic>p</jats:italic> = .507).ConclusionsAn antifungal regimen of micafungin and nebulized amphotericin B liposomal may be useful at decreasing the duration of elevated liver enzymes in pediatric patients in the immediate post‐lung transplant period when compared with voriconazole monotherapy. Larger prospective studies looking at antifungal regimens in pediatric patients post‐lung transplant are warranted.","PeriodicalId":20038,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Transplantation","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Transplantation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.14740","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundPediatric lung transplant patients are at risk for developing invasive fungal infections post‐transplant. No consensus exists on optimal antifungal regimens and voriconazole, a common first‐line agent, has been shown to cause hepatotoxicity. We describe a single‐center experience utilizing a novel antifungal regimen of intravenous micafungin and nebulized amphotericin B immediately post‐transplant with conversion to an azole at the time of hospital discharge and compare it to a historical cohort of patients who received voriconazole monotherapy throughout their immediate post‐operative course.MethodsThis is a retrospective review of patients in the age 0–18 who received a lung transplant from June 2016–May 2021. Data points collected included: demographic data, transplant date and discharge date, Aspergillus colonization, type of lung transplant, hospitalization and level of care information, induction and antifungal medication regimen; AST, ALT, GGT, bilirubin, and direct bilirubin at various timepoints; and respiratory and blood culture results. The two patient groups were compared by assessment of changes in LFTs and culture results.ResultsForty‐two patients were included in the analysis, with 24 patients receiving micafungin and nebulized amphotericin and 18 patients receiving voriconazole. All patients in both groups experienced a post‐operative elevation in at least one transaminase or bilirubin. More patients in the micafungin/amphotericin group had resolution of all abnormal LFTs by 1 month post‐transplant (p = .036). Additionally, patients in the micafungin/amphotericin group experienced faster normalization of their LFTs compared with the voriconazole group (p < .001). Ten patients in the micafungin/amphotericin group and five patients in the voriconazole group were found to have fungal growth on culture post‐transplant, but this difference was not found to be statistically significant (p = .507).ConclusionsAn antifungal regimen of micafungin and nebulized amphotericin B liposomal may be useful at decreasing the duration of elevated liver enzymes in pediatric patients in the immediate post‐lung transplant period when compared with voriconazole monotherapy. Larger prospective studies looking at antifungal regimens in pediatric patients post‐lung transplant are warranted.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
减少小儿肺移植受者与真菌预防相关的肝毒性的新方法
背景小儿肺移植患者在移植后有发生侵袭性真菌感染的风险。目前尚未就最佳抗真菌治疗方案达成共识,而常用的一线药物伏立康唑已被证实会导致肝中毒。我们描述了一项单中心经验,即在移植术后立即使用静脉注射米卡芬净和雾化两性霉素 B 的新型抗真菌方案,并在出院时转为使用唑类药物,并将其与在术后立即接受伏立康唑单药治疗的患者历史队列进行比较。收集的数据点包括:人口统计学数据、移植日期和出院日期、曲霉菌定植、肺移植类型、住院和护理级别信息、诱导和抗真菌药物治疗方案;不同时间点的谷丙转氨酶(AST)、谷草转氨酶(ALT)、谷草转氨酶(GGT)、胆红素和直接胆红素;以及呼吸道和血液培养结果。通过评估 LFT 和培养结果的变化,对两组患者进行比较。结果分析共纳入 42 名患者,其中 24 名患者接受米卡芬净和雾化两性霉素治疗,18 名患者接受伏立康唑治疗。两组患者术后均出现至少一种转氨酶或胆红素升高。米卡芬净/两性霉素组中有更多的患者在移植后 1 个月内所有 LFT 异常都得到了缓解(p = 0.036)。此外,与伏立康唑组相比,米卡芬净/两性霉素组患者的 LFT 正常化速度更快(p <.001)。结论与伏立康唑单药治疗相比,米卡芬净和雾化两性霉素 B 脂质体的抗真菌治疗方案可能有助于缩短儿童患者肺移植术后肝酶升高的持续时间。有必要对肺移植术后儿童患者的抗真菌治疗方案进行更大规模的前瞻性研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Transplantation
Pediatric Transplantation 医学-小儿科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
15.40%
发文量
216
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The aim of Pediatric Transplantation is to publish original articles of the highest quality on clinical experience and basic research in transplantation of tissues and solid organs in infants, children and adolescents. The journal seeks to disseminate the latest information widely to all individuals involved in kidney, liver, heart, lung, intestine and stem cell (bone-marrow) transplantation. In addition, the journal publishes focused reviews on topics relevant to pediatric transplantation as well as timely editorial comment on controversial issues.
期刊最新文献
Donor Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Heart Transplantation in South Korea. Outcomes of Pediatric Liver Transplantation in Glycogen Storage Disease Type 1b-A Single-Center Experience. Cardiovascular Risk in Pediatric Renal Transplant Recipients. Liver Transplantation for Nijmegen Breakage Syndrome With Hepatic Malignancy and Hepatopulmonary Syndrome After Bone Marrow Transplantation: A Case Report. Pediatric Organ Donation: 16-Year Experience of PICU/ICU of a Third Level Hospital in Portugal, 2006-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1