Belowground exploration by trees and shrubs

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Plant Ecology Pub Date : 2024-04-03 DOI:10.1007/s11258-024-01416-7
Francis E. Putz, Charles D. Canham, Scott V. Ollinger
{"title":"Belowground exploration by trees and shrubs","authors":"Francis E. Putz, Charles D. Canham, Scott V. Ollinger","doi":"10.1007/s11258-024-01416-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Unlike trees, shrubs (i.e., multiple-stemmed woody plants) do not need evenly spaced large diameter structural roots and therefore should be more responsive to heterogeneous distributions of soil resources and spread further per unit belowground biomass. We therefore hypothesized that compared to trees, shrubs respond more to asymmetric distributions of nutrients, reach nutrient-rich patches of soil faster, and do so with less below-ground biomass. To test these three hypotheses, we planted individual seedlings of shrubs (<i>Cornus racemosa, Rhus glabra</i>, and <i>Viburnum dentatum</i>) and trees (<i>Acer rubrum, Betula populifolia</i>, and <i>Fraxinus americana</i>) in the centers of sand-filled rectangular boxes. In one direction we created a stepwise gradient of increasing nutrients with slow-release fertilizer; in the other direction, no fertilizer was added. Seedlings were harvested when their first root reached the plexiglass-covered fertilized end of their box; time taken, above-ground biomass, and below-ground biomass per nutrient segment were determined. Shrubs and trees did not consistently differ in precision of root foraging (i.e., the ratio of biomass in the fertilized and unfertilized soil) or in rates (g/day) and efficiencies (cm/day) of lateral root growth. Interspecific variation appeared more related to species’ habitats than to growth form. The fastest and most efficient roots were produced by the shrub (<i>R. glabra</i>) and the tree (<i>B. populifolia</i>), both characteristic of poor and heterogeneous soils. Root foraging by <i>R. glabra</i> was also facilitated by rapid rhizomatous expansion.</p>","PeriodicalId":20233,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-024-01416-7","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Unlike trees, shrubs (i.e., multiple-stemmed woody plants) do not need evenly spaced large diameter structural roots and therefore should be more responsive to heterogeneous distributions of soil resources and spread further per unit belowground biomass. We therefore hypothesized that compared to trees, shrubs respond more to asymmetric distributions of nutrients, reach nutrient-rich patches of soil faster, and do so with less below-ground biomass. To test these three hypotheses, we planted individual seedlings of shrubs (Cornus racemosa, Rhus glabra, and Viburnum dentatum) and trees (Acer rubrum, Betula populifolia, and Fraxinus americana) in the centers of sand-filled rectangular boxes. In one direction we created a stepwise gradient of increasing nutrients with slow-release fertilizer; in the other direction, no fertilizer was added. Seedlings were harvested when their first root reached the plexiglass-covered fertilized end of their box; time taken, above-ground biomass, and below-ground biomass per nutrient segment were determined. Shrubs and trees did not consistently differ in precision of root foraging (i.e., the ratio of biomass in the fertilized and unfertilized soil) or in rates (g/day) and efficiencies (cm/day) of lateral root growth. Interspecific variation appeared more related to species’ habitats than to growth form. The fastest and most efficient roots were produced by the shrub (R. glabra) and the tree (B. populifolia), both characteristic of poor and heterogeneous soils. Root foraging by R. glabra was also facilitated by rapid rhizomatous expansion.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
树木和灌木的地下勘探
与乔木不同,灌木(即多茎木本植物)不需要均匀分布的大直径结构根,因此对土壤资源的异质性分布反应更灵敏,单位地下生物量的分布范围更广。因此,我们假设,与乔木相比,灌木对非对称的养分分布反应更灵敏,能更快地到达养分丰富的土壤斑块,并能以更少的地下生物量达到这一目的。为了验证这三个假设,我们在装满沙子的长方形盒子的中心分别种植了灌木(山茱萸、鹅掌楸和齿状荚蒾)和乔木(红花槭、白桦和美国梣)的幼苗。在一个方向上,我们用缓释肥创造了一个逐步增加养分的梯度;在另一个方向上,没有添加任何肥料。当幼苗的第一条根到达有机玻璃覆盖的施肥箱一端时,我们就会对其进行收割;然后测定每个营养段所需的时间、地上生物量和地下生物量。灌木和乔木在根系觅食的精确度(即施肥土壤和未施肥土壤中生物量的比率)或侧根生长速率(克/天)和效率(厘米/天)方面并无一致差异。种间差异似乎更多地与物种的栖息地而非生长形式有关。灌木(R. glabra)和乔木(B. populifolia)的根生长速度最快、效率最高,这两种植物都生长在贫瘠和多质的土壤中。根状茎的快速扩展也促进了草履榕的根系觅食。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Ecology
Plant Ecology 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Plant Ecology publishes original scientific papers that report and interpret the findings of pure and applied research into the ecology of vascular plants in terrestrial and wetland ecosystems. Empirical, experimental, theoretical and review papers reporting on ecophysiology, population, community, ecosystem, landscape, molecular and historical ecology are within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Ski slopes as an unrecognized source of human impact on vegetation Effects of host size and substrate types on the distribution of accidental and obligate epiphytes: a case study in a temperate forest of Japan Effect of competition, with exotic invasive Bromus inermis and native Quercus stellata, and soil amendment on the performance of native invasive Juniperus virginiana Modelling landscape-scale occurrences of common grassland species in a topographically complex mountainous environment Prediction of historical, current and future potential distribution of Rhus chinensis (Anacardiaceae) based on the optimized MaxEnt model in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1