Maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries at 39 weeks compared to deliveries at 40 weeks in pregnant women with diet controlled gestational diabetes mellitus

IF 0.7 4区 医学 Q4 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries Pub Date : 2024-04-06 DOI:10.1007/s13410-024-01333-5
{"title":"Maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries at 39 weeks compared to deliveries at 40 weeks in pregnant women with diet controlled gestational diabetes mellitus","authors":"","doi":"10.1007/s13410-024-01333-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Abstract</h3> <span> <h3>Objective</h3> <p>Current guidelines do not provide convincing conclusions for the ideal time of delivery in women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aim to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries at 39 weeks compared to deliveries at 40 weeks in pregnant women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Methods</h3> <p>This prospective observational cohort study included 219 pregnant women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes who delivered at 39 weeks (106 patients) or 40 weeks (113 patients) in our center from January 2017 to January 2018. Maternal and neonatal characteristics and outcomes were collected and compared between these two groups based on gestational age.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Results</h3> <p>There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups in delivery mode (<em>p</em> = 0.581), macrosomia (6.6% vs. 10.6%, <em>p</em> = 1). The rate of postpartum hemorrhage, uterine atony, and perineal laceration (3rd and 4th grades) of the study groups was not significantly different. Considering neonatal outcomes, there were no significant differences in the incidence of intrauterine growth restriction, low Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and thick meconium between two groups (<em>p</em> &gt; 0.05). The incidence of shoulder dystocia and preeclampsia in women who delivered at 40 weeks was slightly higher than in women who delivered at 39 weeks (0% vs. 3.5% (<em>p</em> = 0.122) and 2.8% vs. 9.7% (<em>p</em> = 0.051), respectively). Neither of these differences was statistically significant.</p> </span> <span> <h3>Conclusion</h3> <p>There were no statistically significant differences in maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes who delivered at 39 weeks compared to women who delivered at 40 weeks. However, the observed higher rate of shoulder dystocia and preeclampsia among women who delivered at 40 weeks might need to be investigated further in larger studies while it might indicate the need for iatrogenic intervention at 39 weeks.</p> </span>","PeriodicalId":50328,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s13410-024-01333-5","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Current guidelines do not provide convincing conclusions for the ideal time of delivery in women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). We aim to compare maternal and neonatal outcomes of deliveries at 39 weeks compared to deliveries at 40 weeks in pregnant women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes mellitus.

Methods

This prospective observational cohort study included 219 pregnant women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes who delivered at 39 weeks (106 patients) or 40 weeks (113 patients) in our center from January 2017 to January 2018. Maternal and neonatal characteristics and outcomes were collected and compared between these two groups based on gestational age.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference between these two groups in delivery mode (p = 0.581), macrosomia (6.6% vs. 10.6%, p = 1). The rate of postpartum hemorrhage, uterine atony, and perineal laceration (3rd and 4th grades) of the study groups was not significantly different. Considering neonatal outcomes, there were no significant differences in the incidence of intrauterine growth restriction, low Apgar score, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and thick meconium between two groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of shoulder dystocia and preeclampsia in women who delivered at 40 weeks was slightly higher than in women who delivered at 39 weeks (0% vs. 3.5% (p = 0.122) and 2.8% vs. 9.7% (p = 0.051), respectively). Neither of these differences was statistically significant.

Conclusion

There were no statistically significant differences in maternal and neonatal adverse outcomes in women with diet-controlled gestational diabetes who delivered at 39 weeks compared to women who delivered at 40 weeks. However, the observed higher rate of shoulder dystocia and preeclampsia among women who delivered at 40 weeks might need to be investigated further in larger studies while it might indicate the need for iatrogenic intervention at 39 weeks.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
饮食控制型妊娠糖尿病孕妇 39 周分娩与 40 周分娩的产妇和新生儿结局比较
摘要 目的 目前的指南并未就饮食控制型妊娠糖尿病(GDM)妇女的理想分娩时间提供令人信服的结论。我们旨在比较饮食控制型妊娠糖尿病孕妇在 39 周分娩与 40 周分娩的产妇和新生儿结局。 方法 这项前瞻性观察性队列研究纳入了本中心2017年1月至2018年1月期间在39周(106名患者)或40周(113名患者)分娩的219名饮食控制型妊娠糖尿病孕妇。研究收集了这两组孕妇和新生儿的特征和结局,并根据孕龄对这两组孕妇和新生儿的特征和结局进行了比较。 结果 两组在分娩方式(P = 0.581)、巨大儿(6.6% vs. 10.6%,P = 1)方面无统计学差异。研究组的产后出血率、子宫无张力率和会阴裂伤(3 级和 4 级)无明显差异。新生儿结局方面,两组间宫内生长受限、低 Apgar 评分、新生儿重症监护室入院和胎粪过厚的发生率无明显差异(P > 0.05)。40 周分娩的产妇肩难产和子痫前期的发生率略高于 39 周分娩的产妇(分别为 0% vs. 3.5% (p = 0.122) 和 2.8% vs. 9.7% (p = 0.051))。这两项差异均无统计学意义。 结论 与在 40 周分娩的产妇相比,在 39 周分娩的饮食控制型妊娠糖尿病产妇在产妇和新生儿不良结局方面没有统计学意义上的显著差异。然而,在 40 周分娩的产妇中,肩难产和先兆子痫的发生率较高,这可能需要在更大规模的研究中进一步调查,同时这可能表明需要在 39 周时进行先天性干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
109
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: International Journal of Diabetes in Developing Countries is the official journal of Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India. This is a peer reviewed journal and targets a readership consisting of clinicians, research workers, paramedical personnel, nutritionists and health care personnel working in the field of diabetes. Original research articles focusing on clinical and patient care issues including newer therapies and technologies as well as basic science issues in this field are considered for publication in the journal. Systematic reviews of interest to the above group of readers are also accepted.
期刊最新文献
Prevalence of obesity and cardiometabolic risk factors among Alavi Bohra adult women Enhancing comprehensive diabetic care: A smartphone fundus camera with an offline AI-powered diabetic retinopathy screening solution for physicians Usefulness of sudomotor function assessment in individuals with type-2 diabetes: A case–control study The effect of high-concentration CO2-enriched water on sensory neuropathy in patients with diabetes referred to an endocrine clinic Clinical profile of monogenic diabetes: A case series from a single South Indian diabetes clinic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1