Effect of cotton population density on lint yield and fiber quality

IF 1.3 Q3 AGRONOMY Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1002/agg2.20497
Emi Kimura, Curtis Adams, Paul DeLaune, Jonathan Ramirez, Santanu Thapa
{"title":"Effect of cotton population density on lint yield and fiber quality","authors":"Emi Kimura,&nbsp;Curtis Adams,&nbsp;Paul DeLaune,&nbsp;Jonathan Ramirez,&nbsp;Santanu Thapa","doi":"10.1002/agg2.20497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Commercial cultivars with advanced technology have reduced pest pressures, while greater seed costs have increased total production cost. Limited information is available on the optimal final population density (PD) for the commercially available cotton (<i>Gossypium hirsutum</i> L.) cultivars with advanced technologies in water-scarce environments. Therefore, our objectives were to examine the effects of PD on cotton growth and development, lint yield, fiber quality, and net return. A 2-year study was conducted to test four PDs (low, medium, high, and very high) in deficit-irrigated and dryland conditions at Chillicothe, TX. Final PD at 12 days after planting were 54,078, 109,563, 124,037, and 151,377 plant ha<sup>−1</sup> in irrigated and 67,346, 115,335, 116,397, and 145,432 plant ha<sup>−1</sup> in dryland trials. Maturity was delayed in the low PD early in the season; however, the differences on maturity ceased toward the end of the season. No statistical differences were observed on lint yield and fiber quality among treatments in irrigated and dryland trials. Average lint yields were 1199 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in irrigated and 796 kg ha<sup>−1</sup> in dryland trial. Net returns were similar among all PD in the irrigated trial, while low PD had significantly higher net-return than very high PD in the dryland trial. The higher net return at the low PD was due to the lower seed cost associated with a low seeding rate. In the water-scarce environment, final plant density of 54,078 plant ha<sup>−1</sup> in deficit irrigation and 67,346 plant ha<sup>−1</sup> in dryland produced optimal yield and net return as compared to higher PD examined.</p>","PeriodicalId":7567,"journal":{"name":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","volume":"7 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/agg2.20497","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/agg2.20497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Commercial cultivars with advanced technology have reduced pest pressures, while greater seed costs have increased total production cost. Limited information is available on the optimal final population density (PD) for the commercially available cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) cultivars with advanced technologies in water-scarce environments. Therefore, our objectives were to examine the effects of PD on cotton growth and development, lint yield, fiber quality, and net return. A 2-year study was conducted to test four PDs (low, medium, high, and very high) in deficit-irrigated and dryland conditions at Chillicothe, TX. Final PD at 12 days after planting were 54,078, 109,563, 124,037, and 151,377 plant ha−1 in irrigated and 67,346, 115,335, 116,397, and 145,432 plant ha−1 in dryland trials. Maturity was delayed in the low PD early in the season; however, the differences on maturity ceased toward the end of the season. No statistical differences were observed on lint yield and fiber quality among treatments in irrigated and dryland trials. Average lint yields were 1199 kg ha−1 in irrigated and 796 kg ha−1 in dryland trial. Net returns were similar among all PD in the irrigated trial, while low PD had significantly higher net-return than very high PD in the dryland trial. The higher net return at the low PD was due to the lower seed cost associated with a low seeding rate. In the water-scarce environment, final plant density of 54,078 plant ha−1 in deficit irrigation and 67,346 plant ha−1 in dryland produced optimal yield and net return as compared to higher PD examined.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
棉花种群密度对皮棉产量和纤维质量的影响
采用先进技术的商业栽培品种减轻了虫害压力,而种子成本的增加却增加了总生产成本。关于在缺水环境中采用先进技术的商业化棉花(Gossypium hirsutum L.)栽培品种的最佳最终群体密度(PD),目前可用的信息有限。因此,我们的目标是研究种植密度对棉花生长发育、皮棉产量、纤维质量和净收益的影响。我们进行了一项为期两年的研究,在德克萨斯州 Chillicothe 的缺水灌溉和旱地条件下测试了四种 PD(低、中、高和极高)。播种后 12 天,灌溉试验的最终亩产量分别为 54,078 株/公顷、109,563 株/公顷、124,037 株/公顷和 151,377 株/公顷,旱地试验的最终亩产量分别为 67,346 株/公顷、115,335 株/公顷、116,397 株/公顷和 145,432 株/公顷。低PD的成熟期在试验季初期推迟,但成熟期的差异在试验季末期消失。在灌溉试验和旱地试验中,各处理的皮棉产量和纤维质量没有统计学差异。灌溉试验和旱地试验的平均皮棉产量分别为 1199 千克/公顷和 796 千克/公顷。在灌溉试验中,所有 PD 的净收益相似,而在旱地试验中,低 PD 的净收益明显高于极高 PD。低旱耕地净收益较高的原因是播种率低,种子成本较低。在缺水环境中,亏缺灌溉的最终植株密度为 54,078 株/公顷-1,旱地的最终植株密度为 67,346 株/公顷-1,与高 PD 相比,产量和净收益均达到最佳。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment
Agrosystems, Geosciences & Environment Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
80
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Exploration of barley (Hordeum vulgareL.) accessions for yield and yield components from diverse agro-ecological zones of Ethiopia Genotypic variation in nitrogen fixation characteristics in faba bean (Vicia faba L.) under contrasting phosphorus fertilizer regimes Limestone reaction in sandy soil: Rate effects, limestone type, moisture regime, and time Irrigation frequency effects on Prizm zoysiagrass establishment from sprigs Evaluating corn, tall fescue and canola growth on sediments dredged from the Lorain Harbor
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1