An Analysis of Healthcare Usage & Place of Death in England for All Adults Who Died in 2021/22

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-16 DOI:10.1177/10499091241247183
Justine Wiltshire, Jacqueline Grout, Mike Krotosky, Peter Gerry, Peter Ashcroft, Rachael White, Ash Lillis, Adrienne Betteley, Ollie Minton
{"title":"An Analysis of Healthcare Usage & Place of Death in England for All Adults Who Died in 2021/22","authors":"Justine Wiltshire, Jacqueline Grout, Mike Krotosky, Peter Gerry, Peter Ashcroft, Rachael White, Ash Lillis, Adrienne Betteley, Ollie Minton","doi":"10.1177/10499091241247183","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectiveWe wanted to examine the healthcare use and non-elective activity in the UK population of expected deaths over an 1-year period to highlight and examine the reasons for variation. We did this to identify areas to focus interventions or resources on to reduce unnecessary emergency care use at the end of life.Methods and AnalysisWe assembled a data set of approximately 400 000 adults who died in England in the financial year 2021/22 (April 2021-March 2022). Any adults classified as a ‘sudden death’ were excluded. We used available data to ensure outcome measures were relevant used expert consensus to agree what to examine. We recorded place of death and examined urgent care in terms of admissions in the last year and 90 days of life. We also used recorded hospital care days as elective and non-elective usage.ResultsThere were over 400 000 decedents included in our regression models. Close to half died in hospital (44%). Three-quarters (77%) had at least one day of unplanned hospital care in the 90 days before they died, and half (56%) had at least one day of planned hospital care.ConclusionReliance on urgent care for those approaching end-of-life may indicate poor care planning and integration of services. A relatively modest increase in the amount of community care a person receives at end-of-life can substantially reduce the likelihood of dying in hospital. Those with a cancer cause of death are far less likely to die in hospital.","PeriodicalId":50810,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241247183","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectiveWe wanted to examine the healthcare use and non-elective activity in the UK population of expected deaths over an 1-year period to highlight and examine the reasons for variation. We did this to identify areas to focus interventions or resources on to reduce unnecessary emergency care use at the end of life.Methods and AnalysisWe assembled a data set of approximately 400 000 adults who died in England in the financial year 2021/22 (April 2021-March 2022). Any adults classified as a ‘sudden death’ were excluded. We used available data to ensure outcome measures were relevant used expert consensus to agree what to examine. We recorded place of death and examined urgent care in terms of admissions in the last year and 90 days of life. We also used recorded hospital care days as elective and non-elective usage.ResultsThere were over 400 000 decedents included in our regression models. Close to half died in hospital (44%). Three-quarters (77%) had at least one day of unplanned hospital care in the 90 days before they died, and half (56%) had at least one day of planned hospital care.ConclusionReliance on urgent care for those approaching end-of-life may indicate poor care planning and integration of services. A relatively modest increase in the amount of community care a person receives at end-of-life can substantially reduce the likelihood of dying in hospital. Those with a cancer cause of death are far less likely to die in hospital.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对英格兰 2021/22 年度死亡的所有成年人的医疗保健使用情况和死亡地点的分析
目标我们希望研究英国预期死亡人口在一年内的医疗保健使用情况和非选择性活动,以突出和研究差异的原因。我们这样做是为了确定应重点干预的领域或资源,以减少生命末期不必要的急诊护理使用。方法与分析我们收集了 2021/22 财政年度(2021 年 4 月至 2022 年 3 月)在英格兰死亡的约 40 万成年人的数据集。任何被归类为 "猝死 "的成人都不包括在内。我们使用现有数据来确保结果测量的相关性,并通过专家共识来商定检查内容。我们记录了死亡地点,并根据生命最后一年和 90 天的入院情况对紧急护理进行了检查。我们还使用记录的医院护理天数作为选择性和非选择性使用。近一半的人死于医院(44%)。四分之三的患者(77%)在去世前的 90 天内至少接受过一天的非计划性医院护理,而一半的患者(56%)至少接受过一天的计划性医院护理。相对而言,增加临终患者接受社区护理的次数可以大大降低其死于医院的可能性。以癌症为死因的人死于医院的可能性要小得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine
American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
169
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: American Journal of Hospice & Palliative Medicine (AJHPM) is a peer-reviewed journal, published eight times a year. In 30 years of publication, AJHPM has highlighted the interdisciplinary team approach to hospice and palliative medicine as related to the care of the patient and family. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
期刊最新文献
Pain Outcomes Among Medical Centers With High vs Low Specialist Palliative Care Reach Among People With Heart Failure. Exploring the Perceptions of Families and Nurses After Signing a Do-Not-Resuscitate Order for Patients in Respiratory Care Wards Differences in Timely Goals of Care Discussions in Nursing Homes Among Black Residents A Way Forward for Comprehensive Cancer Caregiver Support Development of a Hospice Perceptions Instrument for Diverse Patients and Families: Establishing Content and Face Validity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1