Lorenz Fries on the defense of Avicenna, the prince of physicians: Addressed to the medics of Germany (1530)

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q1 ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY Clinical Anatomy Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1002/ca.24169
Mohammadali M. Shoja, Tara Tritsch, R. Shane Tubbs
{"title":"Lorenz Fries on the defense of Avicenna, the prince of physicians: Addressed to the medics of Germany (1530)","authors":"Mohammadali M. Shoja,&nbsp;Tara Tritsch,&nbsp;R. Shane Tubbs","doi":"10.1002/ca.24169","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>During the 14th century CE, a pivotal shift took place in the world of medicine as its epicenter transitioned from the Middle East to Europe. The emergence of the European Renaissance sparked skepticism regarding the significance of Avicenna's contributions to the advancement of medicine. This paper explores how the rise of secularization and the Renaissance in Europe marked significant cultural transformations, fostering the spread of literacy. These societal shifts influenced the trajectory of medical thought, and Avicenna's “Canon of Medicine” received both praise and condemnation amidst the evolving intellectual landscape. In this context, Lorenz Fries composed his “Defense of Avicenna,” a testament to his profound admiration for Avicenna's legacy. This paper presents an English translation of Fries' 1530 work, and introduces Fries and Avicenna's “Canon,” contextualizing Fries' defense within the broader rejection of Arab-language medical texts in the 16th century. It also explores Avicenna's influence on European medicine and anatomy during the Renaissance and highlights the enduring relevance of his contributions to the annals of science. Fries' defense underscores Avicenna's methodological acumen and emphasizes the importance of a robust theoretical foundation in medical practice. Avicenna's integration of Aristotelianism with Platonism highlighted the necessity of a rigorous method informed by theory in medical analysis. Fries' defense remains relevant today, particularly in advocating for systematic medical analysis against subjective approaches. Avicenna's medical philosophy seems nested within a larger, hopeful attempt to resolve the tensions between science or naturalism and religion or spiritualism. The rejection of Avicenna reflects broader conflicts between Aristotelian and Neoplatonic traditions, suggesting a complex interplay of secularization and theological influences in shaping medical thought during the Renaissance.</p>","PeriodicalId":50687,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Anatomy","volume":"37 6","pages":"649-660"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Anatomy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ca.24169","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANATOMY & MORPHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the 14th century CE, a pivotal shift took place in the world of medicine as its epicenter transitioned from the Middle East to Europe. The emergence of the European Renaissance sparked skepticism regarding the significance of Avicenna's contributions to the advancement of medicine. This paper explores how the rise of secularization and the Renaissance in Europe marked significant cultural transformations, fostering the spread of literacy. These societal shifts influenced the trajectory of medical thought, and Avicenna's “Canon of Medicine” received both praise and condemnation amidst the evolving intellectual landscape. In this context, Lorenz Fries composed his “Defense of Avicenna,” a testament to his profound admiration for Avicenna's legacy. This paper presents an English translation of Fries' 1530 work, and introduces Fries and Avicenna's “Canon,” contextualizing Fries' defense within the broader rejection of Arab-language medical texts in the 16th century. It also explores Avicenna's influence on European medicine and anatomy during the Renaissance and highlights the enduring relevance of his contributions to the annals of science. Fries' defense underscores Avicenna's methodological acumen and emphasizes the importance of a robust theoretical foundation in medical practice. Avicenna's integration of Aristotelianism with Platonism highlighted the necessity of a rigorous method informed by theory in medical analysis. Fries' defense remains relevant today, particularly in advocating for systematic medical analysis against subjective approaches. Avicenna's medical philosophy seems nested within a larger, hopeful attempt to resolve the tensions between science or naturalism and religion or spiritualism. The rejection of Avicenna reflects broader conflicts between Aristotelian and Neoplatonic traditions, suggesting a complex interplay of secularization and theological influences in shaping medical thought during the Renaissance.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洛伦茨-弗里斯为医生王子阿维森纳辩护:致德国医学家(1530 年)
公元 14 世纪,世界医学发生了关键性的转变,其中心从中东转移到了欧洲。欧洲文艺复兴的兴起引发了人们对阿维森纳对医学发展的贡献的怀疑。本文探讨了欧洲世俗化和文艺复兴的兴起如何标志着重大的文化变革,促进了扫盲的普及。这些社会变革影响了医学思想的发展轨迹,而阿维森纳的《医学大全》在不断演变的思想格局中受到了褒贬不一的评价。在此背景下,洛伦兹-弗里斯撰写了《阿维森纳辩护》一书,以证明他对阿维森纳遗产的深深钦佩。本文介绍了弗里斯 1530 年著作的英译本,并介绍了弗里斯和阿维森纳的 "卡农",将弗里斯的辩护与 16 世纪对阿拉伯语医学文本的广泛排斥联系起来。该书还探讨了阿维森纳在文艺复兴时期对欧洲医学和解剖学的影响,并强调了他在科学史上所做贡献的永恒意义。弗里斯的辩护强调了阿维森纳敏锐的方法论,并强调了坚实的理论基础在医学实践中的重要性。阿维森纳将亚里士多德主义与柏拉图主义融为一体,突出了在医学分析中以理论为指导的严谨方法的必要性。弗里斯的辩护在今天仍然具有现实意义,特别是在倡导系统的医学分析以反对主观方法方面。阿维森纳的医学哲学似乎嵌套在一个更大的、充满希望的尝试中,以解决科学或自然主义与宗教或灵性主义之间的紧张关系。对阿维森纳的排斥反映了亚里士多德和新柏拉图传统之间更广泛的冲突,表明在文艺复兴时期,世俗化和神学影响在塑造医学思想方面的复杂相互作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Anatomy
Clinical Anatomy 医学-解剖学与形态学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
12.50%
发文量
154
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Anatomy is the Official Journal of the American Association of Clinical Anatomists and the British Association of Clinical Anatomists. The goal of Clinical Anatomy is to provide a medium for the exchange of current information between anatomists and clinicians. This journal embraces anatomy in all its aspects as applied to medical practice. Furthermore, the journal assists physicians and other health care providers in keeping abreast of new methodologies for patient management and informs educators of new developments in clinical anatomy and teaching techniques. Clinical Anatomy publishes original and review articles of scientific, clinical, and educational interest. Papers covering the application of anatomic principles to the solution of clinical problems and/or the application of clinical observations to expand anatomic knowledge are welcomed.
期刊最新文献
"Practical Anatomy is to medical men what mathematics are to the physicist". Using large language models (ChatGPT, Copilot, PaLM, Bard, and Gemini) in Gross Anatomy course: Comparative analysis. Is dissection or prosection equal in dental anatomy education? Comparative assessment of three AI platforms in answering USMLE Step 1 anatomy questions or identifying anatomical structures on radiographs. Treatment of thoracic outlet syndrome to relieve chronic migraine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1