Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire

IF 3.3 Q2 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY BMJ Open Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001298
Seyed Ali Ebrahimi, Zahra Mostafavian, Elahe Karazhian, Fereshteh Najafi, Rasam Mashoufi, Tooraj Zandbaf, Elham Mokhtari
{"title":"Validity and reliability of the Persian version of the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life questionnaire","authors":"Seyed Ali Ebrahimi, Zahra Mostafavian, Elahe Karazhian, Fereshteh Najafi, Rasam Mashoufi, Tooraj Zandbaf, Elham Mokhtari","doi":"10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001298","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) is one of the most widely used questionnaires for assessing typical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) symptoms. It is simple, concise, and treatment responsive, yet it has not been validated in the Persian language. This study aimed to translate the GERD-HRQL questionnaire into Persian and assess its validity and reliability. Design In this cross-sectional validation study, a team of gastroenterologists, general surgeons, and professional translators conducted the forward-backward translation. A gastroenterologist interviewed 10 patients with GORD to insure understandability of the questionnaire. Fifty-four patients with GORD and 60 patients with gastrointestinal complaints other than GORD were enrolled using convenience sampling method. To assess concurrent validity, patients with GORD completed the Persian GERD-HRQL and the WHO Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaires. To assess discriminant validity, GERD-HRQL scores were compared between GORD and non-GORD patients. After 2 weeks, the patients with GORD completed the GERD-HRQL questionnaire again to assess test–retest reliability. The internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. Results The mean age of the GORD participants was 36.90±10.44, and the majority were women (78%). All GERD-HRQL domains and total scores exhibited significant negative correlations with WHOQOL-BREF domains (ranging from −0.28 to −0.97). The GERD-HRQL scores were significantly different in GORD and non-GORD patients (p<0.001). Test and retest scores did not show any significant differences (p=0.49). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.85. Conclusion The Persian GERD-HRQL questionnaire is valid and reliable and can effectively assess the GORD symptoms in Persian-speaking individuals. Data are available upon reasonable request. Unnamed patient data are available upon request.","PeriodicalId":9235,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","volume":"85 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001298","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective The Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Health-Related Quality of Life (GERD-HRQL) is one of the most widely used questionnaires for assessing typical gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD) symptoms. It is simple, concise, and treatment responsive, yet it has not been validated in the Persian language. This study aimed to translate the GERD-HRQL questionnaire into Persian and assess its validity and reliability. Design In this cross-sectional validation study, a team of gastroenterologists, general surgeons, and professional translators conducted the forward-backward translation. A gastroenterologist interviewed 10 patients with GORD to insure understandability of the questionnaire. Fifty-four patients with GORD and 60 patients with gastrointestinal complaints other than GORD were enrolled using convenience sampling method. To assess concurrent validity, patients with GORD completed the Persian GERD-HRQL and the WHO Quality of Life Brief Version (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaires. To assess discriminant validity, GERD-HRQL scores were compared between GORD and non-GORD patients. After 2 weeks, the patients with GORD completed the GERD-HRQL questionnaire again to assess test–retest reliability. The internal consistency was measured using Cronbach’s alpha. Results The mean age of the GORD participants was 36.90±10.44, and the majority were women (78%). All GERD-HRQL domains and total scores exhibited significant negative correlations with WHOQOL-BREF domains (ranging from −0.28 to −0.97). The GERD-HRQL scores were significantly different in GORD and non-GORD patients (p<0.001). Test and retest scores did not show any significant differences (p=0.49). Cronbach’s alpha was 0.85. Conclusion The Persian GERD-HRQL questionnaire is valid and reliable and can effectively assess the GORD symptoms in Persian-speaking individuals. Data are available upon reasonable request. Unnamed patient data are available upon request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
波斯语版胃食管反流病健康相关生活质量问卷的有效性和可靠性
目的 胃食管反流病健康相关生活质量(GERD-HRQL)是评估典型胃食管反流病(GORD)症状最广泛使用的问卷之一。该问卷简单、简明,对治疗反应灵敏,但尚未在波斯语中得到验证。本研究旨在将 GERD-HRQL 问卷翻译成波斯语,并评估其有效性和可靠性。设计 在这项横断面验证研究中,由胃肠病学专家、普外科医生和专业翻译人员组成的团队进行了正向-反向翻译。一名胃肠病学专家对 10 名 GORD 患者进行了访谈,以确保问卷的可理解性。采用方便抽样法,共招募了 54 名 GORD 患者和 60 名 GORD 以外的胃肠道不适患者。为评估并发效度,胃食管反流患者填写了波斯文胃食管反流-HRQL 和世界卫生组织生活质量简易版(WHOQOL-BREF)问卷。为评估判别效度,对胃食管反流患者和非胃食管反流患者的 GERD-HRQL 评分进行了比较。2 周后,胃食管反流患者再次填写胃食管反流-HRQL 问卷,以评估重测可靠性。内部一致性采用 Cronbach's alpha 进行测量。结果 胃食管反流患者的平均年龄为(36.90±10.44)岁,大多数为女性(78%)。所有 GERD-HRQL 领域和总分均与 WHOQOL-BREF 领域呈显著负相关(范围从 -0.28 到 -0.97)。胃食管反流-HRQL得分在胃食管反流患者和非胃食管反流患者中存在显著差异(p<0.001)。测试和重测得分未显示任何显著差异(p=0.49)。Cronbach's alpha 为 0.85。结论 波斯语胃食管反流-HRQL 问卷有效可靠,能有效评估波斯语患者的胃食管反流症状。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。未具名患者数据可应要求提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Gastroenterology
BMJ Open Gastroenterology GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
3.20%
发文量
68
审稿时长
2 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Gastroenterology is an online-only, peer-reviewed, open access gastroenterology journal, dedicated to publishing high-quality medical research from all disciplines and therapeutic areas of gastroenterology. It is the open access companion journal of Gut and is co-owned by the British Society of Gastroenterology. The journal publishes all research study types, from study protocols to phase I trials to meta-analyses, including small or specialist studies. Publishing procedures are built around continuous publication, publishing research online as soon as the article is ready.
期刊最新文献
Predictors for colectomy in patients with acute severe ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Qualitative service evaluation of a multimodal pilot service for early detection of liver disease in high-risk groups: 'Alright My Liver?' Development of a nomogram for predicting pancreatic portal hypertension in patients with acute pancreatitis: a retrospective study. Exploring the feasibility of home-delivered capsule endoscopy with 5G support: innovations and carbon footprint insights. Mixed-method Irish study exploring the role of diet in IBD based on an online questionnaire and a patient panel opinion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1