Powerlifting participation and engagement across all ages: A retrospective, longitudinal, population analysis with comparison to community strength norms

IF 1.5 4区 教育学 Q3 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching Pub Date : 2024-04-02 DOI:10.1177/17479541241244481
Daniel J van den Hoek, Alistair Mallard, Joel M Garrett, Patrick L Beaumont, Robert J Howells, Jemima G Spathis, Joshua Pearson, Christopher Latella
{"title":"Powerlifting participation and engagement across all ages: A retrospective, longitudinal, population analysis with comparison to community strength norms","authors":"Daniel J van den Hoek, Alistair Mallard, Joel M Garrett, Patrick L Beaumont, Robert J Howells, Jemima G Spathis, Joshua Pearson, Christopher Latella","doi":"10.1177/17479541241244481","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundIn Australia, one-third of people ≥15 years perform regular resistance training and 90% of those do not meet current health guidelines. All age groups should engage in regular resistance exercise, to maintain strength and function.ObjectivesTo identify trends in powerlifting competition participation in Australia by sex and age group from 1968 to 2022, and to compare the strength of powerlifting competitors to population age- and sex-based normative values.MethodThe number of unique participants and total competition entries for each year were analysed using Australian powerlifting competition data. Subdomains of age and sex were investigated, and mean ± SD, frequency, range, and trend analyses reported. United Nations age classifications were used to identify age trends. Comparisons to population strength norms were explored descriptively.ResultsWe included 21,514 individual competitors from 1942 powerlifting competitions between 1968 and 2022. Exponential growth was seen in competition entries from 115 in 1981, to 759 in 1994, 1014 in 2011, and to 6803 in 2022, (R<jats:sup>2 </jats:sup>= 0.86). At first participation 18–25-year olds (51.1%) followed by ≥36 years (16%) were most represented. Strength comparison to available population norms demonstrates superior upper- (bench press [most competitors above 70<jats:sup>th</jats:sup> percentile) and lower-body (squat [majority rated ‘excellent’) strength.ConclusionsSuperior strength levels of powerlifters further the evidence base for this sport as an effective way to develop muscular strength, with low injury. We advocate for public health promotion and additional support for powerlifting as an underutilised community health tool.","PeriodicalId":47767,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17479541241244481","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundIn Australia, one-third of people ≥15 years perform regular resistance training and 90% of those do not meet current health guidelines. All age groups should engage in regular resistance exercise, to maintain strength and function.ObjectivesTo identify trends in powerlifting competition participation in Australia by sex and age group from 1968 to 2022, and to compare the strength of powerlifting competitors to population age- and sex-based normative values.MethodThe number of unique participants and total competition entries for each year were analysed using Australian powerlifting competition data. Subdomains of age and sex were investigated, and mean ± SD, frequency, range, and trend analyses reported. United Nations age classifications were used to identify age trends. Comparisons to population strength norms were explored descriptively.ResultsWe included 21,514 individual competitors from 1942 powerlifting competitions between 1968 and 2022. Exponential growth was seen in competition entries from 115 in 1981, to 759 in 1994, 1014 in 2011, and to 6803 in 2022, (R2 = 0.86). At first participation 18–25-year olds (51.1%) followed by ≥36 years (16%) were most represented. Strength comparison to available population norms demonstrates superior upper- (bench press [most competitors above 70th percentile) and lower-body (squat [majority rated ‘excellent’) strength.ConclusionsSuperior strength levels of powerlifters further the evidence base for this sport as an effective way to develop muscular strength, with low injury. We advocate for public health promotion and additional support for powerlifting as an underutilised community health tool.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
各年龄段的力量举运动参与情况:回顾性、纵向、人口分析以及与社区力量标准的比较
背景在澳大利亚,三分之一年龄≥15 岁的人定期进行阻力训练,其中 90% 的人不符合当前的健康准则。目标确定从 1968 年到 2022 年按性别和年龄组划分的澳大利亚举重比赛参与趋势,并将举重运动员的力量与基于人口年龄和性别的标准值进行比较。方法利用澳大利亚举重比赛数据分析每年的独立参赛者人数和参赛总数。对年龄和性别的子域进行了调查,并报告了平均值±标准差、频率、范围和趋势分析。联合国年龄分类用于确定年龄趋势。结果我们纳入了 1968 年至 2022 年间 1942 次举重比赛中的 21,514 名个人选手。参赛人数呈指数增长,从 1981 年的 115 人,到 1994 年的 759 人,2011 年的 1014 人,再到 2022 年的 6803 人(R2 = 0.86)。首次参赛者以 18-25 岁(51.1%)最多,其次是≥36 岁(16%)。与现有人口标准的力量比较显示,力量举运动员的上身(卧推[大多数参赛者超过第 70 百分位数])和下身(深蹲[大多数人被评为'优秀'])力量都很出色。我们主张促进公众健康,并为力量举提供更多支持,将其作为一种未得到充分利用的社区健康工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
15.80%
发文量
208
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching is a peer-reviewed, international, academic/professional journal, which aims to bridge the gap between coaching and sports science. The journal will integrate theory and practice in sports science, promote critical reflection of coaching practice, and evaluate commonly accepted beliefs about coaching effectiveness and performance enhancement. Open learning systems will be promoted in which: (a) sports science is made accessible to coaches, translating knowledge into working practice; and (b) the challenges faced by coaches are communicated to sports scientists. The vision of the journal is to support the development of a community in which: (i) sports scientists and coaches respect and learn from each other as they assist athletes to acquire skills by training safely and effectively, thereby enhancing their performance, maximizing their enjoyment of the sporting experience and facilitating character development; and (ii) scientific research is embraced in the quest to uncover, understand and develop the processes involved in sports coaching and elite performance.
期刊最新文献
Impact of coach education on coaching effectiveness in youth sport: A systematic review and meta-analysis Insights into coaching effectiveness: Perspectives from coaches and players in South African Women's Rugby A principled approach to skill acquisition in competitive surfing: Embracing representative learning design Effects of coaches' authentic leadership on athletes' training competition satisfaction: The mediating roles of psychological ownership and athlete engagement Training volume, intensity, and performance of world-class Chinese rowers prior to the 2019 world championships: A case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1