Global prevalence of onychomycosis in general and special populations: An updated perspective

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY Mycoses Pub Date : 2024-04-12 DOI:10.1111/myc.13725
Aditya K. Gupta, Tong Wang, Shruthi Polla Ravi, Avantika Mann, Mary A. Bamimore
{"title":"Global prevalence of onychomycosis in general and special populations: An updated perspective","authors":"Aditya K. Gupta, Tong Wang, Shruthi Polla Ravi, Avantika Mann, Mary A. Bamimore","doi":"10.1111/myc.13725","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundOnychomycosis is a chronic nail disorder commonly seen by healthcare providers; toenail involvement in particular presents a treatment challenge.ObjectiveTo provide an updated estimate on the prevalence of toenail onychomycosis.MethodsWe conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Studies reporting mycology‐confirmed diagnoses were included and stratified into (a) <jats:italic>populations‐based</jats:italic> studies, and studies that included (b) <jats:italic>clinically un‐suspected</jats:italic> and (c) <jats:italic>clinically suspected</jats:italic> patients.ResultsA total of 108 studies were included. Based on studies that examined <jats:italic>clinically un‐suspected</jats:italic> patients (i.e., with or without clinical features suggestive of onychomycosis), the pooled prevalence rate of toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes was 4% (95% CI: 3–5) among the general population; special populations with a heightened risk include knee osteoarthritis patients (RR: 14.6 [95% CI: 13.0–16.5]), chronic venous disease patients (RR: 5.6 [95% CI: 3.7–8.1]), renal transplant patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 3.3–6.5]), geriatric patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.4–4.9]), HIV‐positive patients (RR: 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9–4.7]), lupus erythematosus patients (RR: 3.1 [95% CI: 1.2–6.3]), diabetic patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 2.4–3.3]) and hemodialysis patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 1.9–4.0]). The prevalence of onychomycosis in <jats:italic>clinically suspected</jats:italic> patients was significantly higher likely due to sampling bias. A high degree of variability was found in a limited number of <jats:italic>population‐based</jats:italic> studies indicating that certain pockets of the population may be more predisposed to onychomycosis. The diagnosis of non‐dermatophyte mould onychomycosis requires repeat sampling to rule out contaminants or commensal organisms; a significant difference was found between studies that performed single sampling versus repeat sampling. The advent of PCR diagnosis results in improved detection rates for dermatophytes compared to culture.ConclusionOnychomycosis is an underrecognized healthcare burden. Further <jats:italic>population‐based</jats:italic> studies using standardized PCR methods are warranted.","PeriodicalId":18797,"journal":{"name":"Mycoses","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mycoses","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/myc.13725","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundOnychomycosis is a chronic nail disorder commonly seen by healthcare providers; toenail involvement in particular presents a treatment challenge.ObjectiveTo provide an updated estimate on the prevalence of toenail onychomycosis.MethodsWe conducted a literature search using PubMed, Embase and Web of Science. Studies reporting mycology‐confirmed diagnoses were included and stratified into (a) populations‐based studies, and studies that included (b) clinically un‐suspected and (c) clinically suspected patients.ResultsA total of 108 studies were included. Based on studies that examined clinically un‐suspected patients (i.e., with or without clinical features suggestive of onychomycosis), the pooled prevalence rate of toenail onychomycosis caused by dermatophytes was 4% (95% CI: 3–5) among the general population; special populations with a heightened risk include knee osteoarthritis patients (RR: 14.6 [95% CI: 13.0–16.5]), chronic venous disease patients (RR: 5.6 [95% CI: 3.7–8.1]), renal transplant patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 3.3–6.5]), geriatric patients (RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.4–4.9]), HIV‐positive patients (RR: 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9–4.7]), lupus erythematosus patients (RR: 3.1 [95% CI: 1.2–6.3]), diabetic patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 2.4–3.3]) and hemodialysis patients (RR: 2.8 [95% CI: 1.9–4.0]). The prevalence of onychomycosis in clinically suspected patients was significantly higher likely due to sampling bias. A high degree of variability was found in a limited number of population‐based studies indicating that certain pockets of the population may be more predisposed to onychomycosis. The diagnosis of non‐dermatophyte mould onychomycosis requires repeat sampling to rule out contaminants or commensal organisms; a significant difference was found between studies that performed single sampling versus repeat sampling. The advent of PCR diagnosis results in improved detection rates for dermatophytes compared to culture.ConclusionOnychomycosis is an underrecognized healthcare burden. Further population‐based studies using standardized PCR methods are warranted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
甲癣在普通人群和特殊人群中的全球流行率:最新观点
背景甲癣是医护人员常见的一种慢性甲病,尤其是趾甲受累给治疗带来了挑战。方法我们使用 PubMed、Embase 和 Web of Science 进行了文献检索。结果共纳入 108 项研究。根据对临床非疑似患者(即由皮真菌引起的趾甲真菌病在普通人群中的总患病率为 4% (95% CI: 3-5);风险较高的特殊人群包括膝关节骨关节炎患者(RR: 14.6 [95% CI: 13.0-16.5])、慢性静脉疾病患者(RR: 5.6 [95% CI: 3.7-8.1])、肾移植患者(RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 3.3-6.5])、老年患者(RR: 4.7 [95% CI: 4.4-4.9])、HIV 阳性患者(RR: 3.7 [95% CI: 2.9-4.7])、红斑狼疮患者(RR:3.1 [95% CI:1.2-6.3])、糖尿病患者(RR:2.8 [95% CI:2.4-3.3])和血液透析患者(RR:2.8 [95% CI:1.9-4.0])。临床疑似患者的甲癣患病率明显较高,这可能是由于抽样偏差造成的。在数量有限的人群研究中发现了高度的变异性,这表明某些人群可能更容易患上甲癣。非皮癣霉菌性甲癣的诊断需要重复采样,以排除污染物或共生菌;在进行单次采样和重复采样的研究中发现了显著差异。与培养相比,PCR 诊断技术的出现提高了皮癣菌的检出率。有必要使用标准化的 PCR 方法进一步开展基于人群的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Mycoses
Mycoses 医学-皮肤病学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
8.20%
发文量
143
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Mycoses provides an international forum for original papers in English on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, therapy, prophylaxis, and epidemiology of fungal infectious diseases in humans as well as on the biology of pathogenic fungi. Medical mycology as part of medical microbiology is advancing rapidly. Effective therapeutic strategies are already available in chemotherapy and are being further developed. Their application requires reliable laboratory diagnostic techniques, which, in turn, result from mycological basic research. Opportunistic mycoses vary greatly in their clinical and pathological symptoms, because the underlying disease of a patient at risk decisively determines their symptomatology and progress. The journal Mycoses is therefore of interest to scientists in fundamental mycological research, mycological laboratory diagnosticians and clinicians interested in fungal infections.
期刊最新文献
High-Resolution Melting Assay to Detect the Mutations That Cause the Y132F and G458S Substitutions at the ERG11 Gene Involved in Azole Resistance in Candida parapsilosis. First Reported Cases of Terbinafine-Resistant Trichophyton indotineae Isolates in Israel: Epidemiology, Clinical Characteristics and Response to Treatment. Multicentre Study of Candida parapsilosis Blood Isolates in Türkiye Highlights an Increasing Rate of Fluconazole Resistance and Emergence of Echinocandin and Multidrug Resistance. The In Vitro Activity of Rezafungin Against Uncommon Species of Candida. Detecting Echinocandin Resistance in C. glabrata Using Commercial Methods: Are CLSI or EUCAST Breakpoints Suitable for Categorical Classification?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1