16S rRNA sequencing reveals microbiota differences in orthopedic implants between aseptic loosening and prosthetic joint infection cases.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q4 IMMUNOLOGY Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica Pub Date : 2024-04-15 DOI:10.1556/030.2024.02265
Omer Faruk Cetiner, Mehmet Hora, Ibrahim Halil Kafadar, Aysegul Ulu Kilic, Aycan Gundogdu
{"title":"16S rRNA sequencing reveals microbiota differences in orthopedic implants between aseptic loosening and prosthetic joint infection cases.","authors":"Omer Faruk Cetiner, Mehmet Hora, Ibrahim Halil Kafadar, Aysegul Ulu Kilic, Aycan Gundogdu","doi":"10.1556/030.2024.02265","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening (AL) are common complications of total joint arthroplasty. An accumulation of evidence indicates the presence of microbial communities on prosthetic implants, but the overall microbial profile is unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences in the microbial composition of prosthetic implants obtained from PJI and AL patients using the 16S rRNA sequencing method. Patients who underwent revision hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty caused by PJI (n = 20) or AL (n = 10) were enrolled in the study. 16S rRNA sequencing targeting the V3-V4 region was performed on the microbial specimens collected from synovial fluid, periprosthetic deep-tissue, and biofilm during the revision surgery. The sequenced raw data were analysed for microbial composition and ecological and differential abundance analyses using bioinformatics tools. The AL group had relatively balanced and higher diversity, with Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella being prominent. In the PJI group, Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were predominant, especially in deep-tissue samples and biofilm samples, respectively. The differential abundance analysis identified 15 and 2 distinctive taxa in the AL and PJI groups, respectively. Our findings provided preliminary insights supporting the existence of periprosthetic microbiota in orthopedic implants and explaining the differences in microbial composition between the AL and PJI groups.","PeriodicalId":7119,"journal":{"name":"Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta microbiologica et immunologica Hungarica","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/030.2024.02265","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Prosthetic joint infection (PJI) and aseptic loosening (AL) are common complications of total joint arthroplasty. An accumulation of evidence indicates the presence of microbial communities on prosthetic implants, but the overall microbial profile is unclear. In this study, we aimed to investigate the differences in the microbial composition of prosthetic implants obtained from PJI and AL patients using the 16S rRNA sequencing method. Patients who underwent revision hip, knee, or shoulder arthroplasty caused by PJI (n = 20) or AL (n = 10) were enrolled in the study. 16S rRNA sequencing targeting the V3-V4 region was performed on the microbial specimens collected from synovial fluid, periprosthetic deep-tissue, and biofilm during the revision surgery. The sequenced raw data were analysed for microbial composition and ecological and differential abundance analyses using bioinformatics tools. The AL group had relatively balanced and higher diversity, with Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Veillonella being prominent. In the PJI group, Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas were predominant, especially in deep-tissue samples and biofilm samples, respectively. The differential abundance analysis identified 15 and 2 distinctive taxa in the AL and PJI groups, respectively. Our findings provided preliminary insights supporting the existence of periprosthetic microbiota in orthopedic implants and explaining the differences in microbial composition between the AL and PJI groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
16S rRNA 测序揭示了无菌性松动和人工关节感染病例中骨科植入物微生物群的差异。
人工关节感染(PJI)和无菌性松动(AL)是全关节成形术的常见并发症。越来越多的证据表明,假体植入物上存在微生物群落,但整体微生物情况尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们采用 16S rRNA 测序方法,旨在研究从 PJI 和 AL 患者身上获取的假体植入物微生物组成的差异。研究招募了因 PJI(20 人)或 AL(10 人)而接受翻修髋、膝或肩关节置换术的患者。对翻修手术中从滑膜液、假体周围深层组织和生物膜中采集的微生物标本进行了针对 V3-V4 区域的 16S rRNA 测序。利用生物信息学工具对测序的原始数据进行了微生物组成、生态和差异丰度分析。AL组的多样性相对均衡且较高,其中以葡萄球菌、链球菌和维龙菌为主。在 PJI 组中,葡萄球菌和假单胞菌占主导地位,尤其是在深层组织样本和生物膜样本中。差异丰度分析在 AL 组和 PJI 组分别发现了 15 个和 2 个独特的类群。我们的研究结果提供了初步见解,支持骨科植入物中存在假体周围微生物群,并解释了 AL 组和 PJI 组微生物组成的差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
13.30%
发文量
36
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: AMIH is devoted to the publication of research in all fields of medical microbiology (bacteriology, virology, parasitology, mycology); immunology of infectious diseases and study of the microbiome related to human diseases.
期刊最新文献
In vitro activity of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftolozane-tazobactam, imipenem-relebactam, meropenem-vaborbactam and cefiderocol against carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales from clinical isolates in a tertiary healthcare centre in Serbia. Anaerobic bacteria from bloodstream infections: Identification and antibacterial susceptibility testing in a single center in Türkiye. Antimicrobial resistance pattern of the Bacteroides fragilis group strains isolated at a teaching hospital in China. Identification of NDM-1 producing and colistin resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae ST11: A highly drug-resistant strain detected in intensive care unit of a Greek tertiary care hospital. Aerococcus urinae urinary tract infections: A case series.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1