Impact of Local Tailoring on Acute Stroke Care in 21 Disparate Emergency Departments: A Prospective Stepped Wedge Type III Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study

Kathleen E. McKee, Andrew J. Knighton, Kristy Veale, Julie Martinez, Cory McCann, Jonathan W. Anderson, Doug Wolfe, Robert Blackburn, Marilyn McKasson, Tyler Bardsley, Blessing Ofori-Atta, Tom H. Greene, Robert Hoesch, H. Adrian Püttgen, Rajendu Srivastava
{"title":"Impact of Local Tailoring on Acute Stroke Care in 21 Disparate Emergency Departments: A Prospective Stepped Wedge Type III Hybrid Effectiveness-Implementation Study","authors":"Kathleen E. McKee, Andrew J. Knighton, Kristy Veale, Julie Martinez, Cory McCann, Jonathan W. Anderson, Doug Wolfe, Robert Blackburn, Marilyn McKasson, Tyler Bardsley, Blessing Ofori-Atta, Tom H. Greene, Robert Hoesch, H. Adrian Püttgen, Rajendu Srivastava","doi":"10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND:Faster delivery of tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) results in better health outcomes for eligible patients with stroke. Standardization of stroke protocols in emergency departments (EDs) has been difficult, especially in nonstroke centers. We measured the effectiveness of a centrally led implementation strategy with local site tailoring to sustain adherence to an acute stroke protocol to improve door-to-needle (DTN) times across disparate EDs in a multihospital health system.METHODS:Prospective, type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation cohort study measuring performance at 21 EDs in Utah and Idaho (stroke centers [4]/nonstroke centers [17]) from January 2018 to February 2020 using a nonrandomized stepped-wedge design, monthly repeated site measures and multilevel hierarchical modeling. Each site received the implementation strategies in 1 of 6 steps providing control and intervention data. Co-primary outcomes were percentage of DTN times ≤60 minutes and median DTN time. Secondary outcomes included percentage of door-to-activation of neurological consult times ≤10 minutes and clinical effectiveness outcomes. Results were stratified between stroke and nonstroke centers.RESULTS:A total of 855 474 ED patient encounters occurred with 5325 code stroke activations (median age, 69 [IQR, 56–79] years; 51.8% female patients]. Percentage of door-to-activation times ≤10 minutes increased from 47.5% to 59.9% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.40–2.67]). A total of 615 patients received tPA of ≤3 hours from symptom onset (median age, 71 [IQR, 58–80] years; 49.6% female patients). The percentage of DTN times ≤60 minutes increased from 72.5% to 86.1% (adjusted odds ratio, 3.38, [95% CI, 1.47–7.78]; stroke centers (77.4%–90.0%); nonstroke centers [59.3%–72.1%]). Median DTN time declined from 46 to 38 minutes (adjusted median difference, −9.68 [95% CI, −17.17 to −2.20]; stroke centers [41–35 minutes]; nonstroke centers [55–52 minutes]). No differences were observed in clinical effectiveness outcomes.CONCLUSIONS:A centrally led implementation strategy with local site tailoring led to faster delivery of tPA across disparate EDs in a multihospital system with no change in clinical effectiveness outcomes including rates of complication. Disparities in performance persisted between stroke and nonstroke centers.","PeriodicalId":10239,"journal":{"name":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Circulation: Cardiovascular Quality and Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1161/circoutcomes.123.010477","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND:Faster delivery of tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) results in better health outcomes for eligible patients with stroke. Standardization of stroke protocols in emergency departments (EDs) has been difficult, especially in nonstroke centers. We measured the effectiveness of a centrally led implementation strategy with local site tailoring to sustain adherence to an acute stroke protocol to improve door-to-needle (DTN) times across disparate EDs in a multihospital health system.METHODS:Prospective, type III hybrid effectiveness-implementation cohort study measuring performance at 21 EDs in Utah and Idaho (stroke centers [4]/nonstroke centers [17]) from January 2018 to February 2020 using a nonrandomized stepped-wedge design, monthly repeated site measures and multilevel hierarchical modeling. Each site received the implementation strategies in 1 of 6 steps providing control and intervention data. Co-primary outcomes were percentage of DTN times ≤60 minutes and median DTN time. Secondary outcomes included percentage of door-to-activation of neurological consult times ≤10 minutes and clinical effectiveness outcomes. Results were stratified between stroke and nonstroke centers.RESULTS:A total of 855 474 ED patient encounters occurred with 5325 code stroke activations (median age, 69 [IQR, 56–79] years; 51.8% female patients]. Percentage of door-to-activation times ≤10 minutes increased from 47.5% to 59.9% (adjusted odds ratio, 1.93 [95% CI, 1.40–2.67]). A total of 615 patients received tPA of ≤3 hours from symptom onset (median age, 71 [IQR, 58–80] years; 49.6% female patients). The percentage of DTN times ≤60 minutes increased from 72.5% to 86.1% (adjusted odds ratio, 3.38, [95% CI, 1.47–7.78]; stroke centers (77.4%–90.0%); nonstroke centers [59.3%–72.1%]). Median DTN time declined from 46 to 38 minutes (adjusted median difference, −9.68 [95% CI, −17.17 to −2.20]; stroke centers [41–35 minutes]; nonstroke centers [55–52 minutes]). No differences were observed in clinical effectiveness outcomes.CONCLUSIONS:A centrally led implementation strategy with local site tailoring led to faster delivery of tPA across disparate EDs in a multihospital system with no change in clinical effectiveness outcomes including rates of complication. Disparities in performance persisted between stroke and nonstroke centers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在 21 个不同急诊科进行局部调整对急性卒中护理的影响:前瞻性阶梯式楔形III型混合疗效实施研究
背景:对符合条件的脑卒中患者而言,更快地提供 tPA(组织型纤溶酶原激活剂)可带来更好的医疗效果。急诊科(ED)卒中规范的标准化一直很困难,尤其是在非卒中中心。我们测量了在多医院医疗系统中,由中央领导的实施策略与地方医疗机构量身定制的急性卒中治疗方案的有效性,以改善不同急诊室的门到针(DTN)时间。方法:采用非随机阶梯式楔形设计、每月重复现场测量和多级分层建模,对犹他州和爱达荷州 21 家急诊室(卒中中心 [4] / 非卒中中心 [17])2018 年 1 月至 2020 年 2 月的绩效进行前瞻性、III 型混合有效性实施队列研究。每个医疗点在 6 个步骤中的 1 个步骤中接受实施策略,提供对照和干预数据。共同主要结果是 DTN 时间≤60 分钟的百分比和 DTN 时间中位数。次要结果包括从门诊到启动神经科会诊时间≤10 分钟的百分比和临床效果结果。结果:共有 855 474 例急诊患者就诊,其中 5325 例为卒中激活(中位年龄 69 [IQR,56-79]岁;51.8% 为女性患者)。门到启动时间≤10 分钟的比例从 47.5% 增加到 59.9%(调整后的几率比为 1.93 [95% CI,1.40-2.67])。共有 615 名患者在症状出现后 3 小时内接受了 tPA(中位年龄为 71 [IQR,58-80]岁;49.6% 为女性患者)。DTN时间≤60分钟的比例从72.5%增至86.1%(调整后的几率比为3.38,[95% CI,1.47-7.78];卒中中心(77.4%-90.0%);非卒中中心[59.3%-72.1%])。中位 DTN 时间从 46 分钟降至 38 分钟(调整后的中位差异为 -9.68 [95% CI, -17.17 to -2.20];卒中中心 [41-35 分钟];非卒中中心 [55-52 分钟])。结论:在多医院系统中,由中央领导的实施策略与地方医疗机构的量身定制使不同急诊室的 tPA 送达速度更快,但临床效果(包括并发症发生率)没有变化。卒中中心和非卒中中心之间的绩效差距依然存在。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Future of Patient-Reported Outcomes: Bringing Patients' Voices Into Health Care. Do Current Clinical Guidelines Set Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Up to Fail? Insights From the ORBITA-2 Trial. ORBITA Trials Are Not Justification to Promote a PCI-First Strategy in Nonacute Myocardial Ischemic Syndromes. Arguing Angina: ORBITA's Challenge to Conventional Wisdom on PCI. Unequal Management and Outcomes Among Asian American Patients With Coronary Heart Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1