A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Dose Prediction Models for Cervical Cancer Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment Pub Date : 2024-04-08 DOI:10.1177/15330338241242654
Zhe Wu, Mujun Liu, Ya Pang, Lihua Deng, Yi Yang, Yi Wu
{"title":"A Comparative Study of Deep Learning Dose Prediction Models for Cervical Cancer Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy","authors":"Zhe Wu, Mujun Liu, Ya Pang, Lihua Deng, Yi Yang, Yi Wu","doi":"10.1177/15330338241242654","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Deep learning (DL) is widely used in dose prediction for radiation oncology, multiple DL techniques comparison is often lacking in the literature. To compare the performance of 4 state-of-the-art DL models in predicting the voxel-level dose distribution for cervical cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods and Materials: A total of 261 patients’ plans for cervical cancer were retrieved in this retrospective study. A three-channel feature map, consisting of a planning target volume (PTV) mask, organs at risk (OARs) mask, and CT image was fed into the three-dimensional (3D) U-Net and its 3 variants models. The data set was randomly divided into 80% as training-validation and 20% as testing set, respectively. The model performance was evaluated on the 52 testing patients by comparing the generated dose distributions against the clinical approved ground truth (GT) using mean absolute error (MAE), dose map difference (GT-predicted), clinical dosimetric indices, and dice similarity coefficients (DSC). Results: The 3D U-Net and its 3 variants DL models exhibited promising performance with a maximum MAE within the PTV 0.83% ± 0.67% in the UNETR model. The maximum MAE among the OARs is the left femoral head, which reached 6.95% ± 6.55%. For the body, the maximum MAE was observed in UNETR, which is 1.19 ± 0.86%, and the minimum MAE was 0.94 ± 0.85% for 3D U-Net. The average error of the Dmean difference for different OARs is within 2.5 Gy. The average error of V40 difference for the bladder and rectum is about 5%. The mean DSC under different isodose volumes was above 90%. Conclusions: DL models can predict the voxel-level dose distribution accurately for cervical cancer VMAT treatment plans. All models demonstrated almost analogous performance for voxel-wise dose prediction maps. Considering all voxels within the body, 3D U-Net showed the best performance. The state-of-the-art DL models are of great significance for further clinical applications of cervical cancer VMAT.","PeriodicalId":22203,"journal":{"name":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","volume":"47 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338241242654","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Deep learning (DL) is widely used in dose prediction for radiation oncology, multiple DL techniques comparison is often lacking in the literature. To compare the performance of 4 state-of-the-art DL models in predicting the voxel-level dose distribution for cervical cancer volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Methods and Materials: A total of 261 patients’ plans for cervical cancer were retrieved in this retrospective study. A three-channel feature map, consisting of a planning target volume (PTV) mask, organs at risk (OARs) mask, and CT image was fed into the three-dimensional (3D) U-Net and its 3 variants models. The data set was randomly divided into 80% as training-validation and 20% as testing set, respectively. The model performance was evaluated on the 52 testing patients by comparing the generated dose distributions against the clinical approved ground truth (GT) using mean absolute error (MAE), dose map difference (GT-predicted), clinical dosimetric indices, and dice similarity coefficients (DSC). Results: The 3D U-Net and its 3 variants DL models exhibited promising performance with a maximum MAE within the PTV 0.83% ± 0.67% in the UNETR model. The maximum MAE among the OARs is the left femoral head, which reached 6.95% ± 6.55%. For the body, the maximum MAE was observed in UNETR, which is 1.19 ± 0.86%, and the minimum MAE was 0.94 ± 0.85% for 3D U-Net. The average error of the Dmean difference for different OARs is within 2.5 Gy. The average error of V40 difference for the bladder and rectum is about 5%. The mean DSC under different isodose volumes was above 90%. Conclusions: DL models can predict the voxel-level dose distribution accurately for cervical cancer VMAT treatment plans. All models demonstrated almost analogous performance for voxel-wise dose prediction maps. Considering all voxels within the body, 3D U-Net showed the best performance. The state-of-the-art DL models are of great significance for further clinical applications of cervical cancer VMAT.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宫颈癌容积调制弧治疗的深度学习剂量预测模型比较研究
目的:深度学习(DL)被广泛应用于放射肿瘤学的剂量预测,但文献中往往缺乏多种深度学习技术的比较。目的:比较 4 种最先进的深度学习模型在预测宫颈癌容积调制弧治疗(VMAT)的体素级剂量分布方面的性能。方法和材料:这项回顾性研究共检索了 261 例宫颈癌患者的计划。由计划靶体积(PTV)掩膜、危险器官(OARs)掩膜和 CT 图像组成的三通道特征图被输入到三维(3D)U-Net 及其 3 个变体模型中。数据集被随机分为 80% 作为训练验证集,20% 作为测试集。通过使用平均绝对误差(MAE)、剂量图差异(GT-预测)、临床剂量学指数和骰子相似系数(DSC),将生成的剂量分布与临床批准的地面实况(GT)进行比较,对 52 名测试患者的模型性能进行评估。结果:3D U-Net 及其 3 个变体 DL 模型表现出良好的性能,UNETR 模型在 PTV 内的最大 MAE 为 0.83% ± 0.67%。在 OAR 中,左股骨头的 MAE 最大,达到 6.95% ± 6.55%。在身体方面,UNETR 的 MAE 最大,为 1.19 ± 0.86%,而 3D U-Net 的 MAE 最小,为 0.94 ± 0.85%。不同 OAR 的 Dmean 差值平均误差在 2.5 Gy 以内。膀胱和直肠的 V40 差值平均误差约为 5%。不同等剂量体积下的平均 DSC 均高于 90%。结论DL 模型可以准确预测宫颈癌 VMAT 治疗计划的体素级剂量分布。所有模型在体素剂量预测图方面的表现几乎相似。考虑到体内的所有体素,3D U-Net 显示出最佳性能。最先进的 DL 模型对宫颈癌 VMAT 的进一步临床应用具有重要意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment (TCRT) is a JCR-ranked, broad-spectrum, open access, peer-reviewed publication whose aim is to provide researchers and clinicians with a platform to share and discuss developments in the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and monitoring of cancer.
期刊最新文献
A 3 M Evaluation Protocol for Examining Lymph Nodes in Cancer Patients: Multi-Modal, Multi-Omics, Multi-Stage Approach Prognostic Value of IGFBP6 in Breast Cancer: Focus on Glucometabolism The Antimicrobial Peptide Merecidin Inhibit the Metastasis of Triple-Negative Breast Cancer by Obstructing EMT via miR-30d-5p/Vimentin Predictive Value of Peripheral Blood Eosinophil Count on the Efficacy of Treatment with Camrelizumab in Combination with Lenvatinib in Patients with Advanced Hepatitis B-Associated Hepatocellular Carcinoma Retracted: “CRISPR/Cas9: A Revolutionary Genome Editing Tool for Human Cancers Treatment”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1