The challenge of change: understanding the role of habits in university students’ self-regulated learning

IF 3.6 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Higher Education Pub Date : 2024-04-10 DOI:10.1007/s10734-024-01199-w
Louise David, Felicitas Biwer, Rik Crutzen, Anique de Bruin
{"title":"The challenge of change: understanding the role of habits in university students’ self-regulated learning","authors":"Louise David, Felicitas Biwer, Rik Crutzen, Anique de Bruin","doi":"10.1007/s10734-024-01199-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Study habits drive a large portion of how university students study. Some of these habits are not effective in fostering academic achievement. To support students in breaking old, ineffective habits and forming new, effective study habits, an in-depth understanding of what students’ study habits look like and how they are both formed and broken is needed. Therefore, in this study, we explored these aspects among first-year university students in six focus group discussions (<i>N</i> = 29). Using a thematic analysis approach, we clustered the data in five themes: <i>Goals Matter</i>, <i>Balancing Perceived Efficiency and Effectiveness when Studying</i>, <i>Navigating Student Life: from Structured Routines to Self-Regulation Challenges</i>, <i>the Quest for Effective Habits</i> with <i>Trying to Break Free From the Screen</i> as subtheme, and <i>the Motivation Roller Coaster</i>. Findings suggest that students had different study habits depending on their goals. Students had quite accurate metacognitive knowledge about effective learning strategies for long-term learning, but often used other learning strategies they deemed most efficient in reaching their goals. Students indicated intentions to change, but did not prioritize change as their current habits enabled them to pass exams and change was not perceived as adding value. Fluctuations in motivation and transitioning to a self-regulated life hampered students’ intentions to form new and break old habits. Next to insights into factors affecting students’ behavioral change intentions, the findings suggest the importance of aligning assessment methods with life-long learning and supporting students in their long-term academic goal setting to prioritize study habits which target lasting learning to optimally foster their self-regulated learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":48383,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-024-01199-w","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study habits drive a large portion of how university students study. Some of these habits are not effective in fostering academic achievement. To support students in breaking old, ineffective habits and forming new, effective study habits, an in-depth understanding of what students’ study habits look like and how they are both formed and broken is needed. Therefore, in this study, we explored these aspects among first-year university students in six focus group discussions (N = 29). Using a thematic analysis approach, we clustered the data in five themes: Goals Matter, Balancing Perceived Efficiency and Effectiveness when Studying, Navigating Student Life: from Structured Routines to Self-Regulation Challenges, the Quest for Effective Habits with Trying to Break Free From the Screen as subtheme, and the Motivation Roller Coaster. Findings suggest that students had different study habits depending on their goals. Students had quite accurate metacognitive knowledge about effective learning strategies for long-term learning, but often used other learning strategies they deemed most efficient in reaching their goals. Students indicated intentions to change, but did not prioritize change as their current habits enabled them to pass exams and change was not perceived as adding value. Fluctuations in motivation and transitioning to a self-regulated life hampered students’ intentions to form new and break old habits. Next to insights into factors affecting students’ behavioral change intentions, the findings suggest the importance of aligning assessment methods with life-long learning and supporting students in their long-term academic goal setting to prioritize study habits which target lasting learning to optimally foster their self-regulated learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
变革的挑战:了解习惯在大学生自我调节学习中的作用
学习习惯在很大程度上影响着大学生的学习方式。其中有些习惯并不能有效提高学习成绩。为了帮助学生打破旧的、无效的习惯,形成新的、有效的学习习惯,我们需要深入了解学生的学习习惯是什么样的,以及它们是如何形成和打破的。因此,在本研究中,我们通过六次焦点小组讨论(人数=29)对大学一年级学生的这些方面进行了探讨。通过主题分析法,我们将数据归纳为五个主题:目标很重要、平衡学习时的效率和效果、驾驭学生生活:从结构化常规到自我调节挑战、追求有效习惯并尝试摆脱屏幕作为副主题,以及学习动机过山车。研究结果表明,学生的学习目标不同,学习习惯也不同。学生对长期学习的有效学习策略有相当准确的元认知知识,但经常使用他们认为最有效的其他学习策略来实现自己的目标。学生们表示有意改变,但并没有把改变放在首位,因为他们目前的习惯使他们能够通过考试,而改变并不被视为增加价值。学习动机的波动和向自我调节生活的过渡阻碍了学生形成新习惯和打破旧习惯的意愿。除了洞察影响学生行为改变意愿的因素外,研究结果还表明,重要的是要将评估方法与终身学习结合起来,并支持学生制定长期的学业目标,优先考虑以持久学习为目标的学习习惯,以最佳方式促进他们的自我调节学习。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education
Higher Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
10.70
自引率
12.00%
发文量
160
期刊介绍: Higher Education is recognised as the leading international journal of Higher Education studies, publishing twelve separate numbers each year. Since its establishment in 1972, Higher Education has followed educational developments throughout the world in universities, polytechnics, colleges, and vocational and education institutions. It has actively endeavoured to report on developments in both public and private Higher Education sectors. Contributions have come from leading scholars from different countries while articles have tackled the problems of teachers as well as students, and of planners as well as administrators. While each Higher Education system has its own distinctive features, common problems and issues are shared internationally by researchers, teachers and institutional leaders. Higher Education offers opportunities for exchange of research results, experience and insights, and provides a forum for ongoing discussion between experts. Higher Education publishes authoritative overview articles, comparative studies and analyses of particular problems or issues. All contributions are peer reviewed.
期刊最新文献
“Writing for English-medium publication is a journey to nowhere — no route and no tools”: Russian academics’ perceptions of the existing publication support The enigma of collegiality: collegiality frames and institutional logics in US higher education Navigating public goods: Chilean public universities and their transformative role in Latin America Exploring perceptions of public good(s), government, and global contributions in Japanese higher education: a phenomenographic approach The importance of international and national publications for promotion and the impact of recruitment policies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1