Analyzing the atmospheric dispersion correction of the Gemini Planet Imager: residual dispersion above design requirements

IF 1.7 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1117/1.jatis.10.2.025002
Malachi Noel, Jason J. Wang, Bruce Macintosh, Katie Crotts, Christian Marois, Eric L. Nielsen, Robert J. De Rosa, Katie Scalzo, Kent Wallace
{"title":"Analyzing the atmospheric dispersion correction of the Gemini Planet Imager: residual dispersion above design requirements","authors":"Malachi Noel, Jason J. Wang, Bruce Macintosh, Katie Crotts, Christian Marois, Eric L. Nielsen, Robert J. De Rosa, Katie Scalzo, Kent Wallace","doi":"10.1117/1.jatis.10.2.025002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC) of the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI) corrects the chromatic dispersion caused by differential atmospheric refraction (DAR), making it an important optic for exoplanet observation. Despite requiring <5 mas of residual DAR to avoid potentially affecting the coronagraph, the GPI ADC averages ∼7 and ∼11 mas of residual DAR in H and J band, respectively. We analyzed GPI data in those bands to find explanations for the underperformance. We found the model GPI uses to predict DAR underestimates humidity’s impact on incident DAR, causing on average a 0.54 mas increase in H band residual DAR. Additionally, the GPI ADC consistently undercorrects in H band by about 7 mas, causing almost all the H band residual DAR. J band does not have such an offset. Perpendicular dispersion induced by the GPI ADC, potentially from a misalignment in the prisms’ relative orientation, causes 86% of the residual DAR in J band. Correcting these issues could reduce residual DAR, thereby improving exoplanet detection. We also made an approximation for the index of refraction of air from 0.7 to 1.36 microns that more accurately accounts for the effects of humidity.","PeriodicalId":54342,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Astronomical Telescopes Instruments and Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jatis.10.2.025002","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The atmospheric dispersion corrector (ADC) of the Gemini Planet Imager (GPI) corrects the chromatic dispersion caused by differential atmospheric refraction (DAR), making it an important optic for exoplanet observation. Despite requiring <5 mas of residual DAR to avoid potentially affecting the coronagraph, the GPI ADC averages ∼7 and ∼11 mas of residual DAR in H and J band, respectively. We analyzed GPI data in those bands to find explanations for the underperformance. We found the model GPI uses to predict DAR underestimates humidity’s impact on incident DAR, causing on average a 0.54 mas increase in H band residual DAR. Additionally, the GPI ADC consistently undercorrects in H band by about 7 mas, causing almost all the H band residual DAR. J band does not have such an offset. Perpendicular dispersion induced by the GPI ADC, potentially from a misalignment in the prisms’ relative orientation, causes 86% of the residual DAR in J band. Correcting these issues could reduce residual DAR, thereby improving exoplanet detection. We also made an approximation for the index of refraction of air from 0.7 to 1.36 microns that more accurately accounts for the effects of humidity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分析双子座行星成像仪的大气色散校正:超出设计要求的残余色散
双子座行星成像仪(GPI)的大气色散校正器(ADC)可以校正由大气折射差(DAR)引起的色散,是观测系外行星的重要光学设备。尽管为了避免对日冕仪造成潜在影响,要求残余 DAR 小于 5mas,但 GPI ADC 在 H 波段和 J 波段的平均残余 DAR 分别为 7mas 和 11mas 。我们对这些波段的 GPI 数据进行了分析,以找出性能不佳的原因。我们发现,GPI用来预测DAR的模型低估了湿度对入射DAR的影响,导致H波段的残余DAR平均增加了0.54mas。此外,GPI ADC 在 H 波段的校正一直不足约 7mas,导致几乎所有 H 波段的残余 DAR。J 波段则没有这种偏移。GPI ADC 引起的垂直色散(可能是棱镜相对方向的偏差)造成了 J 波段 86% 的残余 DAR。纠正这些问题可以减少残余 DAR,从而改进系外行星探测。我们还对 0.7 至 1.36 微米的空气折射率进行了近似,以更准确地考虑湿度的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
119
期刊介绍: The Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems publishes peer-reviewed papers reporting on original research in the development, testing, and application of telescopes, instrumentation, techniques, and systems for ground- and space-based astronomy.
期刊最新文献
Design, implementation, and performance of the primary reflector for SALTUS Solar system science with the Single Aperture Large Telescope for Universe Studies space observatory Milky Way and nearby galaxy science with the SALTUS space observatory Adjustable X-ray optics: thin-film actuator measurement and figure correction performance FIREBall-2 UV balloon telescope in-flight calibration system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1