Characteristics of beta parapapillary atrophy in primary angle-closure suspect

IF 2 Q2 OPHTHALMOLOGY BMJ Open Ophthalmology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001529
Fei Xiang, Ye Zhang, Qing Zhang, Xiaohua Pan, Hui Feng, Meijuan Zhang, Caixia Li, Qianqian Ji, Zhi Li, Shuning Li
{"title":"Characteristics of beta parapapillary atrophy in primary angle-closure suspect","authors":"Fei Xiang, Ye Zhang, Qing Zhang, Xiaohua Pan, Hui Feng, Meijuan Zhang, Caixia Li, Qianqian Ji, Zhi Li, Shuning Li","doi":"10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001529","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To investigate the characteristics of beta parapapillary atrophy (β-PPA) in patients with primary angle-closure suspect (PACS). Methods and analysis In total, 215 and 259 eyes with PACS and non-PACS (NPACS), respectively, were enrolled in this observational, cross-sectional study. Stereoscopic fundus and optical coherence tomography images were used to characterise β-PPA; the former was also used to measure the major β-PPA parameters. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors correlated with the presence of β-PPA and with β-PPA parameters. Results The β-PPA occurrence rates were 48.80% and 44.40% in the PACS and NPACS groups, respectively, with no significant difference between groups. Compared with that in the NPACS group, the β-PPA area was significantly larger (p=0.005) in the PACS group, but the angular extent and maximum radial length did not differ between groups (p=0.110 and 0.657, respectively) after adjusting for age and axial length. The presence of β-PPA was associated with older age (OR 1.057, 95% CI 1.028 to 1.088, p<0.001) and larger disc area (OR 1.716, 95% CI 1.170 to 2.517, p=0.006). A larger β-PPA area was associated with older age (p=0.014), greater vertical cup-to-disc ratio (p=0.028), larger disc area (p<0.001) and PACS diagnosis (p=0.035). Conclusion 48.80% of participants with PACS had β-PPA, which is slightly larger than NPACS. The area of β-PPA was larger in PACS, while the angular extent and maximum radial length did not differ between groups. Data are available on reasonable request.","PeriodicalId":9286,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","volume":"162 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjophth-2023-001529","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To investigate the characteristics of beta parapapillary atrophy (β-PPA) in patients with primary angle-closure suspect (PACS). Methods and analysis In total, 215 and 259 eyes with PACS and non-PACS (NPACS), respectively, were enrolled in this observational, cross-sectional study. Stereoscopic fundus and optical coherence tomography images were used to characterise β-PPA; the former was also used to measure the major β-PPA parameters. Univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors correlated with the presence of β-PPA and with β-PPA parameters. Results The β-PPA occurrence rates were 48.80% and 44.40% in the PACS and NPACS groups, respectively, with no significant difference between groups. Compared with that in the NPACS group, the β-PPA area was significantly larger (p=0.005) in the PACS group, but the angular extent and maximum radial length did not differ between groups (p=0.110 and 0.657, respectively) after adjusting for age and axial length. The presence of β-PPA was associated with older age (OR 1.057, 95% CI 1.028 to 1.088, p<0.001) and larger disc area (OR 1.716, 95% CI 1.170 to 2.517, p=0.006). A larger β-PPA area was associated with older age (p=0.014), greater vertical cup-to-disc ratio (p=0.028), larger disc area (p<0.001) and PACS diagnosis (p=0.035). Conclusion 48.80% of participants with PACS had β-PPA, which is slightly larger than NPACS. The area of β-PPA was larger in PACS, while the angular extent and maximum radial length did not differ between groups. Data are available on reasonable request.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
原发性闭角疑似病例副乳头萎缩的特征
目的 探讨原发性闭角怀疑症(PACS)患者视网膜乳头旁萎缩(β-PPA)的特征。方法和分析 本观察性横断面研究共纳入了 215 和 259 只分别患有 PACS 和非 PACS(NPACS)的眼睛。研究人员使用立体眼底和光学相干断层扫描图像来描述 β-PPA 的特征;前者还用于测量 β-PPA 的主要参数。采用单变量和多元逻辑回归分析来确定与是否存在 β-PPA 以及与 β-PPA 参数相关的因素。结果 PACS 组和 NPACS 组的β-PPA 发生率分别为 48.80% 和 44.40%,组间差异无显著性。与 NPACS 组相比,PACS 组的β-PPA 面积明显更大(P=0.005),但在调整年龄和轴长后,β-PPA 的角度范围和最大桡骨长度在组间无差异(P=0.110 和 0.657)。β-PPA的存在与年龄较大(OR 1.057,95% CI 1.028 至 1.088,p<0.001)和椎间盘面积较大(OR 1.716,95% CI 1.170 至 2.517,p=0.006)有关。β-PPA面积越大与年龄越大(p=0.014)、垂直杯盘比越大(p=0.028)、椎间盘面积越大(p<0.001)和PACS诊断(p=0.035)相关。结论 48.80% 的 PACS 患者患有 β-PPA,略大于 NPACS。PACS 患者的 β-PPA 面积更大,而角度范围和最大径向长度在各组之间没有差异。如有合理要求,可提供相关数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Ophthalmology
BMJ Open Ophthalmology OPHTHALMOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
104
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effect of ethnicity and other sociodemographic factors on attendance at ophthalmology appointments following referral from a Diabetic Eye Screening Programme: a retrospective cohort study. Comparative evaluation of funduscopy, PCR and serology in the diagnosis of ocular toxoplasmosis at ECWA Eye Hospital, Kano. Deep learning-based anterior segment identification and parameter assessment of primary angle closure disease in ultrasound biomicroscopy images. Switching to faricimab from the current anti-VEGF therapy: evidence-based expert recommendations. Deep learning-based assessment of missense variants in the COG4 gene presented with bilateral congenital cataract.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1