Risk factors for diaphragmatic injury in subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery

Maodan Chen, Yang Huang, Juyi Hu, Longfei Jia, Yuanzhou Wu, Jing Feng, Fuwei Zhang, Jian Tong, Qunqing Chen, Hui Li
{"title":"Risk factors for diaphragmatic injury in subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery","authors":"Maodan Chen, Yang Huang, Juyi Hu, Longfei Jia, Yuanzhou Wu, Jing Feng, Fuwei Zhang, Jian Tong, Qunqing Chen, Hui Li","doi":"10.1007/s00464-024-10789-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Background</h3><p>Subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered a safe and feasible operation for anterior mediastinal mass resection. However, diaphragmatic injury, presented as tearing or puncturing, may occur during subxiphoid VATS despite of low incidence. This study aims to explore risk factors for diaphragmatic injury in subxiphoid VATS, as well as strategies to reduce occurrence of the injury.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Methods</h3><p>We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 44 consecutive adult patients who underwent subxiphoid VATS. These patients were divided into two groups: diaphragmatic injury group and non-injury group. Perioperative outcomes and anatomic features derived from 3D CT reconstructions were compared between the two groups.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Results</h3><p>Significant differences were observed in operation time (223.25 ± 92.57 vs. 136.28 ± 53.05, <i>P</i> = 0.006), xiphoid length (6.47 ± 0.85 vs. 4.79 ± 1.04, <i>P</i> = 0.001) and length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm (24.86 ± 12.02 vs. 14.61 ± 9.25, <i>P</i> = 0.029). Odds ratio for the length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm was 1.09 (1.001–1.186), <i>P</i> = 0.048 by binary logistic regression analysis.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Conclusions</h3><p>We identified the length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm as an independent risk factor for diaphragm injury during subxiphoid VATS. Prior to subxiphoid VATS, a 3D chest CT reconstruction is recommended to assess the patients’ anatomic variations within the xiphoid process. For patients with longer xiphoid process, a higher incision at the middle and upper part of the xiphoid process, and partial xiphoid process resection or xiphoidectomy is preferred.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>\n","PeriodicalId":501625,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10789-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is considered a safe and feasible operation for anterior mediastinal mass resection. However, diaphragmatic injury, presented as tearing or puncturing, may occur during subxiphoid VATS despite of low incidence. This study aims to explore risk factors for diaphragmatic injury in subxiphoid VATS, as well as strategies to reduce occurrence of the injury.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of 44 consecutive adult patients who underwent subxiphoid VATS. These patients were divided into two groups: diaphragmatic injury group and non-injury group. Perioperative outcomes and anatomic features derived from 3D CT reconstructions were compared between the two groups.

Results

Significant differences were observed in operation time (223.25 ± 92.57 vs. 136.28 ± 53.05, P = 0.006), xiphoid length (6.47 ± 0.85 vs. 4.79 ± 1.04, P = 0.001) and length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm (24.86 ± 12.02 vs. 14.61 ± 9.25, P = 0.029). Odds ratio for the length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm was 1.09 (1.001–1.186), P = 0.048 by binary logistic regression analysis.

Conclusions

We identified the length of the xiphoid below the attachment point on the diaphragm as an independent risk factor for diaphragm injury during subxiphoid VATS. Prior to subxiphoid VATS, a 3D chest CT reconstruction is recommended to assess the patients’ anatomic variations within the xiphoid process. For patients with longer xiphoid process, a higher incision at the middle and upper part of the xiphoid process, and partial xiphoid process resection or xiphoidectomy is preferred.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剑突下视频辅助胸腔镜手术中膈肌损伤的风险因素
背景剑突下视频辅助胸腔镜手术(VATS)被认为是一种安全可行的前纵隔肿块切除手术。然而,尽管剑突下 VATS 的发生率较低,但仍可能发生膈肌损伤(表现为撕裂或穿刺)。本研究旨在探讨剑突下 VATS 中膈肌损伤的风险因素,以及减少损伤发生的策略。这些患者被分为两组:膈肌损伤组和非损伤组。结果观察到两组患者的手术时间存在显著差异(223.25 ± 92.57 vs. 136.28 ± 53.05,P = 0.006)。05, P = 0.006)、剑突长度(6.47 ± 0.85 vs. 4.79 ± 1.04, P = 0.001)和剑突在膈肌附着点以下的长度(24.86 ± 12.02 vs. 14.61 ± 9.25, P = 0.029)存在显著差异。通过二元逻辑回归分析,剑突长度低于膈肌附着点的风险比为 1.09 (1.001-1.186),P = 0.048。结论我们发现剑突长度低于膈肌附着点是剑突下 VATS 期间膈肌损伤的独立风险因素。建议在剑突下 VATS 手术前进行三维胸部 CT 重建,以评估患者剑突内的解剖结构变化。对于剑突较长的患者,最好在剑突的中上部做一个较高的切口,并进行剑突部分切除或剑突切除术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Short-term gut microbiota’s shift after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y vs one anastomosis gastric bypass: results of a multicenter randomized control trial Classifying frailty in the ventral hernia population Retrospective study on endoscopic treatment of recurrent esophageal cancer patients after radiotherapy State of the art medical devices for fluorescence-guided surgery (FGS): technical review and future developments Conquering the common bile duct: outcomes in minimally invasive transcystic common bile duct exploration versus ERCP
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1