Optimization of the square and squared-off cascades to separate stable isotopes using meta-heuristic algorithms

IF 0.4 4区 工程技术 Q4 NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Atomic Energy Pub Date : 2024-04-09 DOI:10.1007/s10512-024-01072-0
Fatemeh Ardestani, Jaber Safdari, Mohammad Hassan Mallah, Morteza Imani
{"title":"Optimization of the square and squared-off cascades to separate stable isotopes using meta-heuristic algorithms","authors":"Fatemeh Ardestani, Jaber Safdari, Mohammad Hassan Mallah, Morteza Imani","doi":"10.1007/s10512-024-01072-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In this paper, the optimization of the square and squared-off cascades for the separation of stable isotopes with a certain number of gas centrifuges (GCs) using particle swarm optimization (PSO) and the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) was studied. For this purpose, the “SC-PSO” and “SC-WOA” codes for the square cascade (SC), and the “SOC-PSO” and “SOC-WOA” codes for the squared-off cascade (SOC) were developed. The performance of the PSO and WOA algorithms in the optimization of the square and squared-off cascades as an example for the separation of <sup>124</sup>Xe from nine stable isotopes of xenon up to an enrichment of 85% was compared. The recovery coefficient of <sup>124</sup>Xe isotope by the codes “SC-PSO”, “SC-WOA”, “SOC-PSO”, and “SOC-WOA” was obtained 86.14, 78.11, 92.84, and 83.41% respectively. The performance of the algorithms indicates the higher yield of the PSO algorithm in the optimization of SC and SOC. The efficiency of the PSO has been demonstrated by the Griewank test function compared with the WOA, the sine cosine algorithm (SCA), and the dragon-fly algorithm (DA) (PSO&gt;WOA&gt;SCA&gt;DA). Furthermore, the results show that SOC performs better than SC.</p>","PeriodicalId":480,"journal":{"name":"Atomic Energy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atomic Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10512-024-01072-0","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NUCLEAR SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, the optimization of the square and squared-off cascades for the separation of stable isotopes with a certain number of gas centrifuges (GCs) using particle swarm optimization (PSO) and the whale optimization algorithm (WOA) was studied. For this purpose, the “SC-PSO” and “SC-WOA” codes for the square cascade (SC), and the “SOC-PSO” and “SOC-WOA” codes for the squared-off cascade (SOC) were developed. The performance of the PSO and WOA algorithms in the optimization of the square and squared-off cascades as an example for the separation of 124Xe from nine stable isotopes of xenon up to an enrichment of 85% was compared. The recovery coefficient of 124Xe isotope by the codes “SC-PSO”, “SC-WOA”, “SOC-PSO”, and “SOC-WOA” was obtained 86.14, 78.11, 92.84, and 83.41% respectively. The performance of the algorithms indicates the higher yield of the PSO algorithm in the optimization of SC and SOC. The efficiency of the PSO has been demonstrated by the Griewank test function compared with the WOA, the sine cosine algorithm (SCA), and the dragon-fly algorithm (DA) (PSO>WOA>SCA>DA). Furthermore, the results show that SOC performs better than SC.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用元启发式算法优化用于分离稳定同位素的方形级联和方形级联
本文研究了利用粒子群优化(PSO)和鲸鱼优化算法(WOA)优化方形级联和方形级联,以便用一定数量的气体离心机(GC)分离稳定同位素。为此,开发了方形级联(SC)的 "SC-PSO "和 "SC-WOA "代码,以及方形级联(SOC)的 "SOC-PSO "和 "SOC-WOA "代码。以从九种稳定的氙同位素中分离 124Xe (富集度高达 85%)为例,比较了 PSO 算法和 WOA 算法在优化方形级联和方形级联中的性能。通过 "SC-PSO"、"SC-WOA"、"SOC-PSO "和 "SOC-WOA "代码得到的 124Xe 同位素回收系数分别为 86.14%、78.11%、92.84%和 83.41%。这些算法的性能表明,PSO 算法在 SC 和 SOC 的优化中收益更高。通过 Griewank 测试函数与 WOA、正弦余弦算法(SCA)和蜻蜓算法(DA)(PSO>WOA>SCA>DA)进行比较,证明了 PSO 的效率。此外,结果表明 SOC 的性能优于 SC。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Atomic Energy
Atomic Energy 工程技术-核科学技术
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
100
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Atomic Energy publishes papers and review articles dealing with the latest developments in the peaceful uses of atomic energy. Topics include nuclear chemistry and physics, plasma physics, accelerator characteristics, reactor economics and engineering, applications of isotopes, and radiation monitoring and safety.
期刊最新文献
Prospects for fusion neutron sources in the Russian nuclear power industry Use of a refueling machine mast sipping system to detect leaking FAs during operational fuel cladding failure detection Approaches to slowing down the kinetics of a fast reactor as a means of enhancing its self-protection properties Study into the possibility of using two groups of accelerated preventive protection for VVER-1200 reactors Accounting for the reference data correlation when determining the calculation error using the maximum likelihood method
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1