Online and offline dating violence: same same, but different?

Joana Jaureguizar, Maria Dosil-Santamaria, Iratxe Redondo, Sebastian Wachs, Juan M. Machimbarrena
{"title":"Online and offline dating violence: same same, but different?","authors":"Joana Jaureguizar, Maria Dosil-Santamaria, Iratxe Redondo, Sebastian Wachs, Juan M. Machimbarrena","doi":"10.1186/s41155-024-00293-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Violent behaviors in romantic relationships among adolescents and young people are pressing social matter as they have an effect on both victims and aggressors. Moreover, in the last decades, new forms of harassment, control, and abuse through social networks and mobile phones have arisen. Therefore, now forms of online and offline dating violence coexist. The aim was to analyze the prevalence rates by sex and age and the co-occurrence of online and offline dating violence. Moreover, the roles of online and offline dating violence aggressors and victims for their self-esteem, hostility, general psychological state, and emotional intelligence were investigated. Three hundred forty-one university students from the Basque Country, Spain, participated in the study. They completed six validated instruments related to the mentioned variables. Results highlight the high prevalence of online and offline dating violence in the sample and the co-occurrence of both types. No gender nor sex differences were found for online and offline dating violence perpetration and victimization. The correlation between online and offline dating violence was confirmed, and the reciprocity of violence is greater for offline violence. In relation to the role, both types of victims (online and offline) showed higher levels of hostility and psychological symptomatology than non-victims, but differences in self-esteem and emotional regulation were found in these modalities. Online and offline perpetrators shared hostility and some psychological symptoms as characteristics compared to non-victims, but differed in other symptoms and emotional intelligence. There is a continuum between offline and online victimization perpetration albeit differences in the characteristics such as self-esteem, emotional intelligence, and general functioning exist.","PeriodicalId":501897,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica / Psychology: Research and Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica / Psychology: Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-024-00293-3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Violent behaviors in romantic relationships among adolescents and young people are pressing social matter as they have an effect on both victims and aggressors. Moreover, in the last decades, new forms of harassment, control, and abuse through social networks and mobile phones have arisen. Therefore, now forms of online and offline dating violence coexist. The aim was to analyze the prevalence rates by sex and age and the co-occurrence of online and offline dating violence. Moreover, the roles of online and offline dating violence aggressors and victims for their self-esteem, hostility, general psychological state, and emotional intelligence were investigated. Three hundred forty-one university students from the Basque Country, Spain, participated in the study. They completed six validated instruments related to the mentioned variables. Results highlight the high prevalence of online and offline dating violence in the sample and the co-occurrence of both types. No gender nor sex differences were found for online and offline dating violence perpetration and victimization. The correlation between online and offline dating violence was confirmed, and the reciprocity of violence is greater for offline violence. In relation to the role, both types of victims (online and offline) showed higher levels of hostility and psychological symptomatology than non-victims, but differences in self-esteem and emotional regulation were found in these modalities. Online and offline perpetrators shared hostility and some psychological symptoms as characteristics compared to non-victims, but differed in other symptoms and emotional intelligence. There is a continuum between offline and online victimization perpetration albeit differences in the characteristics such as self-esteem, emotional intelligence, and general functioning exist.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线和离线约会暴力:相同,但不同?
青少年恋爱关系中的暴力行为是一个紧迫的社会问题,因为这些行为对受害者和施暴者都有影响。此外,在过去几十年中,通过社交网络和手机进行骚扰、控制和虐待的新形式层出不穷。因此,现在网上和网下约会暴力并存。我们的目的是分析按性别和年龄划分的流行率,以及线上和线下约会暴力的并存情况。此外,还调查了线上和线下约会暴力施暴者和受害者在自尊、敌意、一般心理状态和情商方面的作用。来自西班牙巴斯克地区的 341 名大学生参与了这项研究。他们完成了与上述变量相关的六种经过验证的工具。研究结果表明,在线和离线约会暴力在样本中的发生率很高,而且两种类型的暴力同时存在。在线和离线约会暴力的实施和受害情况没有性别差异。线上和线下约会暴力之间的相关性得到了证实,线下暴力的互惠性更强。在角色方面,两类受害者(线上和线下)都比非受害者表现出更高程度的敌意和心理症状,但在自尊和情绪调节方面发现了这些模式的差异。与非受害者相比,在线和离线施暴者具有共同的敌意和某些心理症状,但在其他症状和情商方面存在差异。尽管自尊、情商和一般功能等特征存在差异,但线下和线上受害行为之间存在连续性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addiction to ultra-processed foods as a mediator between psychological stress and emotional eating during the COVID-19 pandemic Role of self-criticism in postpartum mental health: a network analysis Assessing non-dysfunctional attitudes toward sleep: psychometric properties of the Charlotte Attitudes Toward Sleep scale in Portuguese samples Internet addiction, sleeping habits and psychological distress in Brazilian adolescents and young adults A mixed methods study of suicide protective factors in college students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1