Fertility related knowledge, attitudes, and decision-making among gender diverse youth - A narrative review

IF 3.7 3区 生物学 Q1 DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY Reproduction Pub Date : 2024-04-01 DOI:10.1530/rep-24-0032
Hayley Baines, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Diane Chen, Leena Nahata
{"title":"Fertility related knowledge, attitudes, and decision-making among gender diverse youth - A narrative review","authors":"Hayley Baines, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Diane Chen, Leena Nahata","doi":"10.1530/rep-24-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The number of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth seeking care continues to increase, necessitating comprehensive counseling about potential long-term effects of gender-affirming medical interventions on fertility. The objective of this narrative review was to examine fertility related knowledge, attitudes, and decision making (including factors influencing decisions, decision regret, and decision tools) among TGD youth. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo and Google Scholar for original, peer reviewed research investigating TGD youth attitudes and knowledge of fertility and fertility preservation, perspectives on fertility counseling and fertility preservation decision making, as well as fertility related decision tools. We reviewed 106 studies; eight were included in this narrative review. Four studies assessed TGD youth knowledge and attitudes of fertility and fertility preservation, three examined perspectives on fertility counseling and fertility preservation decision making, and three discussed development of decision tools. Key findings were that: 1) many TGD youth are aware of potential fertility related impacts of gender-affirming treatments but there are still unmet informational needs, 2) some TGD youth report an interest in future biological parenthood, and of those who are not currently interested in biological parenthood, many acknowledge their desires may change over time, 3) ongoing discussions about fertility and fertility preservation are critical, and 4) decision tools are in development. In conclusion, TGD youth and their caregivers should receive ongoing, comprehensive fertility counseling, and decision tools may be helpful to facilitate these discussions and decisions in each youth’s gender-affirming care journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":21127,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-24-0032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The number of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth seeking care continues to increase, necessitating comprehensive counseling about potential long-term effects of gender-affirming medical interventions on fertility. The objective of this narrative review was to examine fertility related knowledge, attitudes, and decision making (including factors influencing decisions, decision regret, and decision tools) among TGD youth. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo and Google Scholar for original, peer reviewed research investigating TGD youth attitudes and knowledge of fertility and fertility preservation, perspectives on fertility counseling and fertility preservation decision making, as well as fertility related decision tools. We reviewed 106 studies; eight were included in this narrative review. Four studies assessed TGD youth knowledge and attitudes of fertility and fertility preservation, three examined perspectives on fertility counseling and fertility preservation decision making, and three discussed development of decision tools. Key findings were that: 1) many TGD youth are aware of potential fertility related impacts of gender-affirming treatments but there are still unmet informational needs, 2) some TGD youth report an interest in future biological parenthood, and of those who are not currently interested in biological parenthood, many acknowledge their desires may change over time, 3) ongoing discussions about fertility and fertility preservation are critical, and 4) decision tools are in development. In conclusion, TGD youth and their caregivers should receive ongoing, comprehensive fertility counseling, and decision tools may be helpful to facilitate these discussions and decisions in each youth’s gender-affirming care journey.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同性别青年的生育相关知识、态度和决策--叙述性综述
寻求治疗的变性和性别多元化(TGD)青年人数持续增加,因此有必要就性别确认医疗干预对生育的潜在长期影响提供全面咨询。本叙述性综述旨在研究变性和性别多元化青年对生育的相关知识、态度和决策(包括影响决策的因素、决策遗憾和决策工具)。我们在 PubMed、PsycInfo 和 Google Scholar 上搜索了同行评审的原创研究,这些研究调查了 TGD 青年对生育和生育保护的态度和知识、对生育咨询和生育保护决策的看法,以及与生育相关的决策工具。我们审查了 106 项研究,其中 8 项被纳入本叙述性综述。四项研究评估了 TGD 青少年对生育和生育保护的认识和态度,三项研究探讨了生育咨询和生育保护决策的观点,三项研究讨论了决策工具的开发。主要发现有1)许多 TGD 青年意识到性别确认治疗对生育的潜在影响,但仍有信息需求未得到满足;2)一些 TGD 青年表示对未来生儿育女感兴趣,而在那些目前对生儿育女不感兴趣的人中,许多人承认他们的愿望可能会随着时间的推移而改变;3)持续进行有关生育和生育力保存的讨论至关重要;4)决策工具正在开发中。总之,TGD 青少年及其照顾者应接受持续、全面的生育咨询,决策工具可能有助于在每个青少年的性别确认护理过程中促进这些讨论和决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Reproduction
Reproduction 生物-发育生物学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.60%
发文量
199
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Reproduction is the official journal of the Society of Reproduction and Fertility (SRF). It was formed in 2001 when the Society merged its two journals, the Journal of Reproduction and Fertility and Reviews of Reproduction. Reproduction publishes original research articles and topical reviews on the subject of reproductive and developmental biology, and reproductive medicine. The journal will consider publication of high-quality meta-analyses; these should be submitted to the research papers category. The journal considers studies in humans and all animal species, and will publish clinical studies if they advance our understanding of the underlying causes and/or mechanisms of disease. Scientific excellence and broad interest to our readership are the most important criteria during the peer review process. The journal publishes articles that make a clear advance in the field, whether of mechanistic, descriptive or technical focus. Articles that substantiate new or controversial reports are welcomed if they are noteworthy and advance the field. Topics include, but are not limited to, reproductive immunology, reproductive toxicology, stem cells, environmental effects on reproductive potential and health (eg obesity), extracellular vesicles, fertility preservation and epigenetic effects on reproductive and developmental processes.
期刊最新文献
REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH IN TRANS AND GENDER-DIVERSE PATIENTS: Gonadal tissue cryopreservation in transgender and gender-diverse people. IMPACT OF REAL-LIFE ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURES ON REPRODUCTION: A contemporary review of machine learning to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes from pharmaceuticals, including DDIs. O-GlcNAc participates in the meiosis of aging oocytes by mediating mitochondrial function. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH IN TRANS AND GENDER-DIVERSE PATIENTS: Trauma-informed reproductive care for transgender and nonbinary people. SON controls mouse early embryonic development by regulating RNA splicing and histone methylation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1