Hayley Baines, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Diane Chen, Leena Nahata
{"title":"Fertility related knowledge, attitudes, and decision-making among gender diverse youth - A narrative review","authors":"Hayley Baines, Gwendolyn P Quinn, Diane Chen, Leena Nahata","doi":"10.1530/rep-24-0032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The number of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth seeking care continues to increase, necessitating comprehensive counseling about potential long-term effects of gender-affirming medical interventions on fertility. The objective of this narrative review was to examine fertility related knowledge, attitudes, and decision making (including factors influencing decisions, decision regret, and decision tools) among TGD youth. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo and Google Scholar for original, peer reviewed research investigating TGD youth attitudes and knowledge of fertility and fertility preservation, perspectives on fertility counseling and fertility preservation decision making, as well as fertility related decision tools. We reviewed 106 studies; eight were included in this narrative review. Four studies assessed TGD youth knowledge and attitudes of fertility and fertility preservation, three examined perspectives on fertility counseling and fertility preservation decision making, and three discussed development of decision tools. Key findings were that: 1) many TGD youth are aware of potential fertility related impacts of gender-affirming treatments but there are still unmet informational needs, 2) some TGD youth report an interest in future biological parenthood, and of those who are not currently interested in biological parenthood, many acknowledge their desires may change over time, 3) ongoing discussions about fertility and fertility preservation are critical, and 4) decision tools are in development. In conclusion, TGD youth and their caregivers should receive ongoing, comprehensive fertility counseling, and decision tools may be helpful to facilitate these discussions and decisions in each youth’s gender-affirming care journey.</p>","PeriodicalId":21127,"journal":{"name":"Reproduction","volume":"49 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Reproduction","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1530/rep-24-0032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The number of transgender and gender diverse (TGD) youth seeking care continues to increase, necessitating comprehensive counseling about potential long-term effects of gender-affirming medical interventions on fertility. The objective of this narrative review was to examine fertility related knowledge, attitudes, and decision making (including factors influencing decisions, decision regret, and decision tools) among TGD youth. We searched PubMed, PsycInfo and Google Scholar for original, peer reviewed research investigating TGD youth attitudes and knowledge of fertility and fertility preservation, perspectives on fertility counseling and fertility preservation decision making, as well as fertility related decision tools. We reviewed 106 studies; eight were included in this narrative review. Four studies assessed TGD youth knowledge and attitudes of fertility and fertility preservation, three examined perspectives on fertility counseling and fertility preservation decision making, and three discussed development of decision tools. Key findings were that: 1) many TGD youth are aware of potential fertility related impacts of gender-affirming treatments but there are still unmet informational needs, 2) some TGD youth report an interest in future biological parenthood, and of those who are not currently interested in biological parenthood, many acknowledge their desires may change over time, 3) ongoing discussions about fertility and fertility preservation are critical, and 4) decision tools are in development. In conclusion, TGD youth and their caregivers should receive ongoing, comprehensive fertility counseling, and decision tools may be helpful to facilitate these discussions and decisions in each youth’s gender-affirming care journey.
期刊介绍:
Reproduction is the official journal of the Society of Reproduction and Fertility (SRF). It was formed in 2001 when the Society merged its two journals, the Journal of Reproduction and Fertility and Reviews of Reproduction.
Reproduction publishes original research articles and topical reviews on the subject of reproductive and developmental biology, and reproductive medicine. The journal will consider publication of high-quality meta-analyses; these should be submitted to the research papers category. The journal considers studies in humans and all animal species, and will publish clinical studies if they advance our understanding of the underlying causes and/or mechanisms of disease.
Scientific excellence and broad interest to our readership are the most important criteria during the peer review process. The journal publishes articles that make a clear advance in the field, whether of mechanistic, descriptive or technical focus. Articles that substantiate new or controversial reports are welcomed if they are noteworthy and advance the field. Topics include, but are not limited to, reproductive immunology, reproductive toxicology, stem cells, environmental effects on reproductive potential and health (eg obesity), extracellular vesicles, fertility preservation and epigenetic effects on reproductive and developmental processes.