Do Interactions Between Investors and Management Result in More Conservative Accounting Information?*

IF 1.8 4区 经济学 Q2 BUSINESS, FINANCE Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies Pub Date : 2024-04-04 DOI:10.1111/ajfs.12468
Yaoyao Li, Tianmei Wang, Yang Zhao
{"title":"Do Interactions Between Investors and Management Result in More Conservative Accounting Information?*","authors":"Yaoyao Li,&nbsp;Tianmei Wang,&nbsp;Yang Zhao","doi":"10.1111/ajfs.12468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Within the context of the investor–management interaction platforms “E-Interaction” and “Interaction Easy,” this paper investigates the influence of investor and management interaction on accounting conservatism and explores the strategic response behavior of management. The findings indicate that both the intensity and depth of investor inquiries contribute to the enhancement of accounting conservatism. Moreover, compared to “template” responses, management's “targeted” responses to investors significantly increase the accounting conservatism of companies. Mechanism tests reveal that investor–management interaction, by enhancing investor monitoring capabilities and increasing the litigation and reputational risks faced by companies, subsequently enhances the accounting conservatism of companies. Further analysis shows that in cases where companies are audited by non-Big Four auditor and have lower analyst coverage, indicating a weaker external information environment, investor–management interaction can yield better governance effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":8570,"journal":{"name":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies","volume":"53 2","pages":"155-199"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia-Pacific Journal of Financial Studies","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajfs.12468","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Within the context of the investor–management interaction platforms “E-Interaction” and “Interaction Easy,” this paper investigates the influence of investor and management interaction on accounting conservatism and explores the strategic response behavior of management. The findings indicate that both the intensity and depth of investor inquiries contribute to the enhancement of accounting conservatism. Moreover, compared to “template” responses, management's “targeted” responses to investors significantly increase the accounting conservatism of companies. Mechanism tests reveal that investor–management interaction, by enhancing investor monitoring capabilities and increasing the litigation and reputational risks faced by companies, subsequently enhances the accounting conservatism of companies. Further analysis shows that in cases where companies are audited by non-Big Four auditor and have lower analyst coverage, indicating a weaker external information environment, investor–management interaction can yield better governance effects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
投资者与管理层之间的互动是否会导致会计信息更加保守?
本文以 "E互动 "和 "互动易 "投资者与管理层互动平台为背景,研究了投资者与管理层互动对会计保守主义的影响,并探讨了管理层的战略应对行为。研究结果表明,投资者询问的强度和深度都有助于提高会计保守主义。此外,与 "模板式 "回应相比,管理层对投资者的 "针对性 "回应能显著提高公司的会计保守性。机制测试表明,投资者与管理层的互动,通过增强投资者的监督能力,增加了公司面临的诉讼和声誉风险,从而增强了公司的会计稳健性。进一步的分析表明,如果公司由非四大审计师审计,分析师覆盖率较低,表明外部信息环境较弱,那么投资者与管理层的互动会产生更好的治理效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Acknowledgement Does Bold Forecast After Job Change Improve Forecast Accuracy? Evidence From Korean Sell‐Side Analysts Do Audit Efforts Reduce Stock Price Crash Risk? The Role of Corporate Governance Canadian Bank Capital and Liquidity Creation*
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1