Red filter meibography by smartphones in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction: a validity and reliability study

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001266
Gisela Haza Anissa, Rina La Distia Nora, Syska Widyawati, Ratna Sitompul, Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf, Aria Kekalih
{"title":"Red filter meibography by smartphones in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction: a validity and reliability study","authors":"Gisela Haza Anissa, Rina La Distia Nora, Syska Widyawati, Ratna Sitompul, Prasandhya Astagiri Yusuf, Aria Kekalih","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective The objective of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the red filter meibography by smartphone compared with infrared in assessing meibomian gland drop-out. Methods and analysis An analytical cross-sectional study was done with a total of 35 subjects (68 eyes) with suspected MGD based on symptoms and lid morphological abnormalities. Meibomian glands were photographed using two smartphones (Samsung S9 and iPhone XR) on a slit-lamp with added red filter. Images were assessed subjectively using meiboscore by the two raters and drop-out percentages were assessed by ImageJ. Results There was no agreement in meiboscore and a minimal level of agreement in drop-out percentages between red filter meibography and infrared. Inter-rater reliability showed no agreement between two raters. Intra-rater reliability demonstrated weak agreement in rater 1 and no agreement in rater 2. Conclusion Validity of the red filter meibography technique by smartphones is not yet satisfactory in evaluating drop-out. Further improvement on qualities of images must be done and research on subjective assessment was deemed necessary due to poor results of intrarater and inter-rater reliability. No data are available.","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study is to determine the validity and reliability of the red filter meibography by smartphone compared with infrared in assessing meibomian gland drop-out. Methods and analysis An analytical cross-sectional study was done with a total of 35 subjects (68 eyes) with suspected MGD based on symptoms and lid morphological abnormalities. Meibomian glands were photographed using two smartphones (Samsung S9 and iPhone XR) on a slit-lamp with added red filter. Images were assessed subjectively using meiboscore by the two raters and drop-out percentages were assessed by ImageJ. Results There was no agreement in meiboscore and a minimal level of agreement in drop-out percentages between red filter meibography and infrared. Inter-rater reliability showed no agreement between two raters. Intra-rater reliability demonstrated weak agreement in rater 1 and no agreement in rater 2. Conclusion Validity of the red filter meibography technique by smartphones is not yet satisfactory in evaluating drop-out. Further improvement on qualities of images must be done and research on subjective assessment was deemed necessary due to poor results of intrarater and inter-rater reliability. No data are available.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过智能手机对睑板腺功能障碍患者进行红色滤光片睑板腺造影:有效性和可靠性研究
目的 本研究旨在确定在评估睑板腺脱落方面,与红外线相比,智能手机红色滤镜睑板腺造影的有效性和可靠性。方法和分析 对根据症状和眼睑形态异常怀疑患有睑板腺肥大的 35 名受试者(68 只眼睛)进行了横断面分析研究。使用两部智能手机(三星 S9 和 iPhone XR)在加有红色滤镜的裂隙灯上拍摄睑板腺。两位评定者使用meiboscore对图像进行主观评估,并使用ImageJ对丢失百分比进行评估。结果 红色滤光片肉眼可见光成像与红外线肉眼可见光成像之间在meiboscore上没有一致性,在漏检百分比上的一致性极低。评分者之间的可靠性显示两位评分者之间没有一致性。评分者内部信度显示,评分者 1 的一致性较弱,评分者 2 则无一致性。结论 智能手机红色滤光片肉眼可见光成像技术在评估脱落方面的有效性尚不令人满意。由于评分者内部和评分者之间的可靠性较差,必须进一步提高图像质量,并对主观评估进行研究。目前尚无相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Efficacy and Safety of Prophylactic Agents in Prevention of Retinopathy of Prematurity: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomised Controlled rials. Endoplasmic reticulum protein TXNDC5 modulates thyroid eye disease TGF-β1-induced myofibroblast transdifferentiation. Zoledronic acid as adjuvant therapy in neovascular age-related macular degeneration: a randomised controlled pilot study. Analysis of biofluid metabolomic profiles to the discovery of biomarkers in age-related macular degeneration. Novel electroretinography devices to detect hydroxychloroquine retinopathy: study protocol for a diagnostic accuracy and feasibility study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1