A scoping review of Australian nutrition resources for feeding children under 5 years of age

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q3 NUTRITION & DIETETICS Nutrition & Dietetics Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1111/1747-0080.12871
Natassja Billich, Clare F. Dix, Jacqui Palmer, Ceara Swyripa, Beatrice Murawski, Helen Truby
{"title":"A scoping review of Australian nutrition resources for feeding children under 5 years of age","authors":"Natassja Billich, Clare F. Dix, Jacqui Palmer, Ceara Swyripa, Beatrice Murawski, Helen Truby","doi":"10.1111/1747-0080.12871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IntroductionThis review identified and appraised Australian open‐access online resources relating to feeding and nutrition during the first 5 years of life.MethodsEligible resources were identified by hand searching plus a targeted search of pertinent source websites (government, hospitals and health services, peak bodies, and nutrition organisations) published in English with/without translations to other languages between 2012 and 2022. Search terms relating to the population (children) AND topic (nutrition OR feeding) were entered into Google and Bing. Critical appraisal of each resource was conducted using a modified version of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index.ResultsThe search identified 1327 nutrition resources, of which 1067 were appraised. Forty‐five percent were paper‐based resources, 47% were online content only, and 8% audio‐visual resources. Almost half of the resources (45%) broadly addressed the 0–5 years age range, and 24% provided information on breast or formula feeding. Limited resources were found specifically addressing growth and development (5%) and introducing solids (8%). Only 10% of resources were culturally tailored and only 3% were translated into a language other than English. Appraisal showed the majority included visual cues and appropriate language, but less included images to support the main message of the resource.DiscussionAlthough there were a large volume of evidence‐based nutrition resources available in Australia for feeding children under 5 years, they were highly dispersed and of varying quality. Collating and presenting these resources in an open‐access resource hub would empower families and education and health professionals in the nutritional care of young children.","PeriodicalId":19368,"journal":{"name":"Nutrition & Dietetics","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nutrition & Dietetics","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/1747-0080.12871","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

IntroductionThis review identified and appraised Australian open‐access online resources relating to feeding and nutrition during the first 5 years of life.MethodsEligible resources were identified by hand searching plus a targeted search of pertinent source websites (government, hospitals and health services, peak bodies, and nutrition organisations) published in English with/without translations to other languages between 2012 and 2022. Search terms relating to the population (children) AND topic (nutrition OR feeding) were entered into Google and Bing. Critical appraisal of each resource was conducted using a modified version of the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention Clear Communication Index.ResultsThe search identified 1327 nutrition resources, of which 1067 were appraised. Forty‐five percent were paper‐based resources, 47% were online content only, and 8% audio‐visual resources. Almost half of the resources (45%) broadly addressed the 0–5 years age range, and 24% provided information on breast or formula feeding. Limited resources were found specifically addressing growth and development (5%) and introducing solids (8%). Only 10% of resources were culturally tailored and only 3% were translated into a language other than English. Appraisal showed the majority included visual cues and appropriate language, but less included images to support the main message of the resource.DiscussionAlthough there were a large volume of evidence‐based nutrition resources available in Australia for feeding children under 5 years, they were highly dispersed and of varying quality. Collating and presenting these resources in an open‐access resource hub would empower families and education and health professionals in the nutritional care of young children.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚 5 岁以下儿童喂养营养资源范围审查
方法通过人工搜索和有针对性地搜索 2012 年至 2022 年间以英语发布的相关资料来源网站(政府、医院和卫生服务机构、高峰机构和营养组织),以及/或未翻译成其他语言的网站,确定符合条件的资料。在谷歌和必应中输入了与人群(儿童)和主题(营养或喂养)相关的搜索词。使用疾病控制和预防中心清晰交流索引的修改版对每项资源进行严格评估。45%为纸质资源,47%仅为在线内容,8%为视听资源。近一半的资源(45%)广泛涉及 0-5 岁年龄段,24% 提供了母乳或配方奶喂养方面的信息。专门针对生长发育(5%)和引入固体食物(8%)的资源有限。只有 10%的资料是根据文化定制的,只有 3%的资料被翻译成英语以外的语言。讨论尽管澳大利亚有大量以证据为基础的营养资源可用于 5 岁以下儿童的喂养,但这些资源非常分散,质量也参差不齐。将这些资源整合并展示在一个开放存取的资源中心,将增强家庭、教育和卫生专业人员在幼儿营养护理方面的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Nutrition & Dietetics
Nutrition & Dietetics 医学-营养学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
16.10%
发文量
69
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Nutrition & Dietetics is the official journal of the Dietitians Association of Australia. Covering all aspects of food, nutrition and dietetics, the Journal provides a forum for the reporting, discussion and development of scientifically credible knowledge related to human nutrition and dietetics. Widely respected in Australia and around the world, Nutrition & Dietetics publishes original research, methodology analyses, research reviews and much more. The Journal aims to keep health professionals abreast of current knowledge on human nutrition and diet, and accepts contributions from around the world.
期刊最新文献
Harnessing delegation and technology to identify and manage malnutrition in a digital hospital: An implementation study. Micronutrient intakes in a young antenatal population-10-year Retrospective survey at a Sydney hospital clinic. Perspectives of Australian healthcare professionals towards gamification in practice. Enhancing or impeding? The influence of digital systems on interprofessional practice and person-centred care in nutrition care systems across rehabilitation units. Oral interview in place of traditional objective structured clinical examinations for assessing placement readiness in nutrition and dietetics education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1