Changes in intraocular pressure following intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients with history of glaucoma filtration surgery

Dong Kyu Lee, Joo Yong Lee, Se Joon Woo, Yong Sok Ji, Christopher Seungkyu Lee
{"title":"Changes in intraocular pressure following intravitreal dexamethasone implant in patients with history of glaucoma filtration surgery","authors":"Dong Kyu Lee, Joo Yong Lee, Se Joon Woo, Yong Sok Ji, Christopher Seungkyu Lee","doi":"10.1007/s00417-024-06468-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Purpose</h3><p>This study aimed to evaluate changes in intraocular pressure following intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection, specifically in patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>The degree of increase in intraocular pressure was compared retrospectively among three groups. Group 1 comprised patients who underwent prior glaucoma filtration surgery (54 eyes). Group 2 included patients with or suspected glaucoma without such surgical history (20 eyes). Group 3 included patients without glaucoma (33 eyes). Pressure measurements were taken before the injection and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months post-injection. A subgroup analysis was performed for pressure &gt; 35 mmHg, &gt; 30 mmHg, &gt; 25 mmHg, and a difference &gt; 10 mmHg between the peak and baseline pressure.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Group 1 consistently displayed lower pressures compared with Group 2, with significant difference at both 1- and 6-month post-injections (15.09 mmHg vs. 18.10 mmHg, <i>P</i> = 0.042 and 13.91 mg vs. 17.25 mmHg, <i>P</i> = 0.040). The proportion of patients in Group 1 and Group 3 with pressures &gt; 25 mmHg, &gt; 30 mmHg, and a difference &gt; 10 mmHg did not significantly differ (15.6% vs. 9.5%, <i>P</i> = 0.231; 3.1% vs. 2.3%, <i>P</i> = 0.867; and 17.1% vs. 7.1%, <i>P</i> = 0.231). Notably, Group 2 exhibited a significantly higher proportion within each category (&gt; 25 mmHg, 24.0%; &gt; 30 mmHg, 20.0%; &gt; 10 mmHg difference, 28.0%).</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusion</h3><p>Intravitreal dexamethasone implant did not increase the risk of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with a history of glaucoma filtration surgery compared with patients with suspected glaucoma; the risk was similar to those without glaucoma.</p>\n","PeriodicalId":12748,"journal":{"name":"Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":"2016 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Graefe's Archive for Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00417-024-06468-z","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate changes in intraocular pressure following intravitreal dexamethasone implant injection, specifically in patients undergoing glaucoma filtration surgery.

Methods

The degree of increase in intraocular pressure was compared retrospectively among three groups. Group 1 comprised patients who underwent prior glaucoma filtration surgery (54 eyes). Group 2 included patients with or suspected glaucoma without such surgical history (20 eyes). Group 3 included patients without glaucoma (33 eyes). Pressure measurements were taken before the injection and at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months post-injection. A subgroup analysis was performed for pressure > 35 mmHg, > 30 mmHg, > 25 mmHg, and a difference > 10 mmHg between the peak and baseline pressure.

Results

Group 1 consistently displayed lower pressures compared with Group 2, with significant difference at both 1- and 6-month post-injections (15.09 mmHg vs. 18.10 mmHg, P = 0.042 and 13.91 mg vs. 17.25 mmHg, P = 0.040). The proportion of patients in Group 1 and Group 3 with pressures > 25 mmHg, > 30 mmHg, and a difference > 10 mmHg did not significantly differ (15.6% vs. 9.5%, P = 0.231; 3.1% vs. 2.3%, P = 0.867; and 17.1% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.231). Notably, Group 2 exhibited a significantly higher proportion within each category (> 25 mmHg, 24.0%; > 30 mmHg, 20.0%; > 10 mmHg difference, 28.0%).

Conclusion

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant did not increase the risk of elevated intraocular pressure in patients with a history of glaucoma filtration surgery compared with patients with suspected glaucoma; the risk was similar to those without glaucoma.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有青光眼滤过手术史的患者在玻璃体内植入地塞米松后眼压的变化
目的 本研究旨在评估玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入物后眼压的变化,特别是接受青光眼滤过手术患者的眼压变化。第一组包括曾接受青光眼滤过手术的患者(54 眼)。第二组包括无此类手术史的青光眼患者或疑似青光眼患者(20 眼)。第 3 组包括无青光眼的患者(33 眼)。在注射前和注射后 1、2、3 和 6 个月测量眼压。结果 第一组的眼压始终低于第二组,注射后 1 个月和 6 个月的眼压差异显著(15.09 mmHg 对 18.10 mmHg,P = 0.042;13.91 mg 对 17.25 mmHg,P = 0.040)。第 1 组和第 3 组中血压大于 25 mmHg、大于 30 mmHg 和相差大于 10 mmHg 的患者比例没有显著差异(15.6% 对 9.5%,P = 0.231;3.1% 对 2.3%,P = 0.867;17.1% 对 7.1%,P = 0.231)。结论与疑似青光眼患者相比,有青光眼滤过手术史的患者使用静脉滴注地塞米松不会增加眼压升高的风险,其风险与无青光眼患者相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Digital health and wearable devices for retinal disease monitoring Safety and efficacy of laser trabeculoplasty compared to drug therapy for the management of open-angle glaucoma: systematic review and meta-analysis study Prevalence of age-related macular degeneration and retinal pseudodrusen in an elderly population. The ural very old study Interpretation of SD-OCT imaging data in real-life conditions versus standardized reading centre analysis in eyes with diabetic macular oedema or macular oedema secondary to retinal vein occlusion: 24-month follow-up of the ORCA study Freiburg vision test (FrACT): optimal number of trials?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1