Population fluctuations of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) in a landscape with cumulative clearcutting

IF 1.3 4区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY Mammal Research Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1007/s13364-024-00746-1
Thomas P. Sullivan, Druscilla S. Sullivan
{"title":"Population fluctuations of meadow voles (Microtus pennsylvanicus) in a landscape with cumulative clearcutting","authors":"Thomas P. Sullivan, Druscilla S. Sullivan","doi":"10.1007/s13364-024-00746-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We investigated the responses of meadow vole (<i>Microtus pennsylvanicus</i>) populations to cumulative clearcutting of coniferous forests during four <i>Periods</i> over a 42-year span from 1979 to 2020 near Summerland, British Columbia, Canada. This vole is a common inhabitant of moist meadows, grasslands, and early successional sites after forest clearcutting and wildfire and may damage plantation trees on reforestation sites. We tested three hypotheses (H) that populations of <i>M. pennsylvanicus</i> would (H<sub>1</sub>) increase in abundance and potentially fluctuate owing to the availability of early seral post-harvest habitats associated with cumulative clearcut harvesting; and (H<sub>2</sub>) be positively associated with mean cover of herbaceous vegetation on clearcut sites; and (H<sub>3</sub>) be at lower abundance when the long-tailed vole (<i>M. longicaudus</i>) is present at higher numbers. Overall, mean abundances of <i>M. pennsylvanicus</i> were generally low, and hence differences among <i>Periods</i> were not formally significant. Thus, H<sub>1</sub>, that meadow voles would increase in abundance on new clearcuts was not supported, except for <i>Period 2</i> with the highest mean density recorded at 14.3 voles/ha. There was some evidence of a 4-year multi-annual fluctuation in 1998 and 2002 in <i>Period 2</i>. Mean ground cover of total herbs, grasses, and shrubs were similar in <i>Periods 2</i> and <i>3</i>. However, meadow vole populations were dramatically different in these two <i>Periods</i>, with few meadow voles captured in <i>Period 3</i> and then a decline to extirpation in <i>Period 4</i>. Thus, H<sub>2</sub> was supported for <i>Period 2</i>, but not <i>Period 3</i>. Both species of voles were present at similarly low numbers (&lt; 5/ha) with fewer meadow voles in the three years of peak numbers (22–33/ha) of long-tailed voles, and hence this pattern provided weak support for H<sub>3</sub>. The lack of increases in meadow vole numbers post-cutting in <i>Periods 1</i>, <i>3</i>, and <i>4</i> may have been related to very high numbers of <i>M. longicaudus</i> in <i>Period </i><i>1</i> and possibly the advent of cattle grazing and drought conditions in <i>Periods 3</i> and <i>4</i>. Although the decline in <i>Microtus</i> on post-harvest forest sites may be beneficial for pest management and reforestation, such declines may have serious consequences for predator communities, biodiversity, and other ecological functions.</p>","PeriodicalId":56073,"journal":{"name":"Mammal Research","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mammal Research","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13364-024-00746-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We investigated the responses of meadow vole (Microtus pennsylvanicus) populations to cumulative clearcutting of coniferous forests during four Periods over a 42-year span from 1979 to 2020 near Summerland, British Columbia, Canada. This vole is a common inhabitant of moist meadows, grasslands, and early successional sites after forest clearcutting and wildfire and may damage plantation trees on reforestation sites. We tested three hypotheses (H) that populations of M. pennsylvanicus would (H1) increase in abundance and potentially fluctuate owing to the availability of early seral post-harvest habitats associated with cumulative clearcut harvesting; and (H2) be positively associated with mean cover of herbaceous vegetation on clearcut sites; and (H3) be at lower abundance when the long-tailed vole (M. longicaudus) is present at higher numbers. Overall, mean abundances of M. pennsylvanicus were generally low, and hence differences among Periods were not formally significant. Thus, H1, that meadow voles would increase in abundance on new clearcuts was not supported, except for Period 2 with the highest mean density recorded at 14.3 voles/ha. There was some evidence of a 4-year multi-annual fluctuation in 1998 and 2002 in Period 2. Mean ground cover of total herbs, grasses, and shrubs were similar in Periods 2 and 3. However, meadow vole populations were dramatically different in these two Periods, with few meadow voles captured in Period 3 and then a decline to extirpation in Period 4. Thus, H2 was supported for Period 2, but not Period 3. Both species of voles were present at similarly low numbers (< 5/ha) with fewer meadow voles in the three years of peak numbers (22–33/ha) of long-tailed voles, and hence this pattern provided weak support for H3. The lack of increases in meadow vole numbers post-cutting in Periods 1, 3, and 4 may have been related to very high numbers of M. longicaudus in Period 1 and possibly the advent of cattle grazing and drought conditions in Periods 3 and 4. Although the decline in Microtus on post-harvest forest sites may be beneficial for pest management and reforestation, such declines may have serious consequences for predator communities, biodiversity, and other ecological functions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
累积砍伐景观中草甸田鼠(Microtus pennsylvanicus)的种群波动
我们调查了加拿大不列颠哥伦比亚省夏姆兰市附近针叶林在 1979 年至 2020 年 42 年间的四个伐木期中草甸田鼠(Microtus pennsylvanicus)种群对累积伐木的反应。这种田鼠是森林砍伐和野火后潮湿草甸、草地和早期演替地点的常见居民,可能会破坏重新造林地点的人工林。我们测试了三个假设(H),即:(H1)由于存在与累计皆伐相关的早期新陈代谢后栖息地,笔山田鼠的数量会增加,并可能出现波动;(H2)与皆伐地草本植被的平均覆盖率呈正相关;(H3)当长尾田鼠(M. longicaudus)数量较多时,其数量会较少。总体而言,M. pennsylvanicus 的平均丰度普遍较低,因此不同时期之间的差异并不显著。因此,H1,即草地田鼠在新开垦地上的数量会增加,并没有得到支持,但第 2 期除外,其平均密度最高,达到 14.3 只/公顷。有证据表明,在 1998 年和 2002 年的第 2 阶段,草地田鼠的数量出现了 4 年多的波动。第 2 期和第 3 期草本植物、草和灌木的平均地面覆盖率相似。但是,草甸田鼠的数量在这两个时期却有很大不同,在第 3 个时期捕获的草甸田鼠数量很少,而在第 4 个时期则减少到绝迹。因此,H2 在时期 2 得到了支持,但在时期 3 却没有得到支持。在长尾田鼠数量最高的三年(22-33 只/公顷)中,两种田鼠的数量都很低(< 5 只/公顷),草甸田鼠的数量更少,因此这种模式对 H3 的支持较弱。在第 1、3 和 4 个时期,草甸田鼠的数量在砍伐后没有增加,这可能与第 1 个时期长尾田鼠的数量非常高有关,也可能与第 3 和 4 个时期牛群放牧和干旱条件有关。尽管采伐后森林地点的小蠹数量减少可能有利于害虫管理和重新造林,但这种减少可能会对捕食者群落、生物多样性和其他生态功能造成严重后果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mammal Research
Mammal Research ZOOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
6.70%
发文量
47
期刊介绍: Mammal Research, formerly published as Acta Theriologica, is an international journal of mammalogy, covering all aspects of mammalian biology. Long-since recognized as a leader in its field, the journal was founded in 1954, and has been exclusively published in English since 1967. The journal presents work from scientists all over the world, covering all aspects of mammalian biology: genetics, ecology, behaviour, bioenergetics, morphology, development, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, paleontology and evolution.
期刊最新文献
Foraging ecology of Alpine mountain hares and European hares in the Alps: is competition about food a driving force in overlapping elevations? Bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) of Ubajara National Park, Ceará, Brazil: a diversity assessment using complementary sampling methods Unraveling the origin of the wild pig (Sus scrofa Linnaeus, 1758) from the northwest Patagonian region: evidence of hybridization processes and a possible pure wild boar population in a protected area The rare rodent genus Rhagomys (Rodentia, Sigmodontinae): biogeographical patterns and description of a new species Hypoflexid function in the “trenchant heel” of carnassial teeth, with comments on talonid evolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1