Relationships Among Pelvic Congestion Syndrome Pain, Daily Activities, and Quality of Life

Sarah E. Patel, Steven R. Chesnut
{"title":"Relationships Among Pelvic Congestion Syndrome Pain, Daily Activities, and Quality of Life","authors":"Sarah E. Patel,&nbsp;Steven R. Chesnut","doi":"10.1016/j.jogn.2024.03.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To examine women’s experiences of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) pain.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Descriptive, cross-sectional.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>Online questionnaires in a Facebook PCS support group.</p></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><p>Convenience sample of 143 women who self-identified as being diagnosed with PCS.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>We recruited women through a social media support group and invited them to participate in a self-reported questionnaire. We collected demographic information and used the McGill Pain Questionnaire to elicit responses related to pain quality, pain intensity, quality of life, and satisfaction with health care. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Respondents characterized their PCS pain as exhausting, stabbing, sharp, shooting, and tender. Respondents indicated that 19 of 24 daily activities increased PCS pain, whereas only 5 reduced PCS pain. Pain intensity was negatively related to the quality of life, health satisfaction, sleep, and sexual relationships.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Chronic pelvic pain from PCS severely affected quality of life among respondents. These findings suggest a difference in the presentation of PCS from historical pain depictions and further highlight the need to identify pain profiles to increase timely and precise diagnosis. Further research is needed to evaluate interventions to increase the quality of life for women with PCS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":54903,"journal":{"name":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","volume":"53 4","pages":"Pages 416-426"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jognn-Journal of Obstetric Gynecologic and Neonatal Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0884217524000431","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

To examine women’s experiences of pelvic congestion syndrome (PCS) pain.

Design

Descriptive, cross-sectional.

Setting

Online questionnaires in a Facebook PCS support group.

Participants

Convenience sample of 143 women who self-identified as being diagnosed with PCS.

Methods

We recruited women through a social media support group and invited them to participate in a self-reported questionnaire. We collected demographic information and used the McGill Pain Questionnaire to elicit responses related to pain quality, pain intensity, quality of life, and satisfaction with health care. We analyzed data using descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients.

Results

Respondents characterized their PCS pain as exhausting, stabbing, sharp, shooting, and tender. Respondents indicated that 19 of 24 daily activities increased PCS pain, whereas only 5 reduced PCS pain. Pain intensity was negatively related to the quality of life, health satisfaction, sleep, and sexual relationships.

Conclusion

Chronic pelvic pain from PCS severely affected quality of life among respondents. These findings suggest a difference in the presentation of PCS from historical pain depictions and further highlight the need to identify pain profiles to increase timely and precise diagnosis. Further research is needed to evaluate interventions to increase the quality of life for women with PCS.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
骨盆充血综合征疼痛、日常活动和生活质量之间的关系
研究妇女对骨盆充血综合征(PCS)疼痛的体验。描述性、横断面。在 Facebook PCS 支持小组中进行在线问卷调查。对 143 名自称被诊断患有 PCS 的妇女进行方便抽样调查。我们通过社交媒体支持小组招募妇女,并邀请她们参与自我报告问卷调查。我们收集了人口统计学信息,并使用麦吉尔疼痛问卷调查了与疼痛质量、疼痛强度、生活质量和医疗服务满意度相关的问题。我们使用描述性统计和相关系数对数据进行了分析。受访者将他们的 PCS 疼痛描述为疲惫、刺痛、尖锐、射击和触痛。受访者表示,24 项日常活动中有 19 项会加重 PCS 疼痛,而只有 5 项会减轻 PCS 疼痛。疼痛强度与生活质量、健康满意度、睡眠和性关系呈负相关。PCS 引起的慢性盆腔疼痛严重影响了受访者的生活质量。这些研究结果表明,PCS 的表现形式与历史上的疼痛描述有所不同,并进一步强调了识别疼痛特征以提高诊断及时性和准确性的必要性。还需要进一步开展研究,以评估提高 PCS 妇女生活质量的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.60%
发文量
0
审稿时长
43 days
期刊介绍: JOGNN is a premier resource for health care professionals committed to clinical scholarship that advances the health care of women and newborns. With a focus on nursing practice, JOGNN addresses the latest research, practice issues, policies, opinions, and trends in the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns. This peer-reviewed scientific and technical journal is highly respected for groundbreaking articles on important - and sometimes controversial - issues. Articles published in JOGNN emphasize research evidence and clinical practice, building both science and clinical applications. JOGNN seeks clinical, policy and research manuscripts on the evidence supporting current best practice as well as developing or emerging practice trends. A balance of quantitative and qualitative research with an emphasis on biobehavioral outcome studies and intervention trials is desired. Manuscripts are welcomed on all subjects focused on the care of women, childbearing families, and newborns.
期刊最新文献
Case Report of Dysphoric Milk Ejection Reflex. Meta-ethnography of the Experiences of Women of Color Who Survived Severe Maternal Morbidity or Birth Complications. Secondary Qualitative Analysis of Stigmatizing and Nonstigmatizing Language Used in Hospital Birth Settings. Mental Health Experiences of Muslim American Women During the Perinatal Period. Nurse Perceptions of Barriers to Infection Prevention and Control in Labor and Delivery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1