Reading processes of public and private middle school and high school students

Adriana Marques de Oliveira, Jair Lício Ferreira Santos, Simone Aparecida Capellini
{"title":"Reading processes of public and private middle school and high school students","authors":"Adriana Marques de Oliveira, Jair Lício Ferreira Santos, Simone Aparecida Capellini","doi":"10.1186/s41155-024-00296-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reading has been widely discussed, mainly due to the published results of international performance tests of schoolchildren. The gaps generated in literacy hinder the development of basic skills necessary for reading, which will have a negative impact on the teaching-learning process from elementary school to high school. This study aimed to compare the reading performance of the students in public and private schools through tests of the Brazilian reading processes-PROLEC-SE-R. Cross-sectional study. The Brazilian adaptation of the PROLEC-SE-R was administered to 436 students: 221 from the state school (G1 6th year, n = 30; G2 7th year, n = 33; G3 8th year, n = 35; G4 9th year, n = 31; G5 1st year, n = 32; G6 2nd year, n = 30; G7 3rd year, n = 30) e 215 private schools (G8 6th year, n = 31; G9 7th year, n = 31; G10 8th year, n = 30; G11 9th year, n = 31; G12 1st year, n = 30; G13 2nd year, n = 31; G14 3rd year, n = 31). Tools of descriptive and bivariate analysis were used. Superior performance of the private school students on spelling tests helps their reading as evidenced by their scores for syntactic and semantic processes. When the knowledge of the use of the word in text, extraction of meaning and its understanding was needed, the difficulty of access to the mental lexicon of the studied population became evident. The PROLEC-SE-R, in addition to establishing the reading profile of elementary and high school students, shows that the gaps in teaching and learning, which exist between public and private education in the literacy period, accompany students throughout the basic education cycle. Knowing the reading profile and in which process there is a disruption is important so that the teaching of specific strategies can be promoted throughout the entire schooling process, especially in primary and secondary education.","PeriodicalId":501897,"journal":{"name":"Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica / Psychology: Research and Review","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica / Psychology: Research and Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-024-00296-0","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reading has been widely discussed, mainly due to the published results of international performance tests of schoolchildren. The gaps generated in literacy hinder the development of basic skills necessary for reading, which will have a negative impact on the teaching-learning process from elementary school to high school. This study aimed to compare the reading performance of the students in public and private schools through tests of the Brazilian reading processes-PROLEC-SE-R. Cross-sectional study. The Brazilian adaptation of the PROLEC-SE-R was administered to 436 students: 221 from the state school (G1 6th year, n = 30; G2 7th year, n = 33; G3 8th year, n = 35; G4 9th year, n = 31; G5 1st year, n = 32; G6 2nd year, n = 30; G7 3rd year, n = 30) e 215 private schools (G8 6th year, n = 31; G9 7th year, n = 31; G10 8th year, n = 30; G11 9th year, n = 31; G12 1st year, n = 30; G13 2nd year, n = 31; G14 3rd year, n = 31). Tools of descriptive and bivariate analysis were used. Superior performance of the private school students on spelling tests helps their reading as evidenced by their scores for syntactic and semantic processes. When the knowledge of the use of the word in text, extraction of meaning and its understanding was needed, the difficulty of access to the mental lexicon of the studied population became evident. The PROLEC-SE-R, in addition to establishing the reading profile of elementary and high school students, shows that the gaps in teaching and learning, which exist between public and private education in the literacy period, accompany students throughout the basic education cycle. Knowing the reading profile and in which process there is a disruption is important so that the teaching of specific strategies can be promoted throughout the entire schooling process, especially in primary and secondary education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公立和私立初中和高中学生的阅读过程
阅读问题已被广泛讨论,这主要是由于国际上公布的学童成绩测试结果。在识字方面产生的差距阻碍了阅读所需的基本技能的发展,这将对从小学到高中的教学过程产生负面影响。本研究旨在通过巴西阅读过程测试--PROLEC-SE-R,比较公立学校和私立学校学生的阅读成绩。横向研究。对 436 名学生进行了巴西版 PROLEC-SE-R 测试:221 名来自公立学校(G1 六年级,n = 30;G2 七年级,n = 33;G3 八年级,n = 35;G4 九年级,n = 31;G5 一年级,n = 32;G6 二年级,n = 30;e 215 所私立学校(G8 6 年级,n = 31;G9 7 年级,n = 31;G10 8 年级,n = 30;G11 9 年级,n = 31;G12 1 年级,n = 30;G13 2 年级,n = 31;G14 3 年级,n = 31)。使用了描述性和双变量分析工具。私立学校学生在拼写测试中的优异成绩有助于他们的阅读,这一点可以从他们的句法和语义过程得分中得到证明。当需要了解单词在文本中的用法、意义提取及其理解时,研究对象在获取心理词典方面的困难就显而易见了。PROLEC-SE-R 除了确定小学和高中学生的阅读概况外,还表明公立和私立教育在扫盲阶段存在的教与学的差距,伴随着学生的整个基础教育周期。了解学生的阅读情况以及在哪个过程中出现了偏差非常重要,这样就可以在整个学校教育过程中,特别是在中小学教育中,推广具体的教学策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Addiction to ultra-processed foods as a mediator between psychological stress and emotional eating during the COVID-19 pandemic Role of self-criticism in postpartum mental health: a network analysis Assessing non-dysfunctional attitudes toward sleep: psychometric properties of the Charlotte Attitudes Toward Sleep scale in Portuguese samples Internet addiction, sleeping habits and psychological distress in Brazilian adolescents and young adults A mixed methods study of suicide protective factors in college students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1