Modified Gritti-Stokes amputation: tips and tricks.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Efort Open Reviews Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1530/eor-23-0118
Laura Walthert, Michael Ris, Kevin Moerenhout, Sébastien Déglise, Pietro Giovanni Di Summa, Sylvain Steinmetz
{"title":"Modified Gritti-Stokes amputation: tips and tricks.","authors":"Laura Walthert, Michael Ris, Kevin Moerenhout, Sébastien Déglise, Pietro Giovanni Di Summa, Sylvain Steinmetz","doi":"10.1530/eor-23-0118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Major amputations of the lower extremity may be required after trauma and a variety of underlying diseases such as peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and malignancies. The goal of any major amputation is an optimal functional result with a maximum limb length in combination with optimal wound healing. The preservation of the knee joint is essential for successful rehabilitation, and this is best achieved by the Burgess below-knee amputation (BKA). Whenever a BKA is not possible, the Gritti-Stokes amputation is our first choice. This technique mainly consists of a through-knee amputation with the creation of a pedicled patella flap consisting of the patella, patellar ligament, and overlying soft tissue. After osteotomy of the distal femur and resection of the articular surface of the patella, the anterior flap is rotated in order to cover the femur defect while performing a patellofemoral arthrodesis. The aim of this paper is to describe our surgical technique and experience with GSA and to point out the important steps of this procedure. In conclusion, GSA is an excellent surgical option for patients requiring major lower limb amputations where BKA cannot be considered. Particular attention must be paid to careful preoperative evaluation and optimization of comorbidities. A meticulous surgical technique is warranted, including atraumatic tissue handling and an optimal patellofemoral arthrodesis technique.","PeriodicalId":48598,"journal":{"name":"Efort Open Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Efort Open Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/eor-23-0118","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Major amputations of the lower extremity may be required after trauma and a variety of underlying diseases such as peripheral vascular disease, diabetes, and malignancies. The goal of any major amputation is an optimal functional result with a maximum limb length in combination with optimal wound healing. The preservation of the knee joint is essential for successful rehabilitation, and this is best achieved by the Burgess below-knee amputation (BKA). Whenever a BKA is not possible, the Gritti-Stokes amputation is our first choice. This technique mainly consists of a through-knee amputation with the creation of a pedicled patella flap consisting of the patella, patellar ligament, and overlying soft tissue. After osteotomy of the distal femur and resection of the articular surface of the patella, the anterior flap is rotated in order to cover the femur defect while performing a patellofemoral arthrodesis. The aim of this paper is to describe our surgical technique and experience with GSA and to point out the important steps of this procedure. In conclusion, GSA is an excellent surgical option for patients requiring major lower limb amputations where BKA cannot be considered. Particular attention must be paid to careful preoperative evaluation and optimization of comorbidities. A meticulous surgical technique is warranted, including atraumatic tissue handling and an optimal patellofemoral arthrodesis technique.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
改良格里蒂-斯托克斯截肢术:技巧和窍门。
外伤和各种潜在疾病(如外周血管疾病、糖尿病和恶性肿瘤)可能会导致下肢大截肢。任何大截肢手术的目标都是获得最佳功能效果、最大肢体长度以及最佳伤口愈合。保留膝关节是成功康复的关键,而伯吉斯膝下截肢术(BKA)是实现这一目标的最佳方法。如果无法采用 Burgess 膝下截肢术,格里蒂-斯托克斯截肢术则是我们的首选。这种技术主要是通过膝关节截肢,并制作一个由髌骨、髌韧带和覆盖软组织组成的有蒂髌骨瓣。在对股骨远端进行截骨并切除髌骨关节面后,旋转前方皮瓣以覆盖股骨缺损,同时进行髌骨股骨关节置换术。本文旨在介绍我们在GSA方面的手术技巧和经验,并指出该手术的重要步骤。总之,对于无法考虑 BKA 的下肢大截肢患者来说,GSA 是一种极佳的手术选择。必须特别注意术前仔细评估和优化合并症。手术技术必须一丝不苟,包括无创伤的组织处理和最佳的髌股关节连接技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Efort Open Reviews
Efort Open Reviews Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.90%
发文量
101
审稿时长
13 weeks
期刊介绍: EFORT Open Reviews publishes high-quality instructional review articles across the whole field of orthopaedics and traumatology. Commissioned, peer-reviewed articles from international experts summarize current knowledge and practice in orthopaedics, with the aim of providing systematic coverage of the field. All articles undergo rigorous scientific editing to ensure the highest standards of accuracy and clarity. This continuously published online journal is fully open access and will provide integrated CME. It is an authoritative resource for educating trainees and supports practising orthopaedic surgeons in keeping informed about the latest clinical and scientific advances. One print issue containing a selection of papers from the journal will be published each year to coincide with the EFORT Annual Congress. EFORT Open Reviews is the official journal of the European Federation of National Associations of Orthopaedics and Traumatology (EFORT) and is published in partnership with The British Editorial Society of Bone & Joint Surgery.
期刊最新文献
Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests. Efficacy and safety of vancomycin for local application in the prevention of surgical site infection after joint arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Kaplan fibers of iliotibial band: a comprehensive review of current literature. Native intra-articular knee microbiome is a matter of facts: a systematic review of clinical evidence. Prevalence and risk factors of low back pain in military personnel: a systematic review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1