Sex-based differences in neck selectivity in total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system

Tomonori Shigemura, Koya Kamikawa, Yohei Yamamoto, Yasuaki Murata
{"title":"Sex-based differences in neck selectivity in total hip arthroplasty using a modular femoral neck system","authors":"Tomonori Shigemura, Koya Kamikawa, Yohei Yamamoto, Yasuaki Murata","doi":"10.1177/03913988241243021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Dislocation is a major complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The modular femoral neck system provides practical advantages by allowing adjustment of neck version and length in the presence of intraoperative instability. Anatomical studies have identified morphological differences in the hip joint between men and women. Despite sex-based differences in hip morphology, it remains unclear whether such differences affect neck selectivity in THA using a modular neck system and whether this approach achieves anatomical reconstruction, thereby reducing complications such as dislocation. This study aimed to investigate gender differences in neck selectivity in THA with the modular neck system and assess the clinical impact of the modular neck system.Methods:A total of 163 THAs using a modular neck system were included in this study. Data on the type of modular neck and intraoperative range of motion (ROM) were retrieved from patient records. Pre- and post-operative leg length differences (LLD) were examined as part of the radiographic assessment. Dislocation was investigated as a postoperative complication.Results:Neck selectivity did not significantly differ between men and women. The comparison of pre- and post-operative LLD revealed a tendency for varus necks to improve LLD more than version-controlled necks. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between intraoperative ROM and neck selectivity, or postoperative dislocation and neck selectivity.Conclusions:This study on THA with a modular neck system provided valuable insights into sex-based differences in neck selectivity and highlighted the potential benefits of the modular neck system in addressing LLD and preventing postoperative dislocation.","PeriodicalId":519226,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Artificial Organs","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Artificial Organs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/03913988241243021","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:Dislocation is a major complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). The modular femoral neck system provides practical advantages by allowing adjustment of neck version and length in the presence of intraoperative instability. Anatomical studies have identified morphological differences in the hip joint between men and women. Despite sex-based differences in hip morphology, it remains unclear whether such differences affect neck selectivity in THA using a modular neck system and whether this approach achieves anatomical reconstruction, thereby reducing complications such as dislocation. This study aimed to investigate gender differences in neck selectivity in THA with the modular neck system and assess the clinical impact of the modular neck system.Methods:A total of 163 THAs using a modular neck system were included in this study. Data on the type of modular neck and intraoperative range of motion (ROM) were retrieved from patient records. Pre- and post-operative leg length differences (LLD) were examined as part of the radiographic assessment. Dislocation was investigated as a postoperative complication.Results:Neck selectivity did not significantly differ between men and women. The comparison of pre- and post-operative LLD revealed a tendency for varus necks to improve LLD more than version-controlled necks. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between intraoperative ROM and neck selectivity, or postoperative dislocation and neck selectivity.Conclusions:This study on THA with a modular neck system provided valuable insights into sex-based differences in neck selectivity and highlighted the potential benefits of the modular neck system in addressing LLD and preventing postoperative dislocation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用模块化股骨颈系统进行全髋关节置换术时股骨颈选择性的性别差异
背景:脱位是全髋关节置换术(THA)的主要并发症。模块化股骨颈系统具有实用优势,可在术中出现不稳定时调整股骨颈的形状和长度。解剖学研究发现了男女髋关节的形态差异。尽管髋关节形态存在性别差异,但这种差异是否会影响使用模块化股骨颈系统进行全髋关节置换术时的股骨颈选择性,以及这种方法是否能实现解剖重建,从而减少脱位等并发症,目前仍不清楚。本研究旨在调查使用模块化颈部系统的 THA 中颈部选择性的性别差异,并评估模块化颈部系统的临床影响。从患者病历中获取了有关模块化颈部和术中活动范围(ROM)的数据。作为放射学评估的一部分,对术前和术后的腿长差异(LLD)进行了检查。结果:颈部选择性在男性和女性之间没有明显差异。术前和术后LLD的比较显示,变曲颈部比畸形控制颈部更容易改善LLD。此外,术中ROM与颈部选择性、术后脱位与颈部选择性之间没有发现明显的相关性。结论:这项关于使用模块化颈部系统的THA的研究为了解颈部选择性的性别差异提供了有价值的见解,并强调了模块化颈部系统在解决LLD问题和预防术后脱位方面的潜在优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of extracorporeal hemadsorption on mortality in critically ill COVID-19 patients in the intensive care unit Silk fibroin sponge impregnated with fish bone collagen: A promising wound healing scaffold and skin tissue regeneration Premorbid functional status in patients requiring veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation after cardiac surgery Enhancing cutaneous wound healing: A study on the beneficial effects of nano-gelatin scaffold in rat models Do medical devices contribute to sustainability? Environmental, societal and governance aspects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1