How do plants reduce erosion? An Eco Evidence assessment

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ECOLOGY Plant Ecology Pub Date : 2024-04-13 DOI:10.1007/s11258-024-01414-9
A. C. Dahanayake, J. A. Webb, J. Greet, J. D. Brookes
{"title":"How do plants reduce erosion? An Eco Evidence assessment","authors":"A. C. Dahanayake, J. A. Webb, J. Greet, J. D. Brookes","doi":"10.1007/s11258-024-01414-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Soil erosion adversely impacts natural and human environments globally. Vegetation is often used as a sustainable approach to mitigate erosion. Although using vegetation to reduce erosion is a widely accepted concept, how different plant traits mitigate different mechanisms of erosion, and the generality of these mechanisms has not been well demonstrated. We developed ten hypotheses on how different plant traits (roots, leaves, and stems) act to reduce erosion through different mechanisms (binding soil particles, promoting suspended sediment deposition and reducing the energy of waves, runoff, and wind). We then conducted a rapid evidence assessment of the scientific literature using the Eco Evidence method. We found strong evidence to support our overarching hypothesis—an increase in plant abundance reduces erosion. We also found support for the specific hypotheses that plant roots bind soil particles and that greater plant stem density and leaf area reduce surface run-off and promote sediment deposition. There was insufficient evidence to support the hypotheses that an increase in stem density or leaf area reduces wave or wind energy. None of our hypotheses were rejected. Species with higher root and stem densities and greater leaf area will be the most effective in mitigating erosion. Our review highlights that there is insufficient evidence regarding some potentially important mechanisms between vegetation and erosion, making these prospective areas for further research. Our results have the potential to aid environmental engineers when designing schemes to reduce erosion and ecologists and managers who are concerned about the conservation and restoration of erosion-prone environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":20233,"journal":{"name":"Plant Ecology","volume":"44 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Plant Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-024-01414-9","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Soil erosion adversely impacts natural and human environments globally. Vegetation is often used as a sustainable approach to mitigate erosion. Although using vegetation to reduce erosion is a widely accepted concept, how different plant traits mitigate different mechanisms of erosion, and the generality of these mechanisms has not been well demonstrated. We developed ten hypotheses on how different plant traits (roots, leaves, and stems) act to reduce erosion through different mechanisms (binding soil particles, promoting suspended sediment deposition and reducing the energy of waves, runoff, and wind). We then conducted a rapid evidence assessment of the scientific literature using the Eco Evidence method. We found strong evidence to support our overarching hypothesis—an increase in plant abundance reduces erosion. We also found support for the specific hypotheses that plant roots bind soil particles and that greater plant stem density and leaf area reduce surface run-off and promote sediment deposition. There was insufficient evidence to support the hypotheses that an increase in stem density or leaf area reduces wave or wind energy. None of our hypotheses were rejected. Species with higher root and stem densities and greater leaf area will be the most effective in mitigating erosion. Our review highlights that there is insufficient evidence regarding some potentially important mechanisms between vegetation and erosion, making these prospective areas for further research. Our results have the potential to aid environmental engineers when designing schemes to reduce erosion and ecologists and managers who are concerned about the conservation and restoration of erosion-prone environments.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
植物如何减少侵蚀?生态证据评估
土壤侵蚀对全球的自然和人类环境造成了不利影响。植被通常被用作减轻侵蚀的可持续方法。虽然利用植被减少侵蚀是一个广为接受的概念,但不同植物的特性如何缓解不同的侵蚀机制,以及这些机制的普遍性还没有得到很好的证明。我们就不同植物性状(根、叶和茎)如何通过不同机制(结合土壤颗粒、促进悬浮沉积物沉积以及降低波浪、径流和风的能量)减少侵蚀提出了十项假设。随后,我们使用生态证据法对科学文献进行了快速证据评估。我们发现了有力的证据来支持我们的总体假设--植物丰度的增加可减少侵蚀。我们还发现,植物根系能粘合土壤颗粒,植物茎干密度和叶片面积增加能减少地表径流并促进沉积物沉积等具体假设也得到了支持。没有足够的证据支持茎密度或叶面积的增加会降低波能或风能的假设。我们的假设均未被否定。根茎密度更高、叶片面积更大的物种在减轻侵蚀方面最为有效。我们的综述强调,关于植被与侵蚀之间的一些潜在重要机制,目前还没有足够的证据,因此这些领域有望得到进一步研究。我们的研究结果有可能帮助环境工程师设计减少侵蚀的方案,也有可能帮助关注易受侵蚀环境的保护和恢复的生态学家和管理者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Plant Ecology
Plant Ecology 环境科学-林学
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
8.6 months
期刊介绍: Plant Ecology publishes original scientific papers that report and interpret the findings of pure and applied research into the ecology of vascular plants in terrestrial and wetland ecosystems. Empirical, experimental, theoretical and review papers reporting on ecophysiology, population, community, ecosystem, landscape, molecular and historical ecology are within the scope of the journal.
期刊最新文献
Ski slopes as an unrecognized source of human impact on vegetation Effects of host size and substrate types on the distribution of accidental and obligate epiphytes: a case study in a temperate forest of Japan Effect of competition, with exotic invasive Bromus inermis and native Quercus stellata, and soil amendment on the performance of native invasive Juniperus virginiana Modelling landscape-scale occurrences of common grassland species in a topographically complex mountainous environment Prediction of historical, current and future potential distribution of Rhus chinensis (Anacardiaceae) based on the optimized MaxEnt model in China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1