Integrating facies, mineralogy, and paleomagnetism to constrain the age and provenance of Paleozoic siliciclastic sedimentary rocks along the northern Gondwana margin: insights from the Araba and Naqus formations in western Gulf of Suez, Egypt

IF 1.8 3区 地球科学 Q3 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY International Journal of Earth Sciences Pub Date : 2024-04-18 DOI:10.1007/s00531-024-02405-x
Ashraf M. Al-Nashar, Nabil A. Abdel Hafez, Mohamed W. Abd El-Moghny, Ahmed Awad, Sherif Farouk, Haitham M. Ayyad
{"title":"Integrating facies, mineralogy, and paleomagnetism to constrain the age and provenance of Paleozoic siliciclastic sedimentary rocks along the northern Gondwana margin: insights from the Araba and Naqus formations in western Gulf of Suez, Egypt","authors":"Ashraf M. Al-Nashar, Nabil A. Abdel Hafez, Mohamed W. Abd El-Moghny, Ahmed Awad, Sherif Farouk, Haitham M. Ayyad","doi":"10.1007/s00531-024-02405-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The depositional ages and provenance of the Paleozoic Araba and Naqus Formations along the northern Gondwanan margin in Egypt have remained uncertain due to a lack of index fossils. Resolving this issue is crucial for understanding regional geology during deposition and subsequent tectonic development. We integrate detailed facies analysis, anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS), paleomagnetism, and mineralogical data to elucidate the genesis and depositional ages of the Araba and Naqus Formations. Petrographic analyses identified seven distinct facies types, providing insights into sedimentary textures, maturity, and sources, with contributions from igneous and metamorphic sources indicated by heavy minerals. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis identified accessory minerals such as quartz, goethite, kaolinite, hematite, and anatase. Paleomagnetism isolated two magnetic components (<i>C</i><sub>A</sub> and <i>C</i><sub>N</sub>) providing the first robust paleo pole positions at Lat. = 70.8° N, Long. = 308.2° E and Lat. = 37.8° N, Long. = 233.1° E, indicating Cambrian and Carboniferous ages for the Araba and Naqus formations, respectively. Thermal demagnetization constrained these dates using established polarity timescales. Mineralogical data indicated that the Araba Formation originated from an igneous source, while the Naqus Formation had a mixed metamorphic-igneous provenance. The integrated AMS and paleomagnetic data reveal evidence of post-depositional deformation. Specifically, the clustering of maximum AMS axes in the NW–SE direction for both formations, suggests the initial presence of a primary depositional fabric. However, prevalent tectonic activity during the Cenozoic appears to have overprinted and modified this fabric through deformation related to rifting of the Gulf of Suez region. Through this novel multi-proxy approach, we have resolved long-standing uncertainties regarding the formations' depositional ages. Our study thereby provides the first chronostratigraphic framework for these strategically important sedimentary units, significantly advancing understanding of regional Paleozoic geology.</p><h3 data-test=\"abstract-sub-heading\">Graphical abstract</h3>","PeriodicalId":13845,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Earth Sciences","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00531-024-02405-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The depositional ages and provenance of the Paleozoic Araba and Naqus Formations along the northern Gondwanan margin in Egypt have remained uncertain due to a lack of index fossils. Resolving this issue is crucial for understanding regional geology during deposition and subsequent tectonic development. We integrate detailed facies analysis, anisotropy of magnetic susceptibility (AMS), paleomagnetism, and mineralogical data to elucidate the genesis and depositional ages of the Araba and Naqus Formations. Petrographic analyses identified seven distinct facies types, providing insights into sedimentary textures, maturity, and sources, with contributions from igneous and metamorphic sources indicated by heavy minerals. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis identified accessory minerals such as quartz, goethite, kaolinite, hematite, and anatase. Paleomagnetism isolated two magnetic components (CA and CN) providing the first robust paleo pole positions at Lat. = 70.8° N, Long. = 308.2° E and Lat. = 37.8° N, Long. = 233.1° E, indicating Cambrian and Carboniferous ages for the Araba and Naqus formations, respectively. Thermal demagnetization constrained these dates using established polarity timescales. Mineralogical data indicated that the Araba Formation originated from an igneous source, while the Naqus Formation had a mixed metamorphic-igneous provenance. The integrated AMS and paleomagnetic data reveal evidence of post-depositional deformation. Specifically, the clustering of maximum AMS axes in the NW–SE direction for both formations, suggests the initial presence of a primary depositional fabric. However, prevalent tectonic activity during the Cenozoic appears to have overprinted and modified this fabric through deformation related to rifting of the Gulf of Suez region. Through this novel multi-proxy approach, we have resolved long-standing uncertainties regarding the formations' depositional ages. Our study thereby provides the first chronostratigraphic framework for these strategically important sedimentary units, significantly advancing understanding of regional Paleozoic geology.

Graphical abstract

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整合岩相、矿物学和古地磁学,制约冈瓦纳大陆北缘古生代硅质沉积岩的年龄和产地:埃及苏伊士湾西部阿拉巴和纳库斯地层的启示
由于缺乏索引化石,埃及冈瓦纳山脉北缘古生代阿拉巴地层和纳库斯地层的沉积年龄和出处一直不确定。解决这一问题对于了解沉积过程中的区域地质以及随后的构造发展至关重要。我们整合了详细的岩相分析、磁感应强度各向异性(AMS)、古地磁学和矿物学数据,以阐明阿拉巴地层和纳库斯地层的成因和沉积年代。岩相分析确定了七种不同的岩相类型,提供了有关沉积质地、成熟度和来源的见解,重矿物显示了火成岩和变质岩的来源。X 射线衍射(XRD)分析确定了石英、网纹石、高岭石、赤铁矿和锐钛矿等附属矿物。古地磁学分离出两个磁性成分(CA 和 CN),首次在北纬 = 70.8°、东经 = 308.2°和北纬 = 37.8°、东经 = 233.1°提供了可靠的古磁极位置,分别表明了阿拉巴地层和纳库斯地层的寒武纪和石炭纪年龄。热消磁法利用已确定的极性时间尺度对这些日期进行了约束。矿物学数据表明,阿拉巴地层源于火成岩,而纳库斯地层则源于变质岩和火成岩混合地层。综合 AMS 和古地磁数据揭示了沉积后变形的证据。具体地说,两个地层的最大 AMS 轴都集中在西北-东南方向,这表明最初存在原生沉积结构。然而,新生代的普遍构造活动似乎通过与苏伊士湾地区断裂有关的变形对这一结构进行了覆盖和修改。通过这种新颖的多代理方法,我们解决了有关地层沉积年龄的长期不确定性。因此,我们的研究为这些具有重要战略意义的沉积单元提供了第一个年代地层学框架,极大地促进了对区域古生代地质学的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Earth Sciences
International Journal of Earth Sciences 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
120
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Earth Sciences publishes process-oriented original and review papers on the history of the earth, including - Dynamics of the lithosphere - Tectonics and volcanology - Sedimentology - Evolution of life - Marine and continental ecosystems - Global dynamics of physicochemical cycles - Mineral deposits and hydrocarbons - Surface processes.
期刊最新文献
Multistep evolution of harzburgitic mantle underneath pipe 200 kimberlite, northern Lesotho: a study on xenoliths and their implication on diamond-barren nature of pipe 200 kimberlite A latest Eocene depocenter in between uplifted masses (SW Netherlands and NW Belgium) Understanding the genesis of ore-bearing and ore-barren adakitic rocks: insights from geochronology and geochemical analysis of the Tuncang intrusion and enclaves along the South Tan-Lu Fault Petrogenesis and geochemical evolution of Chole basalts, Southeastern Ethiopian Plateau The large Rupelian Rhodope Massif eruptions as the source of airfall tuffs in SE, S and Central Europe: 40Ar/39Ar and U–Pb age constraints
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1