Repair of radial tears of the lateral meniscus on a stable knee: Results at a minimum follow-up of 2 years

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103877
Rayane Benhenneda, Mohammad Alajji, Adrien Portet, Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet, Jean-Marie Fayard, Mathieu Thaunat
{"title":"Repair of radial tears of the lateral meniscus on a stable knee: Results at a minimum follow-up of 2 years","authors":"Rayane Benhenneda,&nbsp;Mohammad Alajji,&nbsp;Adrien Portet,&nbsp;Bertrand Sonnery-Cottet,&nbsp;Jean-Marie Fayard,&nbsp;Mathieu Thaunat","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2024.103877","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>In younger patients, meniscal repair is recommended for isolated lateral meniscus tears that are most often due to acute trauma. But there is little published data on the outcomes of repairing this specific type of lesion. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, report the failure rate of repairing radial tears of the lateral meniscus in stable knees and determine the risk factors for failure.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>All patients who had a stable knee and underwent arthroscopic repair of a radial lateral meniscus tear between April 2013 and December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Failure was defined as revision surgery for recurrence of symptoms (pain, locking) with intraoperative confirmation that the meniscus did not heal. The following data were collected: demographics (age, sex, BMI), time to surgery, clinical outcome scores (Tegner, Lysholm, IKDC), surgical details (repair technique, lesion zone, number of sutures).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Thirty patients were included having a mean age of 20.1<!--> <!-->years (14–31). The follow-up ranged from 24 to 110<!--> <!-->months (mean 66.8<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->25.2). An all-inside repair was done in 6 patients (20%); an outside-in technique was done in 17 patients (57%) and a combination of all-inside and outside-in was done in 7 patients (23%). Four patients (13%) had a recurrence of their symptoms later on, while participating in sports. All the recurrences were at the initial tear site. The time to revision surgery was 16, 19, 24 and 37<!--> <!-->months in these four patients (mean 24<!--> <!-->±<!--> <!-->9). All the other patients were able to resume sports at their pre-injury level. Significant improvement in the IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner functional scores were found between the preoperative and postoperative assessments. No statistically significant risk factors for failure were identified.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The functional healing rate after repair of a radial lateral meniscus tear in a stable knee was 86% at a mean follow-up of 5<!--> <!-->years, with the surgical technique having no impact on the long-term result. Most of the failures occurred within 2<!--> <!-->years of the repair procedure. We recommend repairing these tears as they have considerable healing potential.</p></div><div><h3>Level of evidence</h3><p>IV; retrospective observational cohort study.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187705682400104X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

In younger patients, meniscal repair is recommended for isolated lateral meniscus tears that are most often due to acute trauma. But there is little published data on the outcomes of repairing this specific type of lesion. The goal of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes, report the failure rate of repairing radial tears of the lateral meniscus in stable knees and determine the risk factors for failure.

Materials and methods

All patients who had a stable knee and underwent arthroscopic repair of a radial lateral meniscus tear between April 2013 and December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. Failure was defined as revision surgery for recurrence of symptoms (pain, locking) with intraoperative confirmation that the meniscus did not heal. The following data were collected: demographics (age, sex, BMI), time to surgery, clinical outcome scores (Tegner, Lysholm, IKDC), surgical details (repair technique, lesion zone, number of sutures).

Results

Thirty patients were included having a mean age of 20.1 years (14–31). The follow-up ranged from 24 to 110 months (mean 66.8 ± 25.2). An all-inside repair was done in 6 patients (20%); an outside-in technique was done in 17 patients (57%) and a combination of all-inside and outside-in was done in 7 patients (23%). Four patients (13%) had a recurrence of their symptoms later on, while participating in sports. All the recurrences were at the initial tear site. The time to revision surgery was 16, 19, 24 and 37 months in these four patients (mean 24 ± 9). All the other patients were able to resume sports at their pre-injury level. Significant improvement in the IKDC, Lysholm and Tegner functional scores were found between the preoperative and postoperative assessments. No statistically significant risk factors for failure were identified.

Discussion

The functional healing rate after repair of a radial lateral meniscus tear in a stable knee was 86% at a mean follow-up of 5 years, with the surgical technique having no impact on the long-term result. Most of the failures occurred within 2 years of the repair procedure. We recommend repairing these tears as they have considerable healing potential.

Level of evidence

IV; retrospective observational cohort study.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
修复稳定膝关节外侧半月板径向撕裂:至少随访两年的结果
对于年轻患者,建议对孤立的外侧半月板撕裂进行半月板修复,这种撕裂多由急性外伤引起。但关于这种特殊类型病变的修复效果,已发表的数据很少。本研究旨在评估临床疗效,报告稳定膝关节外侧半月板径向撕裂修复的失败率,并确定失败的风险因素。研究人员对2013年4月至2019年12月期间所有膝关节稳定并接受关节镜修复外侧半月板径向撕裂的患者进行了回顾性研究。失败的定义是因症状(疼痛、锁定)复发而进行的翻修手术,术中确认半月板未愈合。收集的数据包括:人口统计学(年龄、性别、体重指数)、手术时间、临床结果评分(Tegner、Lysholm、IKDC)、手术细节(修复技术、病变区域、缝合次数)。30 名患者的平均年龄为 20.1 岁(14-31 岁)。随访时间从 24 个月到 110 个月不等(平均为 66.8±25.2)。6名患者(20%)采用了全内侧修复术;17名患者(57%)采用了外入式修复术;7名患者(23%)采用了全内侧和外入式联合修复术。四名患者(13%)后来在参加运动时症状复发。所有复发部位都在最初的撕裂部位。这四名患者接受翻修手术的时间分别为 16、19、24 和 37 个月(平均 24±9)。所有其他患者都能恢复到受伤前的运动水平。术前和术后评估结果显示,IKDC、Lysholm 和 Tegner 功能评分均有显著改善。没有发现具有统计学意义的失败风险因素。在平均 5 年的随访中,稳定膝关节径向外侧半月板撕裂修复术后的功能愈合率为 86%,手术技术对长期效果没有影响。大多数失败发生在修复手术后的两年内。我们建议对这些撕裂进行修复,因为它们具有相当大的愈合潜力。IV;回顾性观察队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Contents Diagnostic criteria of forearm chronic exertional compartment syndrome: a systematic review. Lag screw versus locking plate fixation for traumatic displaced medial malleolar fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. What does the SOFCOT-RENACOT 2024 hip prosthesis register tell us?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1