Major UK non-commercial sponsors’ efforts to reduce research waste: a mixed-methods study

IF 9 3区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine Pub Date : 2024-04-17 DOI:10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112540
Till Bruckner, Aminul Schuster, Belén Chavarría, Carolina Cruz, Fabiola Karely Lizárraga Illán, Ronak Borana, Tungamirai Ishe Bvute, Daniel Sánchez
{"title":"Major UK non-commercial sponsors’ efforts to reduce research waste: a mixed-methods study","authors":"Till Bruckner, Aminul Schuster, Belén Chavarría, Carolina Cruz, Fabiola Karely Lizárraga Illán, Ronak Borana, Tungamirai Ishe Bvute, Daniel Sánchez","doi":"10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112540","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Worldwide, a significant proportion of clinical trials end up as costly research waste because their results are never made public.1–3 The resulting gaps in the medical evidence base harm patients and undermine public health.4 The Declaration of Helsinki and the WHO both call for all clinical trial results to be made public.5 6 In the wake of a 2018 UK parliamentary enquiry, non-commercial clinical trial sponsors in the UK substantially improved outcome reporting for drug trials (Clinical Trials of Investigative Medicinal Products, CTIMPs) by uploading the summary results of many CTIMPs onto the European Union Clinical Trials Register (EUCTR) which exclusively lists drug trials. However, these efforts typically did not extend to other types of trials, which are listed on other trial registries. This study assesses the current publication status of 145 clinical trials that are not CTIMPs that were sponsored by ten major UK non-commercial sponsors and were completed or terminated in 2017, allowing a 5-year follow-up period for publication. The lead researcher (TB) identified the 10 most prolific non-commercial sponsors of clinical trials in the UK by accessing the EU Trials Tracker on 27 October 2022, employing the …","PeriodicalId":9059,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112540","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worldwide, a significant proportion of clinical trials end up as costly research waste because their results are never made public.1–3 The resulting gaps in the medical evidence base harm patients and undermine public health.4 The Declaration of Helsinki and the WHO both call for all clinical trial results to be made public.5 6 In the wake of a 2018 UK parliamentary enquiry, non-commercial clinical trial sponsors in the UK substantially improved outcome reporting for drug trials (Clinical Trials of Investigative Medicinal Products, CTIMPs) by uploading the summary results of many CTIMPs onto the European Union Clinical Trials Register (EUCTR) which exclusively lists drug trials. However, these efforts typically did not extend to other types of trials, which are listed on other trial registries. This study assesses the current publication status of 145 clinical trials that are not CTIMPs that were sponsored by ten major UK non-commercial sponsors and were completed or terminated in 2017, allowing a 5-year follow-up period for publication. The lead researcher (TB) identified the 10 most prolific non-commercial sponsors of clinical trials in the UK by accessing the EU Trials Tracker on 27 October 2022, employing the …
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
英国主要非商业赞助商减少研究浪费的努力:一项混合方法研究
在全球范围内,有相当一部分临床试验因其结果从未公开而最终成为代价高昂的研究浪费。1-3 由此造成的医学证据基础空白伤害了患者,损害了公众健康。4 《赫尔辛基宣言》和世界卫生组织都呼吁公开所有临床试验结果。6 在 2018 年英国议会调查之后,英国的非商业临床试验申办者通过将许多 CTIMP 的摘要结果上传到专门列出药物试验的欧盟临床试验注册中心(EUCTR),大大改善了药物试验(研究性药品临床试验,CTIMP)的结果报告。然而,这些工作通常并没有扩展到其他类型的试验,因为这些试验已被列入其他试验登记册。本研究评估了145项非CTIMP临床试验的发表现状,这些临床试验由英国10家主要非商业赞助商赞助,于2017年完成或终止,有5年的跟踪发表期。首席研究员(TB)于2022年10月27日访问了欧盟试验追踪系统(EU Trials Tracker),确定了英国临床试验中最多产的10家非商业赞助商,并采用...
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine
BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
8.90
自引率
3.40%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine (BMJ EBM) publishes original evidence-based research, insights and opinions on what matters for health care. We focus on the tools, methods, and concepts that are basic and central to practising evidence-based medicine and deliver relevant, trustworthy and impactful evidence. BMJ EBM is a Plan S compliant Transformative Journal and adheres to the highest possible industry standards for editorial policies and publication ethics.
期刊最新文献
Clinical effect and contributing factors of acupuncture for knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review and pairwise and exploratory network meta-analysis. Rapid reviews methods series: considerations and recommendations for evidence synthesis in rapid reviews. Overcoming challenges in the implementation of clinical practice guidelines in China. Enhancing clinical practice guidelines with STAR. Safety implications of mask use: a systematic review and evidence map.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1