Subsidized wages, small businesses, and exports: Evidence from the paycheck protection program

IF 1 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Review of International Economics Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1111/roie.12748
Ali Enami, Sucharita Ghosh
{"title":"Subsidized wages, small businesses, and exports: Evidence from the paycheck protection program","authors":"Ali Enami, Sucharita Ghosh","doi":"10.1111/roie.12748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The easily forgivable federal loans offered through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) to offset the impact of the COVID‐19 recession provide a unique opportunity to investigate whether subsidizing the costs of labor for small firms can increase exports in the whole industry. The main eligibility rule to receive these loans, i.e., having less than 500 employees in 2019 and the size of loans, were dependent on the size of the firm prior to the COVID‐19 pandemic. This implies a plausibly exogenous variation in the size of the PPP loans across states and industries. We exploit this exogenous variation in the size of PPP loans and estimate a difference‐in‐differences model that allows for heterogenous treatment effect to measure the instantaneous and dynamic effects of these loans. We find that a 10% increase in the size of PPP loans in 2020 and 2021 leads to 0.27% and 0.37% increase in exports in a given state‐industry. The 2020 loans appear to have no lasting effect beyond the quarter they are awarded. The 2021 loans, however, displayed a more dynamic effect and a 10% increase in the size of these loans in one quarter would lead to 0.28% increase in the value of exports three quarters later. In addition to estimating the average effect of these loans, we show that the effects of the loans are significantly heterogeneous across industries and the per‐dollar effect of these loans decreases as the loan size (per employee) increases.","PeriodicalId":47712,"journal":{"name":"Review of International Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Review of International Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/roie.12748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The easily forgivable federal loans offered through the Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) to offset the impact of the COVID‐19 recession provide a unique opportunity to investigate whether subsidizing the costs of labor for small firms can increase exports in the whole industry. The main eligibility rule to receive these loans, i.e., having less than 500 employees in 2019 and the size of loans, were dependent on the size of the firm prior to the COVID‐19 pandemic. This implies a plausibly exogenous variation in the size of the PPP loans across states and industries. We exploit this exogenous variation in the size of PPP loans and estimate a difference‐in‐differences model that allows for heterogenous treatment effect to measure the instantaneous and dynamic effects of these loans. We find that a 10% increase in the size of PPP loans in 2020 and 2021 leads to 0.27% and 0.37% increase in exports in a given state‐industry. The 2020 loans appear to have no lasting effect beyond the quarter they are awarded. The 2021 loans, however, displayed a more dynamic effect and a 10% increase in the size of these loans in one quarter would lead to 0.28% increase in the value of exports three quarters later. In addition to estimating the average effect of these loans, we show that the effects of the loans are significantly heterogeneous across industries and the per‐dollar effect of these loans decreases as the loan size (per employee) increases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
补贴工资、小企业和出口:来自工资保护计划的证据
为抵消 COVID-19 经济衰退的影响,通过 "工资保护计划"(PPP)提供了可轻松免除的联邦贷款,这为研究补贴小企业劳动力成本是否能增加整个行业的出口提供了一个独特的机会。获得这些贷款的主要资格规则,即 2019 年员工人数少于 500 人和贷款规模,取决于 COVID-19 大流行之前的企业规模。这意味着各州和各行业的购买力平价贷款规模可能存在外生差异。我们利用 PPP 贷款规模的这种外生性差异,估计了一个允许异质性处理效应的差分模型,以衡量这些贷款的即时和动态效应。我们发现,2020 年和 2021 年购买力平价贷款规模每增加 10%,就会导致特定国家-行业的出口分别增加 0.27% 和 0.37%。2020 年的贷款在发放季度之后似乎没有持续影响。而 2021 年的贷款则显示出更大的动态效应,贷款规模在一个季度内增加 10%,将导致三个季度后出口额增加 0.28%。除了估算这些贷款的平均效应外,我们还表明,这些贷款的效应在不同行业之间具有显著的异质性,而且这些贷款的每美元效应会随着贷款规模(每名雇员)的增加而降低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: The Review of International Economics is devoted to the publication of high-quality articles on a full range of topics in international economics. The Review comprises controversial and innovative thought and detailed contributions from other directly related fields such as economic development; trade and the environment; and political economy. Whether theoretical, empirical or policy-oriented, its relevance to real world problems is of paramount concern.
期刊最新文献
Determinants and international transmission of interest rates: Do foreign reserves and sovereign debt matter? A footloose capital model of economic development Optimal management of international reserves International attractiveness of cities: The drivers of urban FDI Firm‐level prices, quality, and markups: The role of immigrant workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1