Nutrient transformations based on sampling scheme and cropping system following subsurface-banded poultry litter

A. J. Ashworth, H. Amorim, P. A. Moore Jr., T. A. Adams, C. Nieman, P. R. Owens
{"title":"Nutrient transformations based on sampling scheme and cropping system following subsurface-banded poultry litter","authors":"A. J. Ashworth,&nbsp;H. Amorim,&nbsp;P. A. Moore Jr.,&nbsp;T. A. Adams,&nbsp;C. Nieman,&nbsp;P. R. Owens","doi":"10.1002/saj2.20672","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Poultry litter (PL) is an excellent source of micro- and macronutrients. However, surface applications result in greater nutrient runoff and nitrogen loss via ammonia volatilization. Subsurface banding PL is a promising technology for combating these challenges, but scant information exists on proper soil sampling techniques and management recommendations for subsurface-applied PL. Therefore, objectives were to quantify the nutrient status based on sampling depth (0–15 cm and 15–30 cm) and schema (systematic [0, 3, 7, and 10 cm from PL bands] and composite) to develop subsurface PL recommendations per system (annual cropping and perennial pasture). Soil samples were collected during PL application (subsurface and surface) and 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months thereafter. On average, total N, Mehlich-3 extractable P, and Mehlich-3 extractable K were 15%, 96%, and 72% greater, respectively, for subsurface compared to surface applications. Further, Mehlich-3 and water-soluble P at the 0- to 15-cm depth were 4–5 and 2–3 times greater in soils receiving subsurface PL in perennial pasture and row crop systems, respectively, compared to surface applications, likely owing to lesser nutrient losses to the air, soil, and water under subsurface PL systems. Compared to surface applications, subsurface PL increased (<i>p </i>&lt; 0.05) N, P, and K crop removal by 75%, 70%, and 72%, respectively, and resulted in 80% and 78% yield increases and N-use efficiency, respectively. Consequently, subsurface PL conserved greater N, P, and K at the 0- to 15-cm depth, thus increasing nutrient-use efficiency in row crop systems and improving water quality in sensitive watersheds.</p>","PeriodicalId":101043,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/saj2.20672","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings - Soil Science Society of America","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/saj2.20672","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Poultry litter (PL) is an excellent source of micro- and macronutrients. However, surface applications result in greater nutrient runoff and nitrogen loss via ammonia volatilization. Subsurface banding PL is a promising technology for combating these challenges, but scant information exists on proper soil sampling techniques and management recommendations for subsurface-applied PL. Therefore, objectives were to quantify the nutrient status based on sampling depth (0–15 cm and 15–30 cm) and schema (systematic [0, 3, 7, and 10 cm from PL bands] and composite) to develop subsurface PL recommendations per system (annual cropping and perennial pasture). Soil samples were collected during PL application (subsurface and surface) and 1, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months thereafter. On average, total N, Mehlich-3 extractable P, and Mehlich-3 extractable K were 15%, 96%, and 72% greater, respectively, for subsurface compared to surface applications. Further, Mehlich-3 and water-soluble P at the 0- to 15-cm depth were 4–5 and 2–3 times greater in soils receiving subsurface PL in perennial pasture and row crop systems, respectively, compared to surface applications, likely owing to lesser nutrient losses to the air, soil, and water under subsurface PL systems. Compared to surface applications, subsurface PL increased (< 0.05) N, P, and K crop removal by 75%, 70%, and 72%, respectively, and resulted in 80% and 78% yield increases and N-use efficiency, respectively. Consequently, subsurface PL conserved greater N, P, and K at the 0- to 15-cm depth, thus increasing nutrient-use efficiency in row crop systems and improving water quality in sensitive watersheds.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于采样方案和耕作制度的次表层带状家禽粪便后的营养转化
家禽粪便(PL)是微量和大量营养元素的绝佳来源。然而,地表施用会导致更多的养分径流和氮通过氨挥发而流失。地下带状施用 PL 是应对这些挑战的一项很有前景的技术,但有关地下施用 PL 的适当土壤采样技术和管理建议的信息却很少。因此,我们的目标是根据取样深度(0-15 厘米和 15-30 厘米)和模式(系统取样[距 PL 带 0、3、7 和 10 厘米]和复合取样)量化养分状况,为每个系统(一年生作物和多年生牧草)制定地下 PL 建议。在施用可 PL(地下和地表)期间及其后 1、6、12、18 和 24 个月收集土壤样本。与地表施肥相比,地表下施肥的总氮、Mehlich-3 可提取磷和 Mehlich-3 可提取钾平均分别高出 15%、96% 和 72%。此外,与地表施肥相比,在多年生牧草和连作系统中,接受地表下可 PL 肥料的土壤中 0-15 厘米深度的 Mehlich-3 和水溶性 P 分别是地表施肥的 4-5 倍和 2-3 倍,这可能是由于地表下可 PL 肥料系统中空气、土壤和水中的养分损失较少。与地表施肥相比,地下可 PL 使作物对氮、磷和钾的去除率分别提高了 75%、70% 和 72%(p < 0.05),并使产量和氮利用效率分别提高了 80% 和 78%。因此,地表下可 PL 在 0 至 15 厘米深度保存了更多的氮、磷和钾,从而提高了连作系统的养分利用效率,改善了敏感流域的水质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Proceedings of the 14th North American Forest Soils Conference Soil chemical properties affecting grain yield and oil content of crambe biofuel crop Particulate organic carbon and nitrogen and soil-test biological activity under grazed pastures and conservation land uses Determining microbial metabolic limitation under the influence of moss patch size from soil extracellular enzyme stoichiometry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1